Wednesday, May 23 , 2018, 8:44 am | Overcast 59º


Harris Sherline: We Have Met the Enemy, and It Is Us

At some point, local government will be forced to default on benefits the unions negotiated for their members

One of the most valuable lessons about negotiating that I learned in more than 50 years as an accounting professional and businessman was to always leave something for the other side. Successful negotiating is not about winning everything and leaving nothing for the other party. That’s one of the biggest mistaken assumptions made by many people and can sometimes lead to undesirable and unintended consequences.

Harris Sherline
Harris Sherline

Negotiating is not dictating. It’s a give-and-take process that, hopefully, can be a win-win for both parties. Otherwise, it becomes an exercise in power, where one side simply dictates to the other.

That said, the example of the day is the unions that represent government employees vs. the government entities that employ them and indirectly the taxpayers who ultimately pay the bill. Think about it: What is the long-term outcome likely to be when unions obtain wages and benefits from the government that can’t be sustained over time?

Pogo’s well-known quote comes to mind: “We have met the enemy and he is us.” That seems to be the case with government employee unions, which have negotiated wage and benefit packages that are generally better than those of most taxpayers forced to pay the bill.

The argument is sometimes made that government employees are also taxpayers. True enough. However, that would be appropriate only if they were paying the major share of the bill for their own compensation.

The problem has been a combination of government revenue streams that grew steadily for many years, coupled with compliant politicians who responded to the political muscle of the unions that have actively supported their campaigns for election. A particularly egregious example of this was the Santa Barbara City Council election a few years ago, in which the employees union asked council candidates a series of questions but would not release their responses to the public.

Not only do the government employee unions have the power to strike, they also vote and, given the percentage of the work force that now works for government, they represent a major portion of the voting population.

We — that is, our political leaders — can resist, but they don’t. President Ronald Reagan demonstrated the value of pushing back against the excessive demands of government employees by firing more than 11,000 air traffic controllers in 1981, when they attempted what was then an illegal strike.

The result has been the steady growth of government employee costs, to the point that they can no longer be sustained. This is clearly demonstrated by the current plight of Santa Barbara County, which is grappling with a projected budget deficit of about $39 million

The percentage of government budgets that is allocated to employee retirement has been steadily increasing. At some point, the government entities that fail to stop approving expenditures they don’t have the money to pay will eventually go broke. When that happens, whatever retirement benefits they may be contractually bound to pay to their employees will be drastically reduced, of necessity, possibly by a bankruptcy court, if no other way.

But, both the unions and the various government entities seem to keep trying to “soldier on” as if there’s no tomorrow. One gets the impression that if no one looks, the problem will just go away. It won’t. There will be a day of reckoning, and appears to be approaching fast.

Writing in the Santa Maria Times, Julian Ramos noted on March 3: “Faced with the unenviable task of closing an overall $40 million budget gap, the Santa Barbara County Board of Supervisors agreed Tuesday to hold off giving direction to county staff on how to narrow that deficit. ... Most of the budget gap is linked to skyrocketing county employee retirement costs and shrinking property tax revenues, which makes up the majority of the board’s discretionary funding and supports most public-safety programs.”

Fifth District Supervisor Joe Centeno of Santa Maria said he would rather see cuts to nonessential services than see reductions in services to children and adults who need mental-health care. “We have to find a way to accommodate their needs,” he said.

It all sounds good, but no one has the slightest idea how to stretch the available funds to accomplish that without going broke in the process. Ultimately, Santa Barbara County won’t be able to meet its commitments to pay the retirement benefits the unions have negotiated for their members. The county will be forced to default, and the unions will have turned out to be their own worst enemy.

It’s time people in government — at every level — get real.

— Harris R. Sherline is a retired CPA and former chairman and CEO of Santa Ynez Valley Hospital who has lived in Santa Barbara County for more than 30 years. He stays active writing opinion columns and his blog,

Support Noozhawk Today

You are an important ally in our mission to deliver clear, objective, high-quality professional news reporting for Santa Barbara, Goleta and the rest of Santa Barbara County. Join the Hawks Club today to help keep Noozhawk soaring.

We offer four membership levels: $5 a month, $10 a month, $25 a month or $1 a week. Payments can be made through PayPal below, or click here for information on recurring credit-card payments.

Thank you for your vital support.

Become a Supporter

Enter your email
Select your membership level

Payment Information

You are purchasing:

Payment Method

Pay by Credit Card:

Mastercard, Visa, American Express, Discover

Pay with Apple Pay or Google Pay:

Noozhawk partners with Stripe to provide secure invoicing and payments processing.

  • Ask
  • Vote
  • Investigate
  • Answer

Noozhawk Asks: What’s Your Question?

Welcome to Noozhawk Asks, a new feature in which you ask the questions, you help decide what Noozhawk investigates, and you work with us to find the answers.

Here’s how it works: You share your questions with us in the nearby box. In some cases, we may work with you to find the answers. In others, we may ask you to vote on your top choices to help us narrow the scope. And we’ll be regularly asking you for your feedback on a specific issue or topic.

We also expect to work together with the reader who asked the winning questions to find the answer together. Noozhawk’s objective is to come at questions from a place of curiosity and openness, and we believe a transparent collaboration is the key to achieve it.

The results of our investigation will be published here in this Noozhawk Asks section. Once or twice a month, we plan to do a review of what was asked and answered.

Thanks for asking!

Click Here to Get Started >

Reader Comments

Noozhawk is no longer accepting reader comments on our articles. Click here for the announcement. Readers are instead invited to submit letters to the editor by emailing them to [email protected]. Please provide your full name and community, as well as contact information for verification purposes only.

Daily Noozhawk

Subscribe to Noozhawk's A.M. Report, our free e-Bulletin sent out every day at 4:15 a.m. with Noozhawk's top stories, hand-picked by the editors.

Sign Up Now >