Monday, July 23 , 2018, 2:59 am | Fair 68º

 
 
 
 

Mona Charen: Cause for Celebration in Egypt, But Hold the Champagne

To achieve true freedom and democracy, the military will have to cede power

Conservatives have been chastised in some quarters during the past week for their lack of enthusiasm for the “revolution” in Egypt. “Fear and loathing — of Muslims especially — rules the Right,” declared John Guardiano on the FrumForum. “Within some conservative precincts,” Commentary’s Peter Wehner chided, “there has been reluctance even to share in the aspirations of the Egyptian people.” Paul Wolfowitz has been utterly unambivalent: “I think it’s a terrific vindication for the Egyptian people ... And the people who said for years that somehow Arabs didn’t care about freedom are just dead wrong.”

On behalf of skeptical conservatives everywhere, here are two cheers for the Egyptian revolution. 1) The protesters in Tahrir Square and elsewhere might so easily have resorted to violence when their demands that Hosni Mubarak leave went unmet. They might have marched on the presidential palace and initiated a blood bath. They refrained. Through days upon days of demonstrations, running short on essentials and withstanding the rain and wind, they kept their vigil almost entirely peaceful. 2) Since Mubarak’s ouster, there have been few calls for revenge or witch hunts.

There is a good deal to admire about the way Egyptians have behaved during this tumultuous time. But there are also good and sufficient reasons to keep our enthusiasm corked for now.

Egypt has exchanged a dictator propped up by the military for a straight military dictatorship. Yes, that is about the best short-term outcome that could have been achieved given the nature of Egyptian society (no working political parties, no genuine parliament, a controlled press, weak protection of property rights, lack of an independent judiciary). Power could not very well have been handed over to the protesters in Tahrir Square. Someone has to keep order.

But if the protesters in Egypt desire real freedom and democracy, as Wolfowitz and others are sure they do, the military will have to cede power. It is far from clear that they will be willing to do so.

ProPublica reports that “estimates vary as to how much of the Egyptian economy is run by the military — ranging from 5 percent to 40 percent ... military-owned companies, often run by retired generals, are particularly active in the water, olive oil, cement, construction, hotel and gasoline industries. ... The commercial revenue has proved lucrative, and helped top military officers maintain a kind of lifestyle that includes ‘an extensive network of luxurious social clubs as well as comfortable retirements — all of which helps ensure officer loyalty.’”

Bloomberg News reports that “upon retirement, senior officers are given hefty retirement packages and appointed as provincial governors or heads of municipalities.” A State Department cable described the military as hostile to economic reforms, explaining that the generals view privatization efforts “as a threat to (their) economic position.”

We know what we want for the Egyptian people — political freedom, respect for individual rights, economic liberty, religious freedom and peace. But there is a great deal of doubt that Egyptians know that this is what we want for them — did we not support Mubarak for 30 years? Also, there is considerable uncertainty that this is what they want for themselves — or that the protests that ousted Mubarak will bring them closer to achieving their goals.

It’s hard to know with anything approaching certainty what the American people want, so caution is advisable when interpreting another society. We don’t know whether polling is accurate there, and in any case, polling is an inexact science. With those caveats registered, some of the following findings should give pause to those who are prematurely proclaiming that Egypt’s revolution represents, as President Barack Obama put it, “a bend” in “the arc of history toward justice.”

A 2009 World Public Opinion poll found that 64 percent of Egyptians have favorable views of the Muslim Brotherhood, and 75 percent agree with the Muslim Brotherhood’s idea that a body of religious scholars should have veto power over laws it believes contravene the Quran. Only 36 percent said a non-Muslim should be able to run for president.

A 2011 Pew Research Center survey found that only 31 percent of Egyptians perceived a struggle between fundamentalists and modernizers in their country. Among that 31 percent, 59 percent identified with the fundamentalists and 27 percent with the modernizers. On the other hand, 30 percent were “very concerned” and 40 percent “somewhat concerned” about Islamic extremism in their country. Among seven majority Muslim countries, Egypt was second to the bottom in the number of respondents who said “democracy is preferable to any other form of government” with 59 percent agreeing.

Finally, the nation best equipped to help Egypt navigate toward free institutions — the United States — is viewed most unfavorably by average Egyptians because of our relationship with Mubarak.

The arc hasn’t bent yet, and it may not bend toward justice at all.

Mona Charen writes for Creators Syndicate. Click here for more information or to contact her.

Support Noozhawk Today

You are an important ally in our mission to deliver clear, objective, high-quality professional news reporting for Santa Barbara, Goleta and the rest of Santa Barbara County. Join the Hawks Club today to help keep Noozhawk soaring.

We offer four membership levels: $5 a month, $10 a month, $25 a month or $1 a week. Payments can be made through Stripe below, or click here for information on recurring credit-card payments and a mailing address for checks.

Thank you for your vital support.

Become a Noozhawk Supporter

First name
Last name
Enter your email
Select your membership level
×

Payment Information

You are purchasing:

Payment Method

Pay by Credit Card:

Mastercard, Visa, American Express, Discover
One click only, please!

Pay with Apple Pay or Google Pay:

Noozhawk partners with Stripe to provide secure invoicing and payments processing.

  • Ask
  • Vote
  • Investigate
  • Answer

Noozhawk Asks: What’s Your Question?

Welcome to Noozhawk Asks, a new feature in which you ask the questions, you help decide what Noozhawk investigates, and you work with us to find the answers.

Here’s how it works: You share your questions with us in the nearby box. In some cases, we may work with you to find the answers. In others, we may ask you to vote on your top choices to help us narrow the scope. And we’ll be regularly asking you for your feedback on a specific issue or topic.

We also expect to work together with the reader who asked the winning questions to find the answer together. Noozhawk’s objective is to come at questions from a place of curiosity and openness, and we believe a transparent collaboration is the key to achieve it.

The results of our investigation will be published here in this Noozhawk Asks section. Once or twice a month, we plan to do a review of what was asked and answered.

Thanks for asking!

Click Here to Get Started >

Reader Comments

Noozhawk is no longer accepting reader comments on our articles. Click here for the announcement. Readers are instead invited to submit letters to the editor by emailing them to [email protected]. Please provide your full name and community, as well as contact information for verification purposes only.

Daily Noozhawk

Subscribe to Noozhawk's A.M. Report, our free e-Bulletin sent out every day at 4:15 a.m. with Noozhawk's top stories, hand-picked by the editors.

Sign Up Now >