Pixel Tracker

Saturday, February 23 , 2019, 10:21 pm | Fair 45º

 
 
 
 

Tony Strickland: High Time to Revisit Unnecessary Boards and Commissions

Cash-strapped California has no business paying part-time workers full-time salaries

A recent Field Poll found that a lowly 18 percent of voters approve of the Legislature’s job performance and 72 percent disapprove. This is actually a slight improvement from the woeful 15 percent approval rating legislators attained in September 2008 — the lowest mark the Field Poll ever recorded for any elected official or organization. Even still, a higher percentage of Californians had a favorable view of the job President Richard Nixon was doing at the height of the Watergate scandal than approve of legislators today.

State Sen. Tony Strickland
State Sen. Tony Strickland

Not helping matters is the persistence of rampant patronage in state government, where political friends of legislators are given cushy positions on one of the many boards and commissions overseeing some function of state government. When I say cushy, I mean six-figure salaries on boards that meet once or twice a month. Nice work if you can get it.

If you’re a member of the general public, though, you probably can’t. These coveted positions often provide a so-called “soft landing” to termed-out legislators, or a reward for favored staff members, spouses or other politically connected insiders. Arguably the most notorious example is the California Integrated Waste Management Board, a six-member panel that oversees and tracks most of the state’s waste and implements policies to recycle and divert as much waste as possible from our landfills.

When I served in the Assembly, I authored legislation to suspend the lucrative salaries of board members and commissioners when the state is facing record budget deficits. Unfortunately, my efforts were shut down. Certainly some of these entities perform important functions in support of worthy goals, but there’s no compelling reason — particularly in this economy — to pay anyone a generous full-time salary for part-time work.

That’s why I’ve once again authored legislation to prohibit people on boards and commissions from receiving a salary of more than $100,000 a year for a position that meets twice a month or less. If passed, SB 685 (State Boards and Commissions: Salaries: Suspension) would do just that.

If you put it in the real world perspective, these board members and commissioners make more than two and a half times what teachers do. They make more than firefighters and police officers who show up every day to work. With California’s unemployment rate topping 10 percent in January and with the state facing record budget deficits, we should be looking in areas to save money outside of education, public safety and health care. It’s irresponsible for our government to be handing out massive paychecks to board members and commissioners while teachers are being laid off and government employees are being furloughed.

At a minimum, we should be examining the responsibilities of such board members and commissioners to determine whose compensation should be downsized to a more modest and appropriate level. For instance, members of the state Coastal Commission, the California State University Board of Trustees, the California Transportation Commission and many other important state bodies earn only $100 per diem for attending meetings.

The budget deal just signed makes substantial cuts to education and social services and contains billions of dollars in tax increases. It’s not realistic to tell the public that state spending has already been cut to the bone, necessitating these difficult choices, when these lucrative state jobs remain in place for an elite few.

Realistically, I understand the reluctance to cut off the hand you hope will be feeding you someday, but Sacramento needs to get its priorities in order. California is in a financial crisis. When we’re debating what should be cut out of state government, these political plums are the low-hanging fruit that should get the first whack.

State Sen. Tony Strickland, R-Moorpark, represents Santa Barbara County’s South Coast in the 19th Senate District.

Support Noozhawk Today

You are an important ally in our mission to deliver clear, objective, high-quality professional news reporting for Santa Barbara, Goleta and the rest of Santa Barbara County. Join the Hawks Club today to help keep Noozhawk soaring.

We offer four membership levels: $5 a month, $10 a month, $25 a month or $1 a week. Payments can be made using a credit card, Apple Pay or Google Pay, or click here for information on recurring credit-card payments and a mailing address for checks.

Thank you for your vital support.

Become a Noozhawk Supporter

First name
Last name
Email
Select your monthly membership
Or choose an annual membership
×

Payment Information

Membership Subscription

You are enrolling in . Thank you for joining the Hawks Club.

Payment Method

Pay by Credit Card:

Mastercard, Visa, American Express, Discover
One click only, please!

Pay with Apple Pay or Google Pay:

Noozhawk partners with Stripe to provide secure invoicing and payments processing.
You may cancel your membership at any time by sending an email to .(JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address).

  • Ask
  • Vote
  • Investigate
  • Answer

Noozhawk Asks: What’s Your Question?

Welcome to Noozhawk Asks, a new feature in which you ask the questions, you help decide what Noozhawk investigates, and you work with us to find the answers.

Here’s how it works: You share your questions with us in the nearby box. In some cases, we may work with you to find the answers. In others, we may ask you to vote on your top choices to help us narrow the scope. And we’ll be regularly asking you for your feedback on a specific issue or topic.

We also expect to work together with the reader who asked the winning questions to find the answer together. Noozhawk’s objective is to come at questions from a place of curiosity and openness, and we believe a transparent collaboration is the key to achieve it.

The results of our investigation will be published here in this Noozhawk Asks section. Once or twice a month, we plan to do a review of what was asked and answered.

Thanks for asking!

Click Here to Get Started >

Reader Comments

Noozhawk is no longer accepting reader comments on our articles. Click here for the announcement. Readers are instead invited to submit letters to the editor by emailing them to [email protected]. Please provide your full name and community, as well as contact information for verification purposes only.

Daily Noozhawk

Subscribe to Noozhawk's A.M. Report, our free e-Bulletin sent out every day at 4:15 a.m. with Noozhawk's top stories, hand-picked by the editors.

Sign Up Now >