Tuesday, October 17 , 2017, 2:45 pm | Fair 84º

 
 
 
 

Local News

Santa Ynez Chumash Let Public Weigh In on Proposed Camp 4 Project

Discussion turns heated as tribal officials present nine options for developing the 1,390-acre parcel along Highway 246

An effort by the Santa Ynez Band of Chumash Indians to start a dialogue with the public Monday night about how to best develop housing on its land turned into a springboard for opponents who don’t want to see the development at all.

The Chumash hosted the well-attended meeting at the Hotel Corque in Solvang to present proposed options for developing Camp 4, a 1,390-acre parcel of land adjacent to the reservation along Highway 246 in the Santa Ynez Valley. The tribe bought the land in 2010 from the late Fess Parker to build homes for tribal members.

While the tribe goes through a federal legislative process to place the land in a trust, Chumash officials decided to give the public a chance to offer opinions for the best way to develop the 143-home development.

In all, the Chumash presented nine options conceived during a land-use analysis, each considering varying levels of density, topography, community attributes and preservation of natural beauty.

“The purpose of purchasing Camp 4 was for tribal housing,” tribal chairman Vincent Armenta said. “When we bought it, we said the exact same thing. This is the start of a great dialogue.”

The first option called for five-acre parcels for each home, another created buffers at all roadways by placing a development in the middle of the land, and others called for one-acre lots in varying corners to preserve some natural attributes.

Steve Davis, vice president of Summit Project Management, said each of the plans except the five-acre lot would preserve the vineyards, wetlands and other natural features.

“We want to respect and avoid developing in these areas and compromising these features,” Davis said.

Some community members seemed grateful for the PowerPoint presentation, but most wanted further guarantees from the Chumash that a casino would not be built on the land. Others called for the tribe to go through the county’s land-use process like everyone else who owns and wants to build on land.

During a question-and-answer session facilitated by Assemblyman Das Williams, D-Santa Barbara, local residents voiced concerns about the increase in traffic and where water for the development would come from.

Williams urged citizens to put politics aside to choose the least upsetting housing plan.

“There could be no plan here that is perfect, but I think it would still help the tribe and the conversation if some of the options were taken off the table early in this process,” Williams said. “I don’t like it either, but it’s going to happen. I don’t think having a conversation about how to minimize those impacts is a bad thing.”

A speaker who said he was born and raised in Santa Barbara praised the Chumash’s efforts to be transparent in such a contentious issue.

“There are some people in life who are never truly happy unless they are protesting something,” he said.

Community members expressed an uneasiness about the land going into trust, which would mean the county loses out on potential property taxes and the power of developmental review.

Sam Cohen, government affairs and legal officer for the Chumash, reiterated that federal law prohibits the tribe from opening a casino on the land.

He said the tribe already has delivered a cooperative agreement to the county, offering to pay $1 million a year for 10 years.

“Actually, tribes feel like they don’t get special treatment at all,” Cohen said during the sometimes heated discussion. “It often feels we get treated in special ways, but not in a way that’s fair or favorable. The tribe is hosting this meeting, and I personally promise we will host future meetings.”

Armenta abruptly ended the meeting about 90 minutes in after dialogue had seemingly turned unconstructive. He said he looked forward to a more productive discussion during a future meeting.

Noozhawk staff writer Gina Potthoff can be reached at .(JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address). Follow Noozhawk on Twitter: @noozhawk, @NoozhawkNews and @NoozhawkBiz. Connect with Noozhawk on Facebook.

  • Ask
  • Vote
  • Investigate
  • Answer

Noozhawk Asks: What’s Your Question?

Welcome to Noozhawk Asks, a new feature in which you ask the questions, you help decide what Noozhawk investigates, and you work with us to find the answers.

Here’s how it works: You share your questions with us in the nearby box. In some cases, we may work with you to find the answers. In others, we may ask you to vote on your top choices to help us narrow the scope. And we’ll be regularly asking you for your feedback on a specific issue or topic.

We also expect to work together with the reader who asked the winning questions to find the answer together. Noozhawk’s objective is to come at questions from a place of curiosity and openness, and we believe a transparent collaboration is the key to achieve it.

The results of our investigation will be published here in this Noozhawk Asks section. Once or twice a month, we plan to do a review of what was asked and answered.

Thanks for asking!

Click here to get started >

Support Noozhawk Today

You are an important ally in our mission to deliver clear, objective, high-quality professional news reporting for Santa Barbara, Goleta and the rest of Santa Barbara County. Join the Hawks Club today to help keep Noozhawk soaring.

We offer four membership levels: $5 a month, $10 a month, $25 a month or $1 a week. Payments can be made through PayPal below, or click here for information on recurring credit-card payments.

Thank you for your vital support.



Daily Noozhawk

Subscribe to Noozhawk's A.M. Report, our free e-Bulletin sent out every day at 4:15 a.m. with Noozhawk's top stories, hand-picked by the editors.

Sign Up Now >