Thursday, February 22 , 2018, 3:28 am | Fair 36º

 
 
 
 
Advice

Mona Charen: Democratic Payoffs, Er, Stimulus

Government decision-making, by nature, is all about politics

When a non-American scholar I admired let slip a casual reference to “American corruption” a few years ago, my chauvinistic pride was wounded. This isn’t Mexico, after all, or even Italy, where bribes are the normal social lubricant. Still, an unsentimental examination of government dollars at work seems to confirm my friend’s observation.

Mona Charen
Mona Charen

A small example: The U.S. government has announced plans to spend $340 million on an advertising campaign to promote the census, including $2.5 million for ads during the Super Bowl. Though the nation has been collecting this data for 220 years, it seems we now need commercial jingles to complete the forms.

Or could there be another agenda? The government, The Hill newspaper reports, will target $80 million of those dollars to racial and ethnic minorities and non-English speakers — groups that vote disproportionately Democratic. Nor will Democrats permit efforts to limit the count to those here legally. An effort by Sen. David Vitter, R-La., to exclude illegal aliens from the count went nowhere.

Illegal aliens don’t (usually) vote, of course. But when they are counted in the census, they do affect representation in the Congress. So some of the money you pay in taxes will go toward increasing the legislative clout of one party.

That same party has seen to its own perpetuation in other ways, too. Consider the $787 billion stimulus bill. Veronique de Rugy and Jerry Brito of George Mason University report that “a total of 56,399 contracts and grants totaling $157,028,362,536 were awarded in this first quarter for which Recovery.gov reports are available. The number of jobs claimed as created or saved is 638,826.54 — an average of $245,807.51 per job.”

But it gets more interesting. “There are 177 districts represented by Republicans and 259 represented by Democrats,” they write. “On average, Democratic districts received 1.6 times more awards than Republican ones. The average number of awards per Republican district is 94, while the average number of awards per Democratic district is 152.” Democratic districts also received nearly twice the dollar value of funds as Republican ones.

While the stimulus was sold as a solution to unemployment (it was supposed to keep the rate from going above 8 percent, remember?), unemployment has continued to climb since passage. That’s not surprising when you consider that the overwhelming majority of funds (116,625 grants) have gone to governments, not the private sector (13,080 grants).

Nor does the allocation of stimulus funds appear to bear any relation to unemployment levels. North Dakota, with an unemployment rate of 4.2 percent, reports 356 jobs “saved or created” with stimulus funds, more than many states with high unemployment rates. That is, if we can trust the data. It’s important to bear in mind when discussing these numbers that large numbers of grantees listed on the administration’s Web site Recovery.org (10 congressional districts in Ohio, one in Connecticut, several in Iowa and South Carolina) have proven to be nonexistent.

Some private contractors have done handsomely, though. Mark Penn, a Democratic pollster, received a contract worth $5.97 million to work on a public relations campaign to promote the national transition from analog to digital television. His firm worked for 39 days to “bolster the reach, penetration and impact of the FCC’s DTV readiness messages in selected markets, specifically among the groups that had been determined to be the most at risk.” It saved three jobs!

Yes, everybody does it, and Republicans are not pure either. But that’s not the whole story.

Conservative voters, unlike many Democrats, don’t regard government as a scramble for booty. When Sen. Ben Nelson, D-Neb., exchanged his vote on health care for a deal that would exempt Nebraska from Medicaid increases in perpetuity, only 17 percent of the voters in that conservative state approved. Nelson, who won with 64 percent of the vote in 2004, is now trailing his likely opponent by 30 points. Republican Gov. Dave Heineman spoke for his state when he told Politico, “The last few days have made Nebraskans so angry that now it’s a matter of principle. The federal government can keep that money.”

There is no way to make government decision-making anything other than political. As President James Madison reminded us, governments wouldn’t be necessary if men were angels. The best course is what the Democrats most aim to thwart — limiting the scope of the state and its aggrandizing tendencies.

We’re not Mexico, but we have corruption, all right.

Mona Charen writes for Creators Syndicate. Click here for more information or to contact her.

  • Ask
  • Vote
  • Investigate
  • Answer

Noozhawk Asks: What’s Your Question?

Welcome to Noozhawk Asks, a new feature in which you ask the questions, you help decide what Noozhawk investigates, and you work with us to find the answers.

Here’s how it works: You share your questions with us in the nearby box. In some cases, we may work with you to find the answers. In others, we may ask you to vote on your top choices to help us narrow the scope. And we’ll be regularly asking you for your feedback on a specific issue or topic.

We also expect to work together with the reader who asked the winning questions to find the answer together. Noozhawk’s objective is to come at questions from a place of curiosity and openness, and we believe a transparent collaboration is the key to achieve it.

The results of our investigation will be published here in this Noozhawk Asks section. Once or twice a month, we plan to do a review of what was asked and answered.

Thanks for asking!

Click here to get started >

Support Noozhawk Today

You are an important ally in our mission to deliver clear, objective, high-quality professional news reporting for Santa Barbara, Goleta and the rest of Santa Barbara County. Join the Hawks Club today to help keep Noozhawk soaring.

We offer four membership levels: $5 a month, $10 a month, $25 a month or $1 a week. Payments can be made through PayPal below, or click here for information on recurring credit-card payments.

Thank you for your vital support.



Reader Comments

Noozhawk is no longer accepting reader comments on our articles. Click here for the announcement. Readers are instead invited to submit letters to the editor by emailing them to [email protected]. Please provide your full name and community, as well as contact information for verification purposes only.

Daily Noozhawk

Subscribe to Noozhawk's A.M. Report, our free e-Bulletin sent out every day at 4:15 a.m. with Noozhawk's top stories, hand-picked by the editors.

Sign Up Now >