Pixel Tracker

Tuesday, December 11 , 2018, 10:37 am | Fair 63º

 
 
 
 

Supervisors Approve Increase in Planning Processing Fees

County officials say the $30-per-hour rate hike will offset raises in staff salaries and benefits

The Santa Barbara County Board of Supervisors voted 3-2 on Tuesday to approve a $30-per-hour rate increase in planning processing fees, despite wide opposition from an advisory committee and local residents involved in the construction industry.

The $182-per-hour rate is meant to offset Planning and Development Department staff salary and benefit increases, department director Glenn Russell said.

Projects that require discretionary permits include most new buildings and any that are reviewed by a hearing body, and the increased fees don’t apply to building, electrical or grading permits.

The staff urged the board to approve the new fee Tuesday because it had to be included before next week’s budget submission.

Departments are given the information about salary and benefit increases each year by the auditor-controller’s office, and they have no control over the figures, Russell said.

Other options mentioned by the staff included reducing staff and services, increasing efficiency, subsidizing permit costs with general fund money and reducing the number of permits required per project.

Staff said cutting the number of employees and streamlining the processes wouldn’t decrease the hourly rate — they most likely would decrease both the cost and customer service quality to builders. Since 2000, the department’s staff has gone from 185 employees to 94.

The oversight committee, which included many industry stakeholders, rejected the fee increase and called it “inopportune,” according to staff.

Suggestions from the committee members included reducing salary and benefits, putting a halt to long-term planning and outsourcing the review of private development projects.

The supervisors noted, however, that salary reductions can’t be renegotiated between contracts.

With at least seven bargaining units, the county can’t cut salaries and benefits “willy-nilly,” Third District Supervisor Doreen Farr said.

The costs include salary, health care, retirement, vacation and sick leave.

While building and grading work has exceeded the department’s expectations, discretionary permit applications have dropped to a very low level, Russell said.

The estimated $526,000 revenue gained from the fee increase is based on a conservative estimate of how much work will be done by staff — which comes out to about 55.5 hours per week at $182 per hour.

The revenue will be split between the current and next fiscal years, Russell said.

Typically, a project has a project manager, a supervisor and often a specialist involved, who all bill hours to the applicant.

Many people expressed concern that the higher fee would be a deterrent to builders and put more people out of work, as there’s already trepidation about starting a project in this economical climate.

Debbie Cox Bultan of the Coastal Housing Coalition criticized the timing of the increase, given that unemployment is high — especially in construction trades.

Joe Armendariz, a Carpinteria city councilman who spoke on behalf of the Santa Barbara County Taxpayers Association, said the choice to raise fees was just that, and not something the supervisors were forced into. He and other speakers saw the move as a way to tell private industry to subsidize public employees.

The supervisors were split on the fee, with Joni Gray and Joe Centeno voting against it.

Gray, who represents the fourth district, said it made her “ill” and thought the item was a misprint when she saw it on the agenda.

Centeno, the fifth district supervisor, said the costs shouldn’t be passed onto the private sector when it was the county that negotiated the increased salaries and benefits. “I’m not going down this path,” he said.

First District Supervisor Salud Carbajal saw it as a clear choice between raising fees and using general fund money to subsidize costs, so he voted in favor of the increase.

Board chairwoman Janet Wolf, of the second district, was the tiebreaker, saying it was a “reasonable course” to raise fees and expects other jurisdictions to follow suit.

The city of Santa Barbara has the highest known planning processing rate in the Tri-Counties, at $200 per hour, according to staff, although some jurisdictions may subsidize their rates with general funds.

San Luis Obispo County charges $133 per hour, Ventura County charges $155.53 per hour and the city of Santa Maria charges $65.3 per hour.

Noozhawk staff writer Giana Magnoli can be reached at .(JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address).

Support Noozhawk Today

You are an important ally in our mission to deliver clear, objective, high-quality professional news reporting for Santa Barbara, Goleta and the rest of Santa Barbara County. Join the Hawks Club today to help keep Noozhawk soaring.

We offer four membership levels: $5 a month, $10 a month, $25 a month or $1 a week. Payments can be made using a credit card, Apple Pay or Google Pay, or click here for information on recurring credit-card payments and a mailing address for checks.

Thank you for your vital support.

Become a Noozhawk Supporter

First name
Last name
Email
Select your monthly membership
Or choose an annual membership
×

Payment Information

Membership Subscription

You are enrolling in . Thank you for joining the Hawks Club.

Payment Method

Pay by Credit Card:

Mastercard, Visa, American Express, Discover
One click only, please!

Pay with Apple Pay or Google Pay:

Noozhawk partners with Stripe to provide secure invoicing and payments processing.
You may cancel your membership at any time by sending an email to .(JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address).

  • Ask
  • Vote
  • Investigate
  • Answer

Noozhawk Asks: What’s Your Question?

Welcome to Noozhawk Asks, a new feature in which you ask the questions, you help decide what Noozhawk investigates, and you work with us to find the answers.

Here’s how it works: You share your questions with us in the nearby box. In some cases, we may work with you to find the answers. In others, we may ask you to vote on your top choices to help us narrow the scope. And we’ll be regularly asking you for your feedback on a specific issue or topic.

We also expect to work together with the reader who asked the winning questions to find the answer together. Noozhawk’s objective is to come at questions from a place of curiosity and openness, and we believe a transparent collaboration is the key to achieve it.

The results of our investigation will be published here in this Noozhawk Asks section. Once or twice a month, we plan to do a review of what was asked and answered.

Thanks for asking!

Click Here to Get Started >

Reader Comments

Noozhawk is no longer accepting reader comments on our articles. Click here for the announcement. Readers are instead invited to submit letters to the editor by emailing them to [email protected]. Please provide your full name and community, as well as contact information for verification purposes only.