Pixel Tracker

Thursday, December 13 , 2018, 1:24 pm | Fair 66º


Mona Charen: America and Autocrats Through the Years

It must still be our goal to prevent a worse regime from emerging from the chaos in Egypt

As Egypt staggers toward an uncertain future, a familiar complaint is making the opinion rounds in the United States — namely, that Egypt’s current predicament is at least in part traceable to the supposed American fondness for propping up corrupt dictators around the globe.

From the left, Salon magazine offered that “this is a good moment to take a look at where else in the world American taxpayer dollars are helping to prop up dictatorships with poor human rights records,” while on the center/right, Robert Kagan demanded, “What are we going to do — support dictators for the rest of eternity because we don’t want Islamists taking their share of some political system in the Middle East?”

The United States has been accused of backing autocrats and therefore engendering the enduring hostility of persecuted populations for more than a half-century. Throughout the Cold War, the standard accusation was that America was responsible for every act of every authoritarian regime on the planet — provided it was outside the Soviet sphere.

There is no doubt that American policymakers have made (and continue to make) their share of mistakes. There is also no question that the United States has allied itself with some despicable characters over the years.

But while this name never seems to pop up on lists of disgraceful U.S. allies compiled by the left, the first one that ought to be mentioned — because his was arguably the worst regime we ever “backed” — is Joseph Stalin.

During World War II, the United States was in a formal alliance with Uncle Joe, and provided his murderous regime with support and war materiel worth millions of dollars. In light of the stakes at the time — a world dominated by Nazi Germany — it seemed to be an acceptable accommodation. According to the logic we’re hearing now, this ought to have embittered the Soviet people toward the United States in perpetuity.

But life is complicated — and the former Soviet subjects don’t seem even to view Stalin himself (responsible for roughly 20 million deaths) all that harshly.

Yes, the United States maintained relationships, some quite friendly, with dictators around the globe. But America is not God. It didn’t separate light from darkness and create the world. It has, with infrequent exceptions, had to deal with the world as it is. In 1945, when U.S. world leadership began, there were only about 30 countries in the world that could fairly be described as free. By 1973, according to Freedom House, of 151 nations in the world, only 44 were free. Today, among 194 countries, 87 are considered to be free. Freedom is expanding, and for that we rejoice. But progress is slow and painstaking.

The United States did push and prod a number of authoritarian allies toward democracy and freedom. In Indonesia, South Korea, the Philippines, Chile, El Salvador, Taiwan and elsewhere, American pressure helped ease dictators out the door and usher in more pluralistic governments.

If we sometimes allied with dictators like Anastasio Somoza and the Shah of Iran, we were also in the vanguard of nations seeking to free many millions more from far worse regimes.

But the business of reforming allies is tricky. Former President Jimmy Carter made “human rights” his foreign policy mantra, but he applied it very selectively. And arguably by leaning on the Shah, he paved the way for some of the world’s worst human-rights abusers to take power in Iran. Former President George W. Bush spoke movingly of his “freedom agenda” for the Middle East and warned that so long as “the Middle East remains a place where freedom does not flourish, it will remain a place of stagnation, resentment and violence ready for export.” That may be true. But given the nature of the region, it’s no simple matter to get from A to B, as Bush discovered.

Soon after delivering those words, the United States sent a loud signal of anger to Hosni Mubarak for imprisoning a human-rights activist. The secretary of state canceled a planned trip. But a year later, Secretary Condoleezza Rice was back in Cairo, though Ayman Nour remained in prison. And she was followed to Egypt by Barack Obama.

Mubarak is a foul dictator who has tortured dissenters, stoked vicious anti-Semitism (despite the peace treaty with Israel) and prevented the emergence of peaceful alternative parties. But as in other cases of dealing with dictators, U.S. motives were hardly reprehensible. We supported the regime that was key to maintaining peace with our ally Israel, that cooperated in the war against Islamic terror, and above all, that was preferable to the likeliest alternative. It must still be our aim, more than any other, to try to prevent an even worse regime from emerging from the current chaos.

We didn’t create the world. We don’t prefer to back autocrats. But it’s rough out there, and unrealistic hopes have led to disaster before.

Mona Charen writes for Creators Syndicate. Click here for more information or to contact her.

Support Noozhawk Today

You are an important ally in our mission to deliver clear, objective, high-quality professional news reporting for Santa Barbara, Goleta and the rest of Santa Barbara County. Join the Hawks Club today to help keep Noozhawk soaring.

We offer four membership levels: $5 a month, $10 a month, $25 a month or $1 a week. Payments can be made using a credit card, Apple Pay or Google Pay, or click here for information on recurring credit-card payments and a mailing address for checks.

Thank you for your vital support.

Become a Noozhawk Supporter

First name
Last name
Select your monthly membership
Or choose an annual membership

Payment Information

Membership Subscription

You are enrolling in . Thank you for joining the Hawks Club.

Payment Method

Pay by Credit Card:

Mastercard, Visa, American Express, Discover
One click only, please!

Pay with Apple Pay or Google Pay:

Noozhawk partners with Stripe to provide secure invoicing and payments processing.
You may cancel your membership at any time by sending an email to .(JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address).

  • Ask
  • Vote
  • Investigate
  • Answer

Noozhawk Asks: What’s Your Question?

Welcome to Noozhawk Asks, a new feature in which you ask the questions, you help decide what Noozhawk investigates, and you work with us to find the answers.

Here’s how it works: You share your questions with us in the nearby box. In some cases, we may work with you to find the answers. In others, we may ask you to vote on your top choices to help us narrow the scope. And we’ll be regularly asking you for your feedback on a specific issue or topic.

We also expect to work together with the reader who asked the winning questions to find the answer together. Noozhawk’s objective is to come at questions from a place of curiosity and openness, and we believe a transparent collaboration is the key to achieve it.

The results of our investigation will be published here in this Noozhawk Asks section. Once or twice a month, we plan to do a review of what was asked and answered.

Thanks for asking!

Click Here to Get Started >

Reader Comments

Noozhawk is no longer accepting reader comments on our articles. Click here for the announcement. Readers are instead invited to submit letters to the editor by emailing them to [email protected]. Please provide your full name and community, as well as contact information for verification purposes only.