Friday, September 21 , 2018, 6:07 am | Overcast 67º

 
 
 
 

Local News

Santa Barbara Council Votes to Provide Grant for West Downtown Detox Center

The city will direct $865,000 in redevelopment funds to the Housing Authority, but first asks staff to make revisions addressing neighbors' concerns

The Santa Barbara City Council voted Tuesday afternoon to provide the Housing Authority of the City of Santa Barbara with an $865,000 grant to support a proposed West Downtown detox facility, but it instructed staff to revise the legislation to address neighbors’ concerns.

Council members visited the four-bedroom, four-bath single-family home at 1020 Placido Ave. before Tuesday’s meeting. After an hourlong session of public comment, all members except Councilwoman Michael Self approved of the location of the building.

The Housing Authority will purchase and manage the property, acting as the landlord, while the Council on Alcoholism and Drug Abuse will operate the detox facility.

“We felt the Housing Authority’s role would provide better protections for the community by acting as the landlord,” Housing Authority Executive Director Rob Pearson said.

The City Council will give $865,000 in redevelopment funds to the Housing Authority, which researched multiple locations for more than 18 months.

Since 2004, the 12-bed detox center had been at Casa Esperanza, 816 Cacique St., but increasing service demands made it difficult to operate efficiently.

“At detox is where the beginning starts of whole new life,” Dave Hopkins said during public comment. “When I went to Casa Esperanza, I knew I could get drugs, alcohol, anything I wanted, and that wasn’t going to work.”

Clients volunteer for detoxification and must past drug and background tests before admittance, said Wim Verkaik, CADA’s director of administration. CADA will employ six counselors to watch over the clients every hour of the day for 14-day treatment. There will be two counselors during the day, one in the evening and one at night. Verkaik said the Placido Avenue location will better accommodate women with a separate bathroom and will free up space at Casa Esperanza.

Santa Barbara County District Attorney Joyce Dudley voiced her approval of the detox center.

“I support this program because CADA has a record of success,” Dudley said. “The correlation is direct between recovery and public safety. It will not only save law enforcement dollars, but save lives.”

Verkaik said social detoxification is the only cost-effective treatment in comparison to hospitalization or jail.

“It’s not a drop in center and not a halfway house,” he said.

A typical treatment day would begin at 6 a.m. with hygiene and breakfast, cleaning at 8 a.m. followed by group therapy. After lunch, clients would participate in more group therapy and a 90-minute program, then acupuncture. Clients then would have dinner and another group therapy session. Lights out would come about 10:30 p.m.

“I’ve worked with CADA, and it’s a fantastic organization,” said Emmet Hawkes, executive director of the Santa Barbara Community Housing Corp. “Should there be problems, I know I can make a call to Rob and those issues will be taken care of immediately.”

Victoria Mather, a former substance abuser, shared her personal story during public comment; it was followed by applause.

“I lost everything — my house, my children,” Mather said. “During my prior attempts at rehab, I would detox three to five days before entering, and it wouldn’t work. But when my friend referred me to Santa Barbara, at the end of 14 days my counselor and I had a clear plan on how to live successfully.”

Mather said she is in her second year at SBCC and has her children back.

“Having the initial 14 days to detox with professional one-on-one guidance and understanding helped me make the best decision of my life,” she said. “Now I’m a responsible, contributing member of this beautiful community.”

Councilman Frank Hotchkiss asked whether 14 days would be enough to get someone clean.

“Our clients have made the decision to be clean; that cannot be said for those at Casa Esperanza,” Verkaik said.

While many expressed the need for a detoxification center and that it wouldn’t have an adverse effect on the neighborhood, several neighbors disagreed.

“A lot of us can agree these programs are great and services are needed, but the item is the location and growing families that have invested in housing in the downtown core,” one woman said. “The proposed use is incompatible with the neighborhood.”

About 45 neighbors voiced concern during the two meetings CADA held Feb. 22 and March 10.

“I’m a proponent of the program, but the center was better suited in an industrial area,” Jim Cadenhead said Tuesday. “I have a 9-month-old daughter. When people look outside, they are looking into my bedroom window. ... This could be a great program, but I don’t think it will be good for our neighborhood.”

