Pixel Tracker

Wednesday, January 16 , 2019, 9:17 pm | Overcast 60º


Council Backtracks After Peabody School Parents Voice Concerns About Housing Authority Project

Councilman Randy Rowse requests that the council revisit last week's approval of a grant for a low-income development to allow for public input

After an uproar from parents of students at Peabody Charter School, the Santa Barbara City Council took a second look Tuesday at a grant it approved last week for eight units of low-income housing on Upper State Street.

Last Tuesday, the seemingly mundane item — a $1.15 million grant to the Housing Authority of the City of Santa Barbara for a project at 2904 State St. — took a surprise turn into a full-scale policy discussion about homelessness. The City Council eventually approved the grant to purchase the property, with Councilman Frank Hotchkiss and Councilwoman Michael Self voting against it.

After e-mails began circulating among parents from nearby Peabody school who felt left out of the process, Councilman Randy Rowse requested that the item be brought back to the council so that the public could have its say.

The project would provide eight units of housing and supportive services to formerly homeless people and would be operated by WillBridge, a Santa Barbara nonprofit that helps homeless people find housing.

After hours of public comment, however, the council came to a different conclusion than last week, voting unanimously to let the Housing Authority proceed with the financial portions of the project, but that leasing it to WillBridge would be contingent on the group having at least three public meetings with Peabody parents to hear their concerns. The group would come back in 90 days with a progress report, and the council would decide then whether to lease it WillBridge for formerly homeless people or the other option — to give the units to low-income people.

Rowse brought the project back before the council, so he was first on the dais to address it. Because the property’s use hadn’t changed, nearby residents weren’t required to be notified of the new tenants. Though no laws had been broken by not notifying residents, Rowse said he felt the city was called to higher standards than the private sector.

“I think this is a good project. But it’s not my neighborhood, it’s your neighborhood,” he told members of the public.

More information was available to the public Tuesday than had been the previous week, and residents began to get a clearer picture of who would be living in the units.

Lynnelle Williams, executive director of WillBridge, said the eight units would be for people looking for permanent supportive housing, not people directly off the streets. Unlike the transitional housing the program also offers, the State Street units would be used for people who have already been in housing for some time and are transitioning to the next phase of their lives.

Williams also presented a checklist of criteria that prospective residents must meet: Residents must be employed or enrolled in job training, pass a background check, agree to no drugs and alcohol on the premises, and have three personal references, among other criteria.

Two other WillBridge properties are in operation in other parts of the city, including one that is closer to Franklin Elementary School than the State Street project would be to Peabody.

Rob Pearson, executive director of the Housing Authority, began his statements by apologizing to the residents “who believe we’re pulling a fast one.” Dozens of projects with a similar mission have come through the approval process, without any uproar.

“For us, it was business as usual,” Pearson said. “We learned our lesson. ... Community input is important.”

Tuesday’s meeting had plenty of that input as nearly 40 San Roque residents, Peabody parents, homeless and mental health advocates, and even students from the school shared their thoughts with the council. From Peabody parents, the consensus seemed to center on the lack of notification. They also took issue with the proximity of the project to school. Most said they supported a facility of that type for the homeless, just not so close to an operating elementary school.

Peabody parent Craig Stewart said the area has experienced increased crime, tagging and a larger presence of homeless during the past 10 years. Principal Kate Ford said she was concerned about the campus being open, and thus becoming more like a public park in the evenings and on weekends. She said the homeless have wandered onto the property, frightening students.

“Our experience with the homeless has been less than positive,” Ford said. “It’s only reasonable that we have questions.”

Student Ben Spivak said he interviewed students from multiple grades and received similar answers when they were asked about the project.

“They said, ‘That’s too close, but a good idea,’” Spivak told the council.

In the future, the Housing Authority will need to relocate a detox facility from where it’s being housed at Casa Esperanza, and the council said that project could benefit from notifications as well. Pearson said projects that have any kind of “program” element, be it on-site mental health or drug and alcohol rehab services, the public should be notified.

Self asked Williams about a fire that occurred in the group’s Montecito Street facility on Jan. 20. A young woman had come to WillBridge from Casa Esperanza and had a “crisis situation,” Williams said, adding that no one was injured and there was minimal damage.

After considering all of the rigors residents will go through, Councilman Grant House asked Williams what would distinguish the residents from people already living in the neighborhood.

“There’s no distinguishing,” she said. “They go to the theater, they go to the ballet. ... They’ve established themselves very well.”

Councilman Dale Francisco said that in the past, the item would have been approved with little discussion from the council, and he was glad for the forum. He, too, said he has noticed an increase in panhandling in the area, but “I tend to think that the people sleeping in MacKenzie Park are going to be more of a problem than the (WillBridge) residents.”

The entire council agreed that increased notifications of sensitive projects would be a good thing going forward.

“Part of our problem is that we aren’t getting our message out,” Mayor Helene Schneider said, acknowledging that when the homeless do wander onto the school’s property, it can be scary for young children. Now, she said, the onus is on the nonprofit to reach out to the neighbors and convince them the eight units belong there.

“WillBridge is going to have to prove themselves to you,” Schneider told the audience.

Noozhawk staff writer Lara Cooper can be reached at .(JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address). Follow Noozhawk on Twitter: @noozhawk or @NoozhawkNews.

Support Noozhawk Today

You are an important ally in our mission to deliver clear, objective, high-quality professional news reporting for Santa Barbara, Goleta and the rest of Santa Barbara County. Join the Hawks Club today to help keep Noozhawk soaring.

We offer four membership levels: $5 a month, $10 a month, $25 a month or $1 a week. Payments can be made using a credit card, Apple Pay or Google Pay, or click here for information on recurring credit-card payments and a mailing address for checks.

Thank you for your vital support.

Become a Noozhawk Supporter

First name
Last name
Select your monthly membership
Or choose an annual membership

Payment Information

Membership Subscription

You are enrolling in . Thank you for joining the Hawks Club.

Payment Method

Pay by Credit Card:

Mastercard, Visa, American Express, Discover
One click only, please!

Pay with Apple Pay or Google Pay:

Noozhawk partners with Stripe to provide secure invoicing and payments processing.
You may cancel your membership at any time by sending an email to .(JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address).

  • Ask
  • Vote
  • Investigate
  • Answer

Noozhawk Asks: What’s Your Question?

Welcome to Noozhawk Asks, a new feature in which you ask the questions, you help decide what Noozhawk investigates, and you work with us to find the answers.

Here’s how it works: You share your questions with us in the nearby box. In some cases, we may work with you to find the answers. In others, we may ask you to vote on your top choices to help us narrow the scope. And we’ll be regularly asking you for your feedback on a specific issue or topic.

We also expect to work together with the reader who asked the winning questions to find the answer together. Noozhawk’s objective is to come at questions from a place of curiosity and openness, and we believe a transparent collaboration is the key to achieve it.

The results of our investigation will be published here in this Noozhawk Asks section. Once or twice a month, we plan to do a review of what was asked and answered.

Thanks for asking!

Click Here to Get Started >

Reader Comments

Noozhawk is no longer accepting reader comments on our articles. Click here for the announcement. Readers are instead invited to submit letters to the editor by emailing them to [email protected]. Please provide your full name and community, as well as contact information for verification purposes only.

Daily Noozhawk

Subscribe to Noozhawk's A.M. Report, our free e-Bulletin sent out every day at 4:15 a.m. with Noozhawk's top stories, hand-picked by the editors.

Sign Up Now >