Wednesday, June 20 , 2018, 6:38 am | Fog/Mist 56º


Jim Hightower:  Republicans Turn Opposition Into Obstinancy

What started out as "no" has ballooned into political dogma.

“No” can be a very good word. Whether dealing with children or Congress, a firm “uh-uh” can set useful borders for acceptable behavior.

And, for such a short word, “no” can also carry a world of principle — America would be a lot better off today, for example, if only a few indignant “do nots” had been uttered in the executive suites of the Merrill Lynchers, Citgroupers and other banksters.

Jim Hightower
Jim Hightower
Where “no” turns bad, however, is when it becomes the only word in one’s vocabulary, spat out again and again as more of an expression of petulance than principle. Anyone who’s been around a pouty 2-year-old knows how grating the repetitive “no” can be.

Yet, this is what America is getting these days from most of the Republican Party’s top elected officials. Let’s hope they’re just going through a phase.

The party’s leaders first elevated snappish negativity to a level of political dogma when President Obama produced his $900 billion economic recovery bill. Yes, that is a serious chunk of change, even by Washington standards, and any proposal so big should be combed through piece by piece to find principled objections. But, instead, the GOP instantly jerked its right knee, locked its mind shut and just said no, rejecting the whole package out of hand.

“We don’t think it’s going to work,” sniffed House Minority Leader John Boehner, R-Ohio, who made sure that not even one Republican voted to give the plan a chance. It is “larded with wasteful spending,” screeched Louisiana Gov. Bobby Jindal, doing his best Chicken Little imitation. And party warhorse John McCain trudged out to bray that Obama was engaging in “generational theft” by increasing the federal debt.

Wow, such gloom and doom. The bill certainly does carry a big tab, but America has big problems right now, and it’s going to take some big ideas and risks to fix our problems. Instead of offering ideas and hope, however, Republican leaders threw up a “wall of no,” asserting that they would protect future generations against deficit spending.

Jindal, for example, struck this pose in his response to Obama’s recent address to Congress: “Who among us,” he implored, “would ask our children for a loan so we could spend money we do not have on things we do not need?”

Well, actually, guv, your own party would. And did. Again and again. Start with the $3 trillion cost of George W.‘s misadventure in Iraq that the White House and Congress merrily slapped on our children’s credit cards. Or, remember just months back when Bush’s treasury secretary and federal reserve chief madly borrowed several trillion dollars from our children to stuff into the pockets of Wall Street hucksters, with no requirements that the banks do anything productive with the money?

These Republican-driven deficits dwarf Obama’s spending, and they are truly profligate. They saddle future generations with enormous costs for, as Jindal put it, “things we don’t need,” without returning any benefits to our country. In contrast, spending in the recovery package will buy roads, schoolhouses, water systems, parks, health care, mass transit, renewable energy and other real products that we really do need — things that will be there for future generations.

Having frothed at the mouth and voted “no,” many Republican congress-critters turned right around to grab credit for bringing piles of that awful deficit spending to their home districts. Only hours after voting against the bill, for example, Rep. John Mica was telling the home folks back in Florida that — hallelujah! — passage of the program meant there’d be federal money for a local commuter train project.

Even Jindal played this ideological shell game. In his national TV denunciation of Obama’s plan, he singled out a “volcano monitoring” project as a gross example of waste, declaring that, “Instead of monitoring volcanoes, what Congress should be monitoring is the eruption of spending in Washington.”

Good line! Except that, as he spoke, Jindal’s office was pushing hard to get $6 billion in recovery funds for Louisiana.

Jim Hightower is a national radio commentator, writer, public speaker and author of Swim Against The Current: Even A Dead Fish Can Go With The Flow. Click here for more information, or click here to contact him.

Support Noozhawk Today

You are an important ally in our mission to deliver clear, objective, high-quality professional news reporting for Santa Barbara, Goleta and the rest of Santa Barbara County. Join the Hawks Club today to help keep Noozhawk soaring.

We offer four membership levels: $5 a month, $10 a month, $25 a month or $1 a week. Payments can be made through PayPal below, or click here for information on recurring credit-card payments.

Thank you for your vital support.

Become a Noozhawk Supporter

First name
Last name
Enter your email
Select your membership level

Payment Information

You are purchasing:

Payment Method

Pay by Credit Card:

Mastercard, Visa, American Express, Discover

Pay with Apple Pay or Google Pay:

Noozhawk partners with Stripe to provide secure invoicing and payments processing.

  • Ask
  • Vote
  • Investigate
  • Answer

Noozhawk Asks: What’s Your Question?

Welcome to Noozhawk Asks, a new feature in which you ask the questions, you help decide what Noozhawk investigates, and you work with us to find the answers.

Here’s how it works: You share your questions with us in the nearby box. In some cases, we may work with you to find the answers. In others, we may ask you to vote on your top choices to help us narrow the scope. And we’ll be regularly asking you for your feedback on a specific issue or topic.

We also expect to work together with the reader who asked the winning questions to find the answer together. Noozhawk’s objective is to come at questions from a place of curiosity and openness, and we believe a transparent collaboration is the key to achieve it.

The results of our investigation will be published here in this Noozhawk Asks section. Once or twice a month, we plan to do a review of what was asked and answered.

Thanks for asking!

Click Here to Get Started >

Reader Comments

Noozhawk is no longer accepting reader comments on our articles. Click here for the announcement. Readers are instead invited to submit letters to the editor by emailing them to [email protected]. Please provide your full name and community, as well as contact information for verification purposes only.

Daily Noozhawk

Subscribe to Noozhawk's A.M. Report, our free e-Bulletin sent out every day at 4:15 a.m. with Noozhawk's top stories, hand-picked by the editors.

Sign Up Now >