Wednesday, June 20 , 2018, 9:29 am | Overcast with Haze 61º


Santa Barbara District Discusses GATE Testing Changes to Help Disadvantaged Students

The Santa Barbara Unified School District has been testing students by recommendation to identify Gifted and Talented Education (GATE) students in the past, but leaders want to change that to help underrepresented groups be included in the program.

In a presentation to the Board of Education this week, Emilio Handall, assistant superintendent of elementary education, said that only 2 percent of elementary English learners, 5 percent of Hispanic students and 5 percent of socio-economically disadvantaged students are GATE identified.

There are GATE programs at every school site, but the elementary GATE magnet program is at Washington Elementary, where an entire classroom is filled with GATE-qualified students.

Typically, parents or teachers recommend that a student be tested for GATE — the district doesn’t do blanket testing, as the Carpinteria Unified School District does for all second-graders, said Harriet Whaley, SBUSD’s GATE identification coordinator. The administration proposes testing all second-graders next year.

Students get recognized or identified using criteria, or a parent can push to have a student assessed, and the district is not seeing that happen with some historically-disadvantaged subgroups, she said. The district tested 279 Latino students in 2012 — the most to date — but only qualified 35 for GATE.

“Even though the district tested almost 100 more Latino students last year, we only qualified three more for GATE — that’s a big problem,” Whaley said.

Furthermore, Latino students had the lowest qualifying rate in 2012. Only 10 percent of Latino students — English-only and English learner students — who were tested qualified, while 14 percent of English learners and 24 percent of non-Latino students qualified.

The Santa Barbara district uses the CogAT — Cognitive Abilities Test — and Whaley concluded that is the best tool to identify English-learner GATE students. However, studies have shown a consistent difference between scores of English learners and non-EL students.

“A study of 2,000 English learner students in Texas concluded the average difference between EL and non-EL students was twice as large on the CogAT verbal section (16.6 points) as on the CogAT nonverbal battery (8.3 points),” Whaley said in her presentation.

If 2012, GATE scores were adjusted for the differences seen in the Texas study, and 64 Santa Barbara Unified Latino students would have qualified instead of 35, Whaley said. The district is going to retroactively qualify those 29 students.

GATE program regulations aim to find students from different linguistic, cultural and economic backgrounds, so the administration recommended that the district alter how it identifies GATE English learner candidates based on the Texas study and criteria, and start testing all second-graders starting next year. 

While Tuesday’s presentation talked about the GATE program status quo, Superintendent Dave Cash said he believes the administration will be coming forward with “some more substantive things” in the future.

To give the board a different perspective, Teresa Koontz, a SBUSD GATE coordinator for the elementary schools and a tester at Carpinteria Unified, explained how things are done at the neighboring district. She said Carpinteria tests all second-graders with the Ravens test, which is nonverbal and takes 45 minutes, instead of the four-hour test SBUSD uses.

Carpinteria also considers California Standards Test scores and teacher recommendations to see if students could work at the level of the program, she said. She collaborates with school districts in Santa Maria and Oxnard, too, and all districts are struggling to identify English learners and compare notes, she noted.

Board member Kate Parker asked the district to think about support for families and students as more English learners and Hispanic students are tested for the program.

Board members also asked about test preparations by parents who want their children to be admitted to GATE.

“I know members of the community are preparing for taking this test, some are paying to get help — that in and of itself creates inequity,” board member Monique Limon said. “How much GATE-ness does it really test if someone has the means to prepare for this test?”

In response, Cash said: “That’s a good question, and I think that it goes to a key question — whether or not the GATE program is for gifted and talented students or something else.”

Whaley said tutoring was a real problem in the district in the past few years. Students would remark that they “remember this problem” while taking the test — but not as much lately.

“The protocol for the test requires a signature from parents saying they haven’t prepped their student to take the test,” Whaley said, “and I can tell you from the number qualifying, it was an issue several years ago.”

Noozhawk staff writer Giana Magnoli can be reached at .(JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address). Follow Noozhawk on Twitter: @noozhawk, @NoozhawkNews and @NoozhawkBiz. Connect with Noozhawk on Facebook.

Support Noozhawk Today

You are an important ally in our mission to deliver clear, objective, high-quality professional news reporting for Santa Barbara, Goleta and the rest of Santa Barbara County. Join the Hawks Club today to help keep Noozhawk soaring.

We offer four membership levels: $5 a month, $10 a month, $25 a month or $1 a week. Payments can be made through PayPal below, or click here for information on recurring credit-card payments.

Thank you for your vital support.

Become a Noozhawk Supporter

First name
Last name
Enter your email
Select your membership level

Payment Information

You are purchasing:

Payment Method

Pay by Credit Card:

Mastercard, Visa, American Express, Discover

Pay with Apple Pay or Google Pay:

Noozhawk partners with Stripe to provide secure invoicing and payments processing.

  • Ask
  • Vote
  • Investigate
  • Answer

Noozhawk Asks: What’s Your Question?

Welcome to Noozhawk Asks, a new feature in which you ask the questions, you help decide what Noozhawk investigates, and you work with us to find the answers.

Here’s how it works: You share your questions with us in the nearby box. In some cases, we may work with you to find the answers. In others, we may ask you to vote on your top choices to help us narrow the scope. And we’ll be regularly asking you for your feedback on a specific issue or topic.

We also expect to work together with the reader who asked the winning questions to find the answer together. Noozhawk’s objective is to come at questions from a place of curiosity and openness, and we believe a transparent collaboration is the key to achieve it.

The results of our investigation will be published here in this Noozhawk Asks section. Once or twice a month, we plan to do a review of what was asked and answered.

Thanks for asking!

Click Here to Get Started >

Reader Comments

Noozhawk is no longer accepting reader comments on our articles. Click here for the announcement. Readers are instead invited to submit letters to the editor by emailing them to [email protected]. Please provide your full name and community, as well as contact information for verification purposes only.

Daily Noozhawk

Subscribe to Noozhawk's A.M. Report, our free e-Bulletin sent out every day at 4:15 a.m. with Noozhawk's top stories, hand-picked by the editors.

Sign Up Now >