Pixel Tracker

Wednesday, December 19 , 2018, 12:15 am | Fair 45º

 
 
 
 

Opposition Builds Over County’s Proposed Construction Agreement

Contractors and others say the agreement, which has yet to be written, would limit the competition for projects and raise costs for taxpayers

In February, a proposal to create a Construction Stabilization Agreement on bidding for Santa Barbara County projects was approved unanimously by the Board of Supervisors, while the local construction community remained mostly unaware. On Wednesday, opponents rallied against the proposal, which they say would cut down on competition for public works project bids and increase the cost to taxpayers.

The agreement itself, initiated by 1st District Supervisor Salud Carbajal, is not yet written, leaving its implications vague. At first glance, its goals appear to be decreasing costs to the county and keeping county projects staffed by local workers.

The supervisors directed staff to work with all interested stakeholders while creating it, before returning to the board for a vote.

The county also is considering implementing the agreement as a pilot for a few upcoming projects to better evaluate it, Carbajal said in an e-mail to Noozhawk.

Although the exact language of the agreement won’t be known until it’s written, Carbajal said that both union and nonunion contractors would be able to bid on projects covered under the CSA.

The representatives of contractors associations who gathered outside the Santa Barbara County Administration Building on Wednesday said the agreement would limit nonunion businesses from bidding on county capital projects.

“It’s a solution in search of a problem,” said Eric Christen, executive director of the nonprofit Coalition for Fair Employment in Construction.

Robin Hayhurst, one of the few people who spoke at Tuesday’s board meeting against the proposal, said about 85 percent of the county’s contractors are nonunion, and any discriminatory agreement wouldn’t add up to fair competition.

She and others who spoke were mostly upset at the county’s process in putting this agreement into being — without seeking any opinion from the nonunion contractor community.

Hayhurst, who is on the board of the Santa Maria Valley Contractors Association, said the proposal isn’t the answer to improving local jobs, as contractors leave the county for work even now.

“Do you think Santa Barbara County can keep Santa Barbara County contractors alive? No,” she said. “We all work the tri-county area anyway.”

Joe Campanelli, William Parris and others spoke about their anger at the process — not unions.

“We want the best bid to win,” Campanelli said.

Nonunion general contractors weren’t the only ones out opposing the agreement; they were joined by members of union firms and the Santa Barbara Region Chamber of Commerce.

“We want to make all businesses strong,” chamber board chairwoman Julie McGovern said.

Contractor associations of Santa Barbara, Santa Maria and Ventura County have vocally opposed the proposal, and many members attended Wednesday’s gathering.

Jack Martin of Action Roofing brought three of his employees. Action Roofing has won bids for many county projects, most recently for the Lompoc water district and school systems throughout the county.

“We’re going to follow this all the way to the end,” one of his employees said.

Once written, the agreement will go back before the Board of Supervisors for a vote.

Noozhawk staff writer Giana Magnoli can be reached at .(JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address).

Support Noozhawk Today

You are an important ally in our mission to deliver clear, objective, high-quality professional news reporting for Santa Barbara, Goleta and the rest of Santa Barbara County. Join the Hawks Club today to help keep Noozhawk soaring.

We offer four membership levels: $5 a month, $10 a month, $25 a month or $1 a week. Payments can be made using a credit card, Apple Pay or Google Pay, or click here for information on recurring credit-card payments and a mailing address for checks.

Thank you for your vital support.

Become a Noozhawk Supporter

First name
Last name
Email
Select your monthly membership
Or choose an annual membership
×

Payment Information

Membership Subscription

You are enrolling in . Thank you for joining the Hawks Club.

Payment Method

Pay by Credit Card:

Mastercard, Visa, American Express, Discover
One click only, please!

Pay with Apple Pay or Google Pay:

Noozhawk partners with Stripe to provide secure invoicing and payments processing.
You may cancel your membership at any time by sending an email to .(JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address).

  • Ask
  • Vote
  • Investigate
  • Answer

Noozhawk Asks: What’s Your Question?

Welcome to Noozhawk Asks, a new feature in which you ask the questions, you help decide what Noozhawk investigates, and you work with us to find the answers.

Here’s how it works: You share your questions with us in the nearby box. In some cases, we may work with you to find the answers. In others, we may ask you to vote on your top choices to help us narrow the scope. And we’ll be regularly asking you for your feedback on a specific issue or topic.

We also expect to work together with the reader who asked the winning questions to find the answer together. Noozhawk’s objective is to come at questions from a place of curiosity and openness, and we believe a transparent collaboration is the key to achieve it.

The results of our investigation will be published here in this Noozhawk Asks section. Once or twice a month, we plan to do a review of what was asked and answered.

Thanks for asking!

Click Here to Get Started >

Reader Comments

Noozhawk is no longer accepting reader comments on our articles. Click here for the announcement. Readers are instead invited to submit letters to the editor by emailing them to [email protected]. Please provide your full name and community, as well as contact information for verification purposes only.