Rebecca Long, too, said she worried about the facility’s proximity to her family.

“These people are not neighborly; they are going to be rotating in and out,” she said. “I want to put in a sandbox and pool for my baby, our bedroom window is 5 feet, 9 inches from the fence; that’s too many people that close to my home and family. There’s no guarantee someone couldn’t hop over the fence. ... I don’t think it’s fair to say that it’s an improvement on the neighborhood.”

Those who spoke during the public comment period raised issues that weren’t being addressed, such as homeless nearby, a lack of street lights, vandalism and not enough policing.

“The neighborhood concern is really a big issue for me, and there are so many things that were supposed to be policed and aren’t being policed,” Self said. “I sympathize with the concerns that it’s just one more rock on their pile. There are other locations, and we should keep looking.”

Hotchkiss disagreed.

“We are combining two groups that don’t go along with each other. People have a neighborhood fear concerning homeless people in vehicles on the street and say this would be a furtherance of that. I don’t believe that’s the case,” he said. “It’s a real problem, but it’s not the issue here. I think you will find (the center) as a very controlled, conscientious neighbor.”

Mayor Helene Schneider said the center not only would be a good neighbor but would improve the overall public safety of the area.

“The issues related to the neighborhood and public safety will be enhanced with staff oversight, making sure not only the people inside (the center) are clean but the area is safe,” she said. “That will relate to good connections with neighbors.

“I think, though, as the permit process moves forward specific areas can be addressed, such as the concerns of smoking and adequate fencing. If there is concern, we need to make sure the concern gets alleviated. Finding another place is the same as saying we won’t have any (center); it’s not really an option.”

The City Council will revisit the amended legislation next Tuesday.

Noozhawk staff writer Alex Kacik can be reached at .(JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address). Follow Noozhawk on Twitter: @noozhawk, @NoozhawkNews and @NoozhawkBiz. Become a fan of Noozhawk on Facebook.

Support Noozhawk Today

You are an important ally in our mission to deliver clear, objective, high-quality professional news reporting for Santa Barbara, Goleta and the rest of Santa Barbara County. Join the Hawks Club today to help keep Noozhawk soaring.

We offer four membership levels: $5 a month, $10 a month, $25 a month or $1 a week. Payments can be made using a credit card, Apple Pay or Google Pay, or click here for information on recurring credit-card payments and a mailing address for checks.

Thank you for your vital support.

Become a Noozhawk Supporter

First name
Last name
Email
Select your monthly membership
Or choose an annual membership
×

Payment Information

Membership Subscription

You are enrolling in . Thank you for joining the Hawks Club.

Payment Method

Pay by Credit Card:

Mastercard, Visa, American Express, Discover
One click only, please!

Pay with Apple Pay or Google Pay:

Noozhawk partners with Stripe to provide secure invoicing and payments processing.
You may cancel your membership at any time by sending an email to .(JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address).

  • Ask
  • Vote
  • Investigate
  • Answer

Noozhawk Asks: What’s Your Question?

Welcome to Noozhawk Asks, a new feature in which you ask the questions, you help decide what Noozhawk investigates, and you work with us to find the answers.

Here’s how it works: You share your questions with us in the nearby box. In some cases, we may work with you to find the answers. In others, we may ask you to vote on your top choices to help us narrow the scope. And we’ll be regularly asking you for your feedback on a specific issue or topic.

We also expect to work together with the reader who asked the winning questions to find the answer together. Noozhawk’s objective is to come at questions from a place of curiosity and openness, and we believe a transparent collaboration is the key to achieve it.

The results of our investigation will be published here in this Noozhawk Asks section. Once or twice a month, we plan to do a review of what was asked and answered.

Thanks for asking!

Click Here to Get Started >

Reader Comments

Noozhawk is no longer accepting reader comments on our articles. Click here for the announcement. Readers are instead invited to submit letters to the editor by emailing them to [email protected]. Please provide your full name and community, as well as contact information for verification purposes only.

Daily Noozhawk

Subscribe to Noozhawk's A.M. Report, our free e-Bulletin sent out every day at 4:15 a.m. with Noozhawk's top stories, hand-picked by the editors.

Sign Up Now >