Thursday, October 18 , 2018, 6:29 pm | Fair 69º

 
 
 

The Daily Capitalist: Is This the Change He Promised?

Obama may be president, but a pork-fed Congress appears to be calling his shots

I have the feeling that President Obama was surprised when the massive spending bill carried by House Democrats was unanimously opposed by House Republicans. He has stated several times that he thought he had significant “political capital.” As he famously said in a debate over the stimulus bill with Republican leaders, Republicans have to go along with his plan because, “I won.”

I don’t think he really anticipated the unanimous Republican backlash against the bill. As I pointed out in my column SmartGovernment™, Obama thinks the argument on big vs. small government is over and “we’re all Keynesians now.”

It struck me that this was naive of him. For all his supposed political savvy, and the behind the veil political smarts of his tough White House chief of staff, Rahm Emmanuel, this was a misstep.

What does this mean?

First I think it shows that House Speaker Nancy Pelosi and Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, not Obama, are in charge of the Democratic agenda. Maybe this isn’t fair to Obama since he just got into office. But I didn’t hear him say a word against the huge amount of pork the Democrats have loaded into the stimulus bill (well, it’s really all pork when you think about it). His only call was against earmarks — which has been gleefully ignored by the Democrats. He did complain about several of the more porkish spending programs, but only after they were publicized.

Second, where is the change that he promised? He can’t seriously believe that this is the government that “works,” as he promised in his bipartisan call at his inauguration. As reported in a CNN story:

“Much of the $550 billion in spending (as opposed to the tax-cut provisions) is divided among these areas: $142 billion for education, $111 billion for health care, $90 billion for infrastructure, $72 billion for aid and benefits, $54 billion for energy, $16 billion for science and technology, and $13 billion for housing.

It included things like $335 million in funding for education on sexually transmitted diseases and $650 million for digital TV coupons. This is supposed to get the economy going again? If government spending is so good at helping the economy, then why didn’t President George W. Bush’s expected $1.2 deficit create prosperity? It can’t and it won’t.

This isn’t government that works; it’s a liberal version of Willy Wonka & the Chocolate Factory.

This has got to be a bitter pill for all those middle-of-the-roaders who voted for Obama. I think they really thought he would bring real change.

Lastly, it shows his lack of understanding of economics. I will assume his unconcern about his porkish Democratic legislators is due to his belief that all the government has to do is spend, spend, spend and we’ll lift ourselves out of the recession. He must believe it really doesn’t matter what it’s spent on, as long as the government spends and injects money into the economy. This is rather classic Keynesian theory: pay someone to dig a hole and then pay someone to fill it.

In one Keynesian anecdote, John Maynard Keynes was in a washroom with another economist drying his hands, and to show his distaste of his friend’s fastidious folding of a towel, he reached over and messed up the entire neat pile of towels and said he had just done more to create jobs than anyone else. Of course, Keynes didn’t understand Bastiat’s simple lesson of broken window.

I had very much hoped that President Obama would live up to the change promised by Candidate Obama. So far he has not shown leadership, only rhetoric.

— Jeff Harding is a principal of Montecito Realty Investors LLC. A student of economics, he has a strong affinity for free-market economics. This commentary originally appeared on his blog, The Daily Capitalist, formerly the Subprime Crisis Forum.

Support Noozhawk Today

You are an important ally in our mission to deliver clear, objective, high-quality professional news reporting for Santa Barbara, Goleta and the rest of Santa Barbara County. Join the Hawks Club today to help keep Noozhawk soaring.

We offer four membership levels: $5 a month, $10 a month, $25 a month or $1 a week. Payments can be made using a credit card, Apple Pay or Google Pay, or click here for information on recurring credit-card payments and a mailing address for checks.

Thank you for your vital support.

Become a Noozhawk Supporter

First name
Last name
Email
Select your monthly membership
Or choose an annual membership
×

Payment Information

Membership Subscription

You are enrolling in . Thank you for joining the Hawks Club.

Payment Method

Pay by Credit Card:

Mastercard, Visa, American Express, Discover
One click only, please!

Pay with Apple Pay or Google Pay:

Noozhawk partners with Stripe to provide secure invoicing and payments processing.
You may cancel your membership at any time by sending an email to .(JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address).

  • Ask
  • Vote
  • Investigate
  • Answer

Noozhawk Asks: What’s Your Question?

Welcome to Noozhawk Asks, a new feature in which you ask the questions, you help decide what Noozhawk investigates, and you work with us to find the answers.

Here’s how it works: You share your questions with us in the nearby box. In some cases, we may work with you to find the answers. In others, we may ask you to vote on your top choices to help us narrow the scope. And we’ll be regularly asking you for your feedback on a specific issue or topic.

We also expect to work together with the reader who asked the winning questions to find the answer together. Noozhawk’s objective is to come at questions from a place of curiosity and openness, and we believe a transparent collaboration is the key to achieve it.

The results of our investigation will be published here in this Noozhawk Asks section. Once or twice a month, we plan to do a review of what was asked and answered.

Thanks for asking!

Click Here to Get Started >

Reader Comments

Noozhawk is no longer accepting reader comments on our articles. Click here for the announcement. Readers are instead invited to submit letters to the editor by emailing them to [email protected]. Please provide your full name and community, as well as contact information for verification purposes only.