Saturday, March 24 , 2018, 5:24 am | Fair 48º


Diane Dimond: Allowing College Students, Professors to Pack Heat

Recent shooting rampages incite debate over concealed weapons on campus

When your children go to college, what do you pack to send with them? You probably include their clothing, some sheets and towels, a laptop computer and maybe a small refrigerator or microwave. But how about a gun?

Don’t be shocked. It’s not that far-fetched. And guns could be coming to a college campus near you.

In the aftermath of several campus shootings in recent years and the gun-fueled violence in Arizona that killed six, wounded 13 and incapacitated Rep. Gabrielle Giffords, D-Ariz., there is a movement to give college students and their professors the right to carry weapons onto campus.

It is already the law in Utah, where students at all public colleges are allowed to carry a concealed gun if they have the proper permit. And in Colorado, several colleges have taken advantage of a state law giving them the option of allowing licensed handguns in class. Several other institutions of higher learning there are also considering it. Similar measures have been proposed in about a dozen other states. There is almost always opposition to the idea.

But in Texas, which has more than a half-million college students at any given time, legislators seem ready to pass their version of a guns-on-campus bill that sponsors say will help keep the peace in places where students are trying to learn. They believe the best defense against another out-of-control campus gunman killing innocents is armed students and professors who can shoot back and stop the carnage.

Naturally, that’s a point of white-hot debate.

On one side are those who think guns are the last thing you want to introduce into a college setting rife with academic pressures, romantic entanglements, competitive sports and the universal experimentation with alcohol and drugs. A Los Angeles Times editorial opined recently, “Adding firearms to this volatile mix is a spectacularly bad idea; guns are indeed tools of self-defense, but they’re also tools of suicide, accidental shootings, intimidation and murder.”

The Brady Campaign to Prevent Gun Violence, named for former presidential press secretary Jim Brady, who nearly lost his life in 1981 when an assassin opened fire on his boss, President Ronald Reagan, is firmly against the idea of weapons on campus.

A rep for the organization says: “The college-age years — 18 to 24 — are the peak years for engaging in gun crimes, abusing drugs and alcohol, attempting suicide and having other mental health problems. A binge-drinking, drug-using student is dangerous enough; let’s not give him or her a gun.”

Here’s the other side. The legislator who proposed the pending bill in Texas is state Sen. Jeff Wentworth, R-San Antonio. He recently told MSNBC host Chris Matthews that Matthews was wrong in his assumptions about the bill.

“It’s not college kids carrying concealed weapons on campus. In Texas, the law requires you to be at least 21 years of age to get a license,” Wentworth said. The concealed weapons law will be “mainly for members of the facility, staff, graduate students and a few seniors” to protect the rest of the “unarmed, defenseless and vulnerable” students should someone come on campus and start shooting.

Wentworth was questioned repeatedly about mixing guns with students using alcohol. What about an armed student carrying a gun into a campus bar? Impossible, he said. “We don’t have bars on (public university) campuses. That’s the law in Texas.”

What would happen if a student decided to take a weapon to a hotly contested football or other type of athletic contest? “That’s not allowed under this bill,” Wentworth said.

Remembering the 2007 slaughter in Virginia where 32 students were killed, Wentworth calmly said, “I don’t ever want to see repeated on a Texas college campus what happened at Virginia Tech, where some deranged, suicidal madman goes into a building and is able to pick off totally defenseless kids like sitting ducks.”

Truth be told, I’d like to see all guns — from small handguns and Glocks to rifles and semi-automatic types — melted down and used for scrap. Tra-la-lah! Wouldn’t it be a wonderful world that found no need for guns at all? My logical brain tells me that is never going to happen, though.

So, the question becomes, do we run the risk of regulating gun ownership so much that the responsible people among us decide it isn’t worth the hassle of multiple classes, training sessions and big fees to get a license? When that happens, only police and the bad guys will have guns. And as we all know, the police can’t be everywhere.

Dependable Americans with permits already carry their weapons into shopping malls, banks, churches and grocery stores, among countless other places every day. Why should a university campus be any different?

Final facts to ponder: A group called Students for Concealed Carry on Campus reports that more than 70 U.S. campuses allow licensed guns. There hasn’t been a single reported instance of shootouts, accidents or heated confrontations with a gun involved at any of them. In fact, statistics show the crime rate at Colorado State University has gone steadily down since concealed carry was enacted.

Diane Dimond is the author of Cirque Du Salahi: Be Careful Who You Trust. Click here for more information. She can be contacted at .(JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address).

  • Ask
  • Vote
  • Investigate
  • Answer

Noozhawk Asks: What’s Your Question?

Welcome to Noozhawk Asks, a new feature in which you ask the questions, you help decide what Noozhawk investigates, and you work with us to find the answers.

Here’s how it works: You share your questions with us in the nearby box. In some cases, we may work with you to find the answers. In others, we may ask you to vote on your top choices to help us narrow the scope. And we’ll be regularly asking you for your feedback on a specific issue or topic.

We also expect to work together with the reader who asked the winning questions to find the answer together. Noozhawk’s objective is to come at questions from a place of curiosity and openness, and we believe a transparent collaboration is the key to achieve it.

The results of our investigation will be published here in this Noozhawk Asks section. Once or twice a month, we plan to do a review of what was asked and answered.

Thanks for asking!

Click here to get started >

Support Noozhawk Today

You are an important ally in our mission to deliver clear, objective, high-quality professional news reporting for Santa Barbara, Goleta and the rest of Santa Barbara County. Join the Hawks Club today to help keep Noozhawk soaring.

We offer four membership levels: $5 a month, $10 a month, $25 a month or $1 a week. Payments can be made through PayPal below, or click here for information on recurring credit-card payments.

Thank you for your vital support.

Reader Comments

Noozhawk is no longer accepting reader comments on our articles. Click here for the announcement. Readers are instead invited to submit letters to the editor by emailing them to [email protected]. Please provide your full name and community, as well as contact information for verification purposes only.

Daily Noozhawk

Subscribe to Noozhawk's A.M. Report, our free e-Bulletin sent out every day at 4:15 a.m. with Noozhawk's top stories, hand-picked by the editors.

Sign Up Now >