Tuesday, October 25 , 2016, 8:31 pm | Fair 59º


Lou Cannon: Earthquake in Haiti Portends Need for Low-Cost Insurance Here

Devastation a difficult reminder that it can happen here, and our economic price could be much worse

The human suffering caused by the earthquake in Haiti has touched the sensibilities of people throughout the world. Vivid media coverage has brought the horror and hunger of Haiti — along with occasional glimmers of hope — into the living rooms of Americans. This in turn has produced an outpouring of hundreds of million dollars in charitable contributions, exceeding even the donations after the destructive Indian Ocean tsunami of 2004, as well as American volunteers who have provided medical and humanitarian aid and may eventually assist in the rebuilding of Haiti.

Lou Cannon
Lou Cannon

The Haitian earthquake is a reminder that natural calamity can strike anywhere at any time. In California, the long-expected “Big One” is a matter of when, not if. A 2007 scientific study determined that California has a 99.7 percent chance of an earthquake of 6.7 magnitude within 30 years and a nearly even chance of a quake of 7.5 magnitude or greater within 30 years.

Buildings in California are generally less flimsy than in Haiti, but a major earthquake nonetheless would probably cause widespread destruction, disrupt ground transportation, and sever gas and water lines. A “shakeout earthquake scenario,” issued by seismologists in 2008, said that a likely 7.8 quake on the southern San Andreas Fault would kill 1,800 people and injure another 50,000. It would also destroy thousands of homes, most of them uninsured for earthquakes.

Except for San Francisco in 1906, where 3,000 people died from an earthquake of an estimated 7.7 magnitude, most of them in the resulting fire, the United States has been fortunate in that its largest quakes have occurred in sparsely populated areas.

The Great Alaska Earthquake of 1964 had a magnitude of 9.2 and might have killed or injured hundreds of thousands in an urban setting. The death toll from the quake and resulting tsunamis was 131.

Geologists believe that even more severe quakes, three of them, occurred on the New Madrid Fault in southeast Missouri, about 175 miles from St. Louis, in 1811 and 1812. Since almost no one lived there at the time, casualties were minimal.

In this century the most devastating natural disaster in the United States was not an earthquake but Hurricane Katrina, which in 2005 claimed more than 1,800 lives and devastated the Gulf Coast from central Florida to Texas, leaving scars that remain especially visible in New Orleans. The phrase “natural disaster” does not tell the full story. The neglect of the levees that were supposed to protect New Orleans as well as the channeling of the Mississippi River and the erosion of the barrier reefs by oil drilling were man-made invitations to disaster. It could happen again. Nor is the threat of breached levees limited to Louisiana; more than half the nation’s counties have levees, some in disrepair. Both the Atlantic and Gulf coasts face a perennial threat from hurricanes. This year’s early forecast puts the chance of a major hurricane making landfall at 40 percent.

Natural calamities cannot be prevented, but public policies can be devised that enable survivors to rebuild their homes and lives.

“Many people have a false expectation that the federal government will come swooping in after a disaster,” said Glenn Pomeroy, who heads the California Earthquake Authority. “That usually doesn’t happen.”

Pomeroy knows what he’s talking about. He was North Dakota state insurance commissioner in April 1997 when the swollen Red River surged over its banks and flooded much of Grand Forks, N.D. Residents with flood insurance were able to rebuild, while many of the uninsured could not.

It would be worse in California after a major urban earthquake; only 12 percent of Californians with homeowners insurance also have quake insurance, most of it by the California Earthquake Authority (CEA). This quasi-public agency was established after the Jan. 17, 1994, Northridge earthquake, a magnitude 6.7 temblor that killed 72 people, severed gas and water lines, and knocked seven freeways out of service.

Your columnist covered this calamity as a reporter for The Washington Post and has enduring memories of a grim scene at the Northridge Meadows apartments, where I watched bodies being pulled from the wreckage of a building in which the second and third floors had collapsed on the first, killing people in their sleep. Sixteen people, many elderly, died in this one apartment building, which was un-reinforced and perched on top of a parking area. The California Seismic Safety Commission says such buildings are inherently unsound and are prevalent throughout the state.

Earthquake insurance in California, where a majority of residents live within 20 miles of a major fault, has been problematic since its inception. Premiums for this insurance, sold through the CEA through commercial companies, cost several hundred dollars a year and the deductible is 15 percent of the home’s insured value. Even homeowners with insurance would face substantial out-of-pocket expenses after an earthquake. Overall, according to a CEA estimate, a maximum of 10 percent of residential losses and 20 percent of commercial losses would be covered by insurance after a projected 7.2 quake on the Hayward Fault in Northern California. In Katrina, slightly more than half the losses were covered by insurance, including payouts from the National Flood Insurance Program.

