Pixel Tracker

Tuesday, December 11 , 2018, 10:54 am | Fair 63º

 
 
 
 

Debate Continues Over Goleta’s Proposed Detachment from GWSD

Conflicting financial reports and responses remain at the forefront

In the back-and-forth detachment debate of the Goleta West Sanitary District, each side has used financial consultants to advocate for or against detachment.

After the city of Goleta filed to detach from Goleta West, the district hired consultants to do a report evaluating the financial outcome of detachment.

The city then created its own report, by Bartle Wells Associates, that refuted much of Goleta West’s report. It concluded that it would fiscally benefit the city to detach and would not imply raised rates for residents.

At Goleta West’s board meeting Tuesday night, Raftelis Financial Consultants presented an analysis of the city’s financial report that centered on pointing out questionable conclusions of the Bartle Wells report. In short, it was an analysis of a report that was a response to its report.

The two reports used different fiscal years as a basis, and there’s a wide discrepancy in the numbers. Goleta has found that detachment would be a boon to the city’s finances, while Goleta West has found the conclusions to be based on unsupported assumptions.

The “questionable” assumptions included overlooking the revenue neutrality agreement, all property taxes being used for sewer enterprise instead of general services, underestimated post-detachment costs and overestimating cost savings.

As presented by Sudhir Pardiwala of Raftelis, the city assumes that its revenue neutrality agreement with the county will be renegotiated so that all property tax revenue will go to the city upon detachment.

As of now, the county would get a large portion of the taxes, and district counsel Steve Amerikaner said he doubts the county would give up that additional revenue during these economic times.

Bartle Wells consultants also presented incorrect estimates for future operating and maintenance costs, capital project costs and district reserve balances, Pardiwala said.

Board members held a constant conversation with Pardiwala as they asked questions about the discrepancies between the reports. Dr. Dave Bearman found the differences “troubling,” and all members at Tuesday’s meeting said they felt that the city’s report didn’t accurately portray the financial outcome of detachment.

They also doubted that Goleta could provide sewer service any better than their district, which has served a portion of Goleta, Isla Vista and EMID for more than 50 years.

“The city chastised us for using property tax funds, and now the city wants to do the same thing,” Craig Geyer said.

There has been no direct communication between Goleta and Goleta West, and no city representatives attended Tuesday’s board meeting.

The city of Goleta has talked about detaching from the Goleta West Sanitary District since its incorporation in 2002, but it’s weeks away from having the detachment go before the Local Agency Formation Commission.

LAFCO has the final say in detachment and the allocation of reserve funds if it’s approved. The issue is expected to be addressed in its March meeting.

Regardless of detachment, Goleta West must contribute $20 million to the Goleta Sanitary District’s wastewater treatment plant upgrade.

Notes from the Raftelis analysis of the Bartle Wells report:

» Rate increases for residents would increase in the next few years, but Bartle Wells expected a large, one-time increase while Raftelis expects more gradual increases over a five-year period.

» The EMID is currently served by Goleta West, though it’s out of its coverage boundary area. After detachment, Goleta West assumes that the city would take on coverage, while Goleta assumes that the district would continue its coverage.

» Capital project costs are underestimated by Bartle Wells, especially in calculating the cost of pipe replacement.

Noozhawk staff writer Giana Magnoli can be reached at .(JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address).

Support Noozhawk Today

You are an important ally in our mission to deliver clear, objective, high-quality professional news reporting for Santa Barbara, Goleta and the rest of Santa Barbara County. Join the Hawks Club today to help keep Noozhawk soaring.

We offer four membership levels: $5 a month, $10 a month, $25 a month or $1 a week. Payments can be made using a credit card, Apple Pay or Google Pay, or click here for information on recurring credit-card payments and a mailing address for checks.

Thank you for your vital support.

Become a Noozhawk Supporter

First name
Last name
Email
Select your monthly membership
Or choose an annual membership
×

Payment Information

Membership Subscription

You are enrolling in . Thank you for joining the Hawks Club.

Payment Method

Pay by Credit Card:

Mastercard, Visa, American Express, Discover
One click only, please!

Pay with Apple Pay or Google Pay:

Noozhawk partners with Stripe to provide secure invoicing and payments processing.
You may cancel your membership at any time by sending an email to .(JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address).

  • Ask
  • Vote
  • Investigate
  • Answer

Noozhawk Asks: What’s Your Question?

Welcome to Noozhawk Asks, a new feature in which you ask the questions, you help decide what Noozhawk investigates, and you work with us to find the answers.

Here’s how it works: You share your questions with us in the nearby box. In some cases, we may work with you to find the answers. In others, we may ask you to vote on your top choices to help us narrow the scope. And we’ll be regularly asking you for your feedback on a specific issue or topic.

We also expect to work together with the reader who asked the winning questions to find the answer together. Noozhawk’s objective is to come at questions from a place of curiosity and openness, and we believe a transparent collaboration is the key to achieve it.

The results of our investigation will be published here in this Noozhawk Asks section. Once or twice a month, we plan to do a review of what was asked and answered.

Thanks for asking!

Click Here to Get Started >

Reader Comments

Noozhawk is no longer accepting reader comments on our articles. Click here for the announcement. Readers are instead invited to submit letters to the editor by emailing them to [email protected]. Please provide your full name and community, as well as contact information for verification purposes only.