Pixel Tracker

Saturday, March 23 , 2019, 8:23 am | A Few Clouds 46º

 
 
 
 

Randy Alcorn: Imperial Idiocies Imperil America

If Obama really wants to keep the U.S. strong, he should look to us first

In his recent State of the Union address, President Barack Obama stressed the importance of America retaining its position as the world’s greatest nation. His plans to ensure that status implies expanding the role of government. That possibility aggravated and further alarmed those concerned about growing the catastrophic $13 trillion U.S. debt.

Meanwhile, a sudden civilian revolt in Tunisia, which has now spread to Egypt and threatens other entrenched oligarchies in the Middle East, surprised the world, and apparently the State Department. The hopeful expectation is that these revolts will usher democracy into nations that have long endured harsh totalitarian governments — many of which have been steadfastly supported by the United States.

Our pragmatic foreign policy never allows our principles to subvert our self-interests. While we are the world’s ostensible standard bearer of democracy, we will, nevertheless, fund even the harshest of tyrants when it is advantageous to some skullduggery of our government. Sometimes that policy backfires as it did in Iran in 1979 when the U.S.-backed tyrant there was overthrown by angry Iranians and replaced by new tyrants who hate the United States, but who love nuclear weapons. Sometimes it is just difficult to know which tyrant to back?

Should the revolutions in Tunisia and Egypt result in democratic forms of government there, it will have happened without deploying 150,000 U.S. troops and spending more than $600 billion in a nearly decade long dubious effort to install democracy. It will have happened in spite of our longstanding support of the tyrants there. But, who knew democracy could happen without U.S. help or hindrance?

Currently, the United States spends more than $685 billion a year on defense. Much of that is to maintain a military presence in nearly 1,000 locations around the globe. More than 300,000 U.S. troops are deployed in more than 150 countries; 80 percent of the world’s nations have some degree of U.S. occupation.

Already $13 trillion in debt and growing worse every minute, can we really afford to maintain pan-global military muscle that is of dubious effectiveness in supporting despots or preventing popular revolutions? Is it really necessary? What or who is the perceived enemy that requires such massive deployment of military might? Is all this muscle about protecting fossil fuel supplies in the Mideast, or crushing the drug trade in Latin America, or blustering about the high seas and air corridors to impress or intimidate friends and foes?

What ever it is, it is going to significantly contribute to our bankruptcy or turn us into blatant imperial predators robbing the wealth of other nations while refusing to pay our debts, and daring anyone to stop us. Either possibility is disastrous. The latter would be dastardly.

Our economy, near shambles these past three years, is teetering toward disaster under the gigantic burden of federal debt. By maintaining our massive military presence around the world we have taken on a huge mortgage to buy an empire we cannot afford. Some of the greatest empires in human history have faltered financially just before suffering collapse or conquest.

If Obama really wants to maintain America’s peerless position in the world, he should focus on finance not empire. The wars in Iraq and Afghanistan have drained our treasury of $1 trillion so far. Obama should honor his campaign promises to quickly withdraw our military from Iraq and Afghanistan and end those treasury-draining, misbegotten military misadventures.

We should downsize our defense budget to just defend the nation, not maintain the trappings of empire. Why do we still need a huge military presence in Europe? What are we doing with military outposts in Latin America? Chasing coca-growing leftists? What for? Bring our troops home and put them along our southern border. That would be true national defense.

— Santa Barbara political observer Randy Alcorn can be contacted at .(JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address).

Support Noozhawk Today!

Our professional journalists work tirelessly to report on local news so you can be more informed and engaged in your community. This quality, local reporting is free for you to read and share, but it's not free to produce.

You count on us to deliver timely, relevant local news, 24/7. Can we count on you to invest in our newsroom and help secure its future?

We provide special member benefits to show how much we appreciate your support.

Email
I would like give...
Great! You're joining as a Red-Tailed Hawk!
  • Ask
  • Vote
  • Investigate
  • Answer

Noozhawk Asks: What’s Your Question?

Welcome to Noozhawk Asks, a new feature in which you ask the questions, you help decide what Noozhawk investigates, and you work with us to find the answers.

Here’s how it works: You share your questions with us in the nearby box. In some cases, we may work with you to find the answers. In others, we may ask you to vote on your top choices to help us narrow the scope. And we’ll be regularly asking you for your feedback on a specific issue or topic.

We also expect to work together with the reader who asked the winning questions to find the answer together. Noozhawk’s objective is to come at questions from a place of curiosity and openness, and we believe a transparent collaboration is the key to achieve it.

The results of our investigation will be published here in this Noozhawk Asks section. Once or twice a month, we plan to do a review of what was asked and answered.

Thanks for asking!

Click Here to Get Started >

Reader Comments

Noozhawk is no longer accepting reader comments on our articles. Click here for the announcement. Readers are instead invited to submit letters to the editor by emailing them to [email protected]. Please provide your full name and community, as well as contact information for verification purposes only.