A principal barrier to providing affordable earthquake insurance in California and affordable storm-damage insurance in the Gulf Coast states is the high cost of reinsurance, which insurance companies buy to protect themselves from claims they can’t meet. In California, 40 cents of every dollar charged for earthquake insurance is spent on reinsurance. To reduce premiums, the CEA is seeking a federal guarantee for bonds that could be sold to reimburse losses after a major earthquake. If the earthquake authority had this power — guaranteeing bond sales with the full faith and credit of the federal government — it could reduce premiums and deductible amounts for earthquake insurance. This in turn would enable millions of uninsured Californians to buy such insurance.

Three of the Gulf Coast states — Florida, Louisiana and Texas — have quasi-public agencies similar to CEA to provide insurance from storm damage. The Louisiana Citizens Property Insurance Corp. sold $1 billion worth of bonds after Katrina to provide reimbursements for its 125,000 policy holders.

“It would be a question in today’s financial markets if we could sell these bonds as readily without a federal guarantee,” said John Wortman, chief operating officer of Louisiana Citizens.

Legislation to provide such a guarantee had been introduced in the U.S. Senate by the four senators from California and Florida and in the house by Rep. Loretta Sanchez, D-Calif., with several co-sponsors. Backers of the bill recognize that it may be an uphill struggle to obtain congressional passage of the measure in the tempestuous political environment of an election year. By starting now, they hope to win approval by 2011.

The legislation, known as the Catastrophe Obligation Guarantee Act (COGA) is no giveaway. An evaluation (“scoring”) by the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office found it would cost $25 million over 10 years, a small amount in comparison to the billions of dollars that would be required for rebuilding a state shattered by an earthquake or a hurricane. The legislation has a safeguard: any public entity that seeks a federal guarantee for bond sales would need pre-certification from the U.S. Treasury that it is charging sound rates for its insurance products.

In a year when the domestic headlines are dominated by the economy and the uncertain fate of health care reform, COGA is a backburner item. But Haiti is a reminder that we never know when and where disaster will strike. The Big One is coming, and we should prepare for its aftermath.

— Summerland resident Lou Cannon is a longtime national political writer and acclaimed presidential biographer. His most recent book — co-authored with his son, Carl — is Reagan’s Disciple: George W. Bush’s Troubled Quest for a Presidential Legacy. Cannon also is an editorial adviser to State Net Capitol Journal, which published this column originally.

Reader Comments

Noozhawk's intent is not to limit the discussion of our stories but to elevate it. Comments should be relevant and must be free of profanity and abusive language and attacks.

By posting on Noozhawk, you:

» Agree to be respectful. Noozhawk encourages intelligent and impassioned discussion and debate, but now has a zero-tolerance policy for those who cannot express their opinions in a civil manner.

» Agree not to use Noozhawk’s forums for personal attacks. This includes any sort of personal attack — including, but not limited to, the people in our stories, the journalists who create these stories, fellow readers who comment on our stories, or anyone else in our community.

» Agree not to post on Noozhawk any comments that can be construed as libelous, defamatory, obscene, profane, vulgar, harmful, threatening, tortious, harassing, abusive, hateful, sexist, racially or ethnically objectionable, or that are invasive of another’s privacy.

» Agree not to post in a manner than emulates, purports or pretends to be someone else. Under no circumstances are readers posting to Noozhawk to knowingly use the name or identity of another person, whether that is another reader on this site, a public figure, celebrity, elected official or fictitious character. This also means readers will not knowingly give out any personal information of other members of these forums.

» Agree not to solicit others. You agree you will not use Noozhawk’s forums to solicit and/or advertise for personal blogs and websites, without Noozhawk’s express written approval.

Noozhawk’s management and editors, in our sole discretion, retain the right to remove individual posts or to revoke the access privileges of anyone who we believe has violated any of these terms or any other term of this agreement; however, we are under no obligation to do so.

» on 02.01.10 @ 08:49 AM

The government didn’t do so good a job insuring mortgages Lou.  Why in hell do you think it would be any different with insuring houses against catastrophic damage?  There is no place in the Constitution that you’d find insurance - ditto for medical insurance.  The private sector is where this needs done, if it can be done.  Personally if I found an insurance company I owned got into this line of business, except on terms so favorable as to make homeowners unwilling to buy, I’d sell the stock.

» on 02.01.10 @ 01:25 PM

I would love to have public insurance. It seems that the rates would be so much lower than for-profit insurance. I think this is a very good thing for governments to do: provide safety, security, and services to its residents.

» on 02.01.10 @ 04:45 PM

Bob, have you every bothered to read the Constitution?  This insurance stuff does exist there.  You want to amend it to allow this stuff - let’s have the debate.  Otherwise the document is meaningless.

» on 02.01.10 @ 07:20 PM

Mr. Cannon means well. But he missed the mark on two key targets.

