Tuesday, April 24 , 2018, 6:56 pm | Partly Cloudy 56º


David Harsanyi: So When Can We Call It Terrorism?

For the media, religious affiliation seems to be selectively vital information

What does a guy have to do to be called a terrorist these days?

Reuters — a global wire service that covers the world and is carried by many hundreds of newspapers, Web sites and television stations — reported this week that a bomb planted in a bag exploded near a bus stop in a “Jewish district of Jerusalem,” killing a British woman and injuring at least 30 civilians.

The piece went on to explain: “Police said it was a ‘terrorist attack’ — Israel’s term for a Palestinian strike.” Or, in other words, the precise English definition of the bombing — the idea, the thought, the action and so on.

And Palestinian Prime Minister Salam Fayyad condemned this “terrorist operation in the strongest possible terms,” as well, so it must mean that “terrorism” is the Palestinian term for a Palestinian strike. But not for Reuters.

Normally, anti-Israel bias is nothing to get too excited about. With its phony deference to journalistic neutrality, Reuters has a long history of conflating and euphemizing events in its biased reporting of the Middle East, both in obvious and subtle ways.

Most reputable news organizations, for instance, tend to downplay or completely ignore the religious affiliation of man-caused disaster-makers. It’s unseemly to bring stuff like that up. It only divides us.

So why did Reuters — and other news outlets — identify the bombing as taking place not in an Israeli neighborhood, but in a “Jewish” one? And why is it a “Palestinian” strike and not a Muslim one? Religious affiliation, it seems, is selectively vital information. Jews, you see, are a religious group occupying Jerusalem, and Palestinians are nationalists striving for autonomy in their homeland.

Of course, Reuters is only the worst offender. It is true that The New York Times can’t file a dispatch from Israel without conflating the religiously motivated murders of civilians with the “settlement” problem. As if Hamas is firing rockets at civilians because it is exasperated by the slow progress of the peace process.

The Times also reported that this was the first bombing “inside Jerusalem in four years,” which was untrue. The Associated Press posted its piece on the bombing and packaged it with a picture of an Arab who had died in an earlier, unrelated airstrike — precipitated by rockets launched from autonomous Gaza, ruled by Hamas, a group that, according to Reuters, leads an “uprising for independence.” This must be true; former President Jimmy Carter says so.

In 2001, Reuters claimed its job was “to provide accurate and impartial accounts of events so that individuals, organizations and governments can make their own decisions based on the facts.” It did so in a letter to newspapers apologizing for a previous memo in which it instructed reporters to use the word “terrorist” judiciously because “one man’s terrorist is another man’s freedom fighter.”

Reuters apologized for the thought — not for using a silly platitude — but never changed its policy, because the situation is tit for tat. Hamas administers. Militants fight. Violence is cyclical.

So a few weeks ago, when a mother, father and three children (including a 3-month-old) were stabbed to death by “militants” in a settlement — Reuters’ term for a Jewish neighborhood in the West Bank — the bulk of the story, as always, focused on how the “attack may complicate efforts to restart peace talks, which are frozen in arguments over whether Israel should first stop building in settlements on occupied land.”

If Reuters were faithfully accurate and impartial, it would — well, it would actually cover the murders. Then it would use more exact words — perhaps “disputed” rather than “occupied” — and mention that the process has been frozen since the late 1940s because of unremitting Arab violence.

Then again, if you can’t muster the journalistic backbone to refer to those who slit the throats of 3-month-old babies or detonate explosives at bus stations as “terrorists,” that’s probably too much to ask.

David Harsanyi is a columnist at The Denver Post. Click here for more information, or click here to contact him. Follow him on Twitter: @davidharsanyi.

  • Ask
  • Vote
  • Investigate
  • Answer

Noozhawk Asks: What’s Your Question?

Welcome to Noozhawk Asks, a new feature in which you ask the questions, you help decide what Noozhawk investigates, and you work with us to find the answers.

Here’s how it works: You share your questions with us in the nearby box. In some cases, we may work with you to find the answers. In others, we may ask you to vote on your top choices to help us narrow the scope. And we’ll be regularly asking you for your feedback on a specific issue or topic.

We also expect to work together with the reader who asked the winning questions to find the answer together. Noozhawk’s objective is to come at questions from a place of curiosity and openness, and we believe a transparent collaboration is the key to achieve it.

The results of our investigation will be published here in this Noozhawk Asks section. Once or twice a month, we plan to do a review of what was asked and answered.

Thanks for asking!

Click Here to Get Started >

Support Noozhawk Today

You are an important ally in our mission to deliver clear, objective, high-quality professional news reporting for Santa Barbara, Goleta and the rest of Santa Barbara County. Join the Hawks Club today to help keep Noozhawk soaring.

We offer four membership levels: $5 a month, $10 a month, $25 a month or $1 a week. Payments can be made through PayPal below, or click here for information on recurring credit-card payments.

Thank you for your vital support.

Maestro, Mastercard, Visa, American Express, Discover, Debit

Reader Comments

Noozhawk is no longer accepting reader comments on our articles. Click here for the announcement. Readers are instead invited to submit letters to the editor by emailing them to [email protected]. Please provide your full name and community, as well as contact information for verification purposes only.

Daily Noozhawk

Subscribe to Noozhawk's A.M. Report, our free e-Bulletin sent out every day at 4:15 a.m. with Noozhawk's top stories, hand-picked by the editors.

Sign Up Now >