Saturday, October 22 , 2016, 5:03 am | Fair 53º

  • Follow Noozhawk on LinkedIn
  • Follow Noozhawk on Pinterest
  • Follow Noozhawk on YouTube

Local News

Undersecretary for Science Talks Sustainability at UCSB

Steven Koonin says there are ways to help manage the population boom's effects on finite resources

Steven Koonin, undersecretary for science at the Department of Energy, spoke about sustainability on Thursday at UCSB’s Campbell Hall.

The lecture was sponsored by UCSB’s Institute for Energy Efficiency and the Novim Group.

Koonin, who was greeted by a well-attended hall, oversees $5 billion of research at the federal Office of Science.

Throughout his address, Koonin stressed that as the population grows and develops, resources will become more strained.

He showed a series of charts that showed that as a country increased its gross domestic product, its consumption of energy and even calories dramatically escalated when compared with poorer countries. As the countries on the chart became more developed over time, their consumption patterns crested upward.

“There are no negative slopes on this chart,” he said, adding that the United States represents 4 percent on the world’s population but consumes up to 20 percent.

The world’s population is in the middle of a quadrupuling spanning from 1950 to 2050.

“The Earth is finite,” he said, offering several potential solutions: decoupling development and consumption, finding new or substitute resources, and resetting expectations.

With 80 percent of the world’s current energy supply coming from fossil fuels, Koonin broached the inevitable question: Will we ever run out?

Koonin said he doesn’t think so. He revealed a chart showing that scientists have proven reserves of oil, natural gas and coal lasting into the next 100 years. Reserves that can be reached unconventionally, such as shale gas, are just waiting to be tapped, he said.

In addition, the rest of the world has embraced more nuclear power as a source of energy. 

Even though reserves seem stable, the United States spends $400 billion a day importing oil into the country. When the majority of that product comes from an unstable region of the world, it affects what Koonin called energy security.

His proposed solutions included increasing fuel efficiency, promoting the gradual electrification of the transport system and aggressively working on alternative fuels. He called on the United States to “lead the world” in terms of innovation.

“The world is going to need these technologies,” he said, adding that innovation hubs, which are partnerships between industry, academia and government, are undertaking all kinds of research projects. Koonin said he knew of one that was working on artificial photosynthesis.

America has advantages even as it competes with innovation giants such as China and India, he said. The American “Idea,” the rule of law, a system that encourages innovation and a premium on higher education are all pluses as it tries to compete.

Still, “China is about two generations ahead as they build their electrical grid,” he said.

Koonin also touched on Copenhagen and America’s pledge to reduce greenhouse gases 17 percent by 2020.

He said that 20 percent of America’s power comes from nuclear power, and in order to reach that emissions cut, “we’re going to need a lot more of it.”

During a question and answer session, Koonin was asked about the problem of what to do with nuclear waste. Recapturing unspent energy and reducing the radioactivity of waste left behind was key, and Koonin said that very little research had been done in the United States on nuclear waste storage.

He was also asked about his thoughts on a carbon tax, such as the cap-and-trade policies.

“It’s absolutely essential that we put a price on carbon if we want to reduce emissions,” he said, adding that if companies reduce their emissions that the government should make the trade-offs worth it. “We need to crank up the innovation engine in the country and focus on the right technologies.”

America still has advantages, he said, and “we had better realize them and get moving.”

Noozhawk staff writer Lara Cooper can be reached at .(JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address).

Reader Comments

Noozhawk's intent is not to limit the discussion of our stories but to elevate it. Comments should be relevant and must be free of profanity and abusive language and attacks.

By posting on Noozhawk, you:

» Agree to be respectful. Noozhawk encourages intelligent and impassioned discussion and debate, but now has a zero-tolerance policy for those who cannot express their opinions in a civil manner.

» Agree not to use Noozhawk’s forums for personal attacks. This includes any sort of personal attack — including, but not limited to, the people in our stories, the journalists who create these stories, fellow readers who comment on our stories, or anyone else in our community.

» Agree not to post on Noozhawk any comments that can be construed as libelous, defamatory, obscene, profane, vulgar, harmful, threatening, tortious, harassing, abusive, hateful, sexist, racially or ethnically objectionable, or that are invasive of another’s privacy.

» Agree not to post in a manner than emulates, purports or pretends to be someone else. Under no circumstances are readers posting to Noozhawk to knowingly use the name or identity of another person, whether that is another reader on this site, a public figure, celebrity, elected official or fictitious character. This also means readers will not knowingly give out any personal information of other members of these forums.

» Agree not to solicit others. You agree you will not use Noozhawk’s forums to solicit and/or advertise for personal blogs and websites, without Noozhawk’s express written approval.

Noozhawk’s management and editors, in our sole discretion, retain the right to remove individual posts or to revoke the access privileges of anyone who we believe has violated any of these terms or any other term of this agreement; however, we are under no obligation to do so.

» on 01.15.10 @ 05:12 PM

Why is it that liberals so dominate UCSB?  This issue is not nearly as controversial as most of their positions, however their television station and newspaper should be named the communist daily.  They make the Independent look like the National Review.  Universities in general continue to move their ivory towers further and further away from common sense.  Clearly, they will continue to have less and less influence with a legitimately frustrated public. Their relentless push towards socialism is not what made this country great.

» on 01.15.10 @ 05:44 PM

Dr. Koonin gave an interesting talk.

Pretty much the same talk he gives every time he speaks here.

Maybe it’s time for him to have his staff update his main slides. Many still track data sets ending in 2004-05. It’s now five years later!

The salient point Koonin’s Cal Tech science wonk made is that America and “the advanced economies” have systems, technologies, resources, to begin to become “energy independent,” and visibly reduce impacts on climate change and carbon loading.

What we don’t yet have are the political tools or moral courage to make those changes true national/international priorities, with real focus and follow-through.

Or the political tools and skill to persuade China, India, Brazil, to jump onto the world’s “clean/green” energy/consumption bandwagon.

Without those two, climate change will not be slowed, and America’s ability to feed
itself, and have adequate potable water could be permanently compromised within
the next fifty years.

Pretty sobering.

Especially when you consider that Rupert Murdoch’s people, and one of America’s
two major political parties, are still in fervent public denial that these problems
exist, or that we should even try to fix them.

» on 01.15.10 @ 06:33 PM

It seems that the country has reached a climate crossroads, environment vs. economy. As long as the capitalist system as is demands growth and consumption, the only way to address the 4% of the world using 20% of the world’s resources problem will be with these “green” technologies. Still, this over-consumption problem, which seems to be the business plan of America thus far, must be given a serious “re-think” if we are going to continue our luxurious Western lifestyle at the expense of poorer people around the world.

As someone in their 20s, it is easy to see that the political will to make such drastic changes to the bottom line of how we exist will not change with those in power now, it may be several decades before our lifestyles may be retrofitted to require less energy, or at least more locally attained energy. No doubt these changes will come, but as long as economy trumps ecology as national ideology, we will continue on this path of needless greed, wastefulness, and over consumption.

Support Noozhawk Today

You are an important ally in our mission to deliver clear, objective, high-quality professional news reporting for Santa Barbara, Goleta and the rest of Santa Barbara County. Join the Hawks Club today to help keep Noozhawk soaring.

We offer four membership levels: $5 a month, $10 a month, $25 a month or $1 a week. Payments can be made through PayPal below, or click here for information on recurring credit-card payments.

Thank you for your vital support.

Daily Noozhawk

Subscribe to Noozhawk's A.M. Report, our free e-Bulletin sent out every day at 4:15 a.m. with Noozhawk's top stories, hand-picked by the editors.

Sign Up Now >