One. This is a great opportunity to demonstrate that the “private sector” can “fix”
Haiti faster than the U.N., the U.S., foreign nations, or non-profits like Direct Relief.

Karl Rove should immediately dispatch a “tiger team” of public, corporate and investment leaders to take charge of the recovery. It should include Alan Greenspan, Dick Cheney, Mitch McConnell, John Boehner, George (MBA) W. Bush, the CEOs of Goldman Sachs, BofA, Halliburton, and Justices Kennedy, Alito, and Roberts.

They will agree to remain in Haiti until “public order and public safety have been fully restored.”

Donald Rumsfeld will pre-estimate for them the amount of time needed to achieve all goals successfully.

Two. As soon as they’ve completed their first task (100 days?) they should re-form
themselves into an ad-hoc blue ribbon commission to determine why the number of private sector building “earthquake failures” exceeded those from the public sector?

While they’re away kicking bureaucrat, federal, and international butt in Haiti, why
not make Scott “The 41st Senator” Brown the acting Senate minority leader, and
let him begin immediate negotiations with Obama and Harry Reid on how to pass health care reform?

At the rate Congress is going, this latter task could be completed by, say ... 2020?

» on 02.02.10 @ 11:45 PM

It would be nice, we recently refinanced a property in town.  The lending institutions kept questioning us why we carry earthquake insurance like it was a bad thing.  I was told by them and commercial agents that hardly anyone carries it due to the cost.  We choose to bite the bullet and pay it just in case…

» on 02.03.10 @ 12:07 AM

This RKV person is pretty unconvincing. Rudeness sure don’t persuade.

The private sector is good at making money. That be their main mission, their raison d’etre. If anything humanitarian or socially beneficial comes out of it, its usually just a side effect. That be one thing Libertarians and free-market types are slow to see. And while charity is good, the problem is you can’t count on it and you can’t plan around it because at its core, it’s whimsical in nature.

Don’t blame the govt for insuring mortages RKV. Look instead at the private sector - yep, those financial geniuses that invented CDO’s and credit default swaps. And also the mortgage brokerage industry that sold all those toxic loans and resold them to feed Wall St. Where are those private sector hero’s now?!

p.s. Lou Canon has a good point. We need affordable quake coverage now.

» on 02.03.10 @ 02:30 AM

Insurance is a cooperative venture to share risk, where the members of the pool have similar risk. What you are calling insurance is actually welfare. It makes no difference if you are discussing Insurance for cars, TVs, fires, earthquake, health, life, whatever…

Do you also believe that the government should provide low-cost insurance to protect you from the death of your DVD player?

There is no such thing as a free lunch or low-cost anything. Everything that is low-cost is being partially paid for by someone else. For example, the free gourmet meals being served up to the Gourmet-in-chief are paid for with our tax dollars.

Glenn Pomeroy is wrong. California passed out checks to homeowners affected by the recent Northridge earthquake. There were two sick parts to the episode:
1. If you had purchased insurance you were left to deal with the insurance company by yourself, you got no check and no help.
2. It rewarded people for NOT buying earthquake insurance.

Earthquake insurance was available before the Northridge quake. Rates ;ater skyrocketed when the Insurance Companies found out how expensive a quake can be. We citizens demanded the government provide a low-cost “Public Option”, and that resulted in the creation of the California Earthquake Authority. The CEA has not yet been tested in the real world to see if it works. Will the CEA reduce the cost, to California State, of the next quake? Will if perform any better than the for-profit insurance compainies.

Now that we have a CEA, do we also need a CFA to subsidize Fire Insurance? And do we need a California Wind Authority to subsidize Wind damage.

Stay tuned - - -

» on 02.03.10 @ 12:39 PM

Cheap catastrophe insurance and adequate reserves to pay claims just don’t mix.  You cannot have your cake and eat it too in this circumstance.  If you want to pay $100 a year for quake insurance be prepared for your insurance company to go belly up when the next Northridge-type event happens because at such a low rate they’ll never collect enough money in premiums to pay your $200,000 claim along with the thousands of other claims.  It’s a pretty simple concept if you stop and think about it for a minute.

Support Noozhawk Today

You are an important ally in our mission to deliver clear, objective, high-quality professional news reporting for Santa Barbara, Goleta and the rest of Santa Barbara County. Join the Hawks Club today to help keep Noozhawk soaring.

We offer four membership levels: $5 a month, $10 a month, $25 a month or $1 a week. Payments can be made through PayPal below, or click here for information on recurring credit-card payments.

Thank you for your vital support.

Daily Noozhawk

Subscribe to Noozhawk's A.M. Report, our free e-Bulletin sent out every day at 4:15 a.m. with Noozhawk's top stories, hand-picked by the editors.

Sign Up Now >