Pixel Tracker

Tuesday, December 18 , 2018, 10:12 am | Partly Cloudy 61º


Santa Maria Council Still Deadlocked on Filling Fifth Seat

Members disagree on whether to appoint a candidate or proceed with an application process

The Santa Maria City Council failed to agree Tuesday night on how to fill its fifth seat, which will remain vacant for at least another three weeks until the council meets again.

The four members of the new council didn’t seem to have changed their stances that forced them to deadlock and then continue the matter from last month’s meeting.

Mayor Alice Patino and City Councilman Bob Orach reiterated strong feelings Tuesday night in favor of immediately filling the remaining two years of Patino’s four-year term by appointing Etta Waterfield, who narrowly lost her election bid for the council as the third-highest vote-getter.

City Councilwoman Terri Zuniga and City Councilman Jack Boysen leaned toward accepting applications to review and subsequently fill the spot before the Feb. 16 deadline.

The council was again deadlocked 2-2 in favor of an application process. Council members voted 4-0 to continue the matter once more until the Feb. 5 meeting.

The dozen community members who shared their views were equally divided on the best, fair way to fill the seat.

Six speakers were for appointing Mike Cordero, who stepped down from his council seat last month after an unsuccessful bid for mayor.

Four others wanted to immediately appoint Waterfield because she was pushed out for third place by just two votes, and about the same number said they preferred an interview and application process or special election that would cost taxpayers thousands of dollars.

“It’s time for this City Council to get on with business,” one native Santa Marian said in support of Waterfield. “It’s time to get the politics out of the way.”

Many urged Zuniga to break the stalemate because they would have been fighting for her if she had come in third place instead of first in November’s election.

Another community member equated November’s race to a sporting event, saying, “Whether you lose by one point or 30 points, you lost.”

Cordero also spoke, saying he was humbled by so many endorsements.

“I want to just renew my interest in being reappointed,” he said.

Haydon noted that another option the council has is taking no action, which would leave just four council members on the dais until the next election in December 2014.

Council members said they’ve lost sleep over the matter and have been stopped on the street by many citizens concerned with their inability to act.

Zuniga called the application process the “most transparent” process.

Patino and Orach said they did not want to “shaft” the 9,217 voters who wanted Waterfield on the council.

“I think the votes have been cast,” Patino said, noting that she voted for Waterfield. “I think that we need to do an appointment. I would like to do that appointment tonight. I don’t really know what the definition is of the best qualified. I think we need to get going with business of the city and not be polarized.”

After the application process deadlock, City Attorney Gilbert Trujillo cautioned council members that “any interested person” could demand and prompt a special election if the council takes no action, according to law.

As a final attempt at compromise, Boysen threw in the name Gayle Pratt, a recreation parks commissioner, for an immediate appointment vote.

The council deadlocked again, with Boysen and Zuniga in favor of the appointment and Patino and Orach against.

Haydon suggested that the council continue the meeting once more to see if any other applicant names could be put up for a vote.

“We’ve been here before,” Boysen said. “Is there any need to continue this item?”

Haydon said other names could come up, citing that Orach had earlier mentioned that the recently retired mayor Larry Lavagnino would make a good addition to the council.

“Otherwise, you’re boxed into a corner,” Haydon said.

Noozhawk staff writer Gina Potthoff can be reached at .(JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address). Follow Noozhawk on Twitter: @noozhawk, @NoozhawkNews and @NoozhawkBiz. Connect with Noozhawk on Facebook.

Support Noozhawk Today

You are an important ally in our mission to deliver clear, objective, high-quality professional news reporting for Santa Barbara, Goleta and the rest of Santa Barbara County. Join the Hawks Club today to help keep Noozhawk soaring.

We offer four membership levels: $5 a month, $10 a month, $25 a month or $1 a week. Payments can be made using a credit card, Apple Pay or Google Pay, or click here for information on recurring credit-card payments and a mailing address for checks.

Thank you for your vital support.

Become a Noozhawk Supporter

First name
Last name
Select your monthly membership
Or choose an annual membership

Payment Information

Membership Subscription

You are enrolling in . Thank you for joining the Hawks Club.

Payment Method

Pay by Credit Card:

Mastercard, Visa, American Express, Discover
One click only, please!

Pay with Apple Pay or Google Pay:

Noozhawk partners with Stripe to provide secure invoicing and payments processing.
You may cancel your membership at any time by sending an email to .(JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address).

  • Ask
  • Vote
  • Investigate
  • Answer

Noozhawk Asks: What’s Your Question?

Welcome to Noozhawk Asks, a new feature in which you ask the questions, you help decide what Noozhawk investigates, and you work with us to find the answers.

Here’s how it works: You share your questions with us in the nearby box. In some cases, we may work with you to find the answers. In others, we may ask you to vote on your top choices to help us narrow the scope. And we’ll be regularly asking you for your feedback on a specific issue or topic.

We also expect to work together with the reader who asked the winning questions to find the answer together. Noozhawk’s objective is to come at questions from a place of curiosity and openness, and we believe a transparent collaboration is the key to achieve it.

The results of our investigation will be published here in this Noozhawk Asks section. Once or twice a month, we plan to do a review of what was asked and answered.

Thanks for asking!

Click Here to Get Started >

Reader Comments

Noozhawk is no longer accepting reader comments on our articles. Click here for the announcement. Readers are instead invited to submit letters to the editor by emailing them to [email protected]. Please provide your full name and community, as well as contact information for verification purposes only.