Thursday, February 22 , 2018, 6:41 am | Fair 34º

 
 
 
 

Leon Kolankiewicz: Conservation Legends Decry Overpopulation

Dave Foreman and David Attenborough warn of the perils of unabated growth

In recent weeks, two conservation giants — American Dave Foreman and Englishman Sir David Attenborough — have denounced the threat human overpopulation poses to untrammeled nature and biodiversity. They have also questioned why so many continue to downplay and dismiss the menace it represents.

Foreman is a denizen and defender of the American Southwest; he co-founded Earth First!, the Wildlands Project, and now runs the Rewilding Institute. The institute promotes scientifically credible, continental-scale conservation throughout North America, and in particular securing a permanent place for the large carnivores such as wolves, bears, jaguars and mountain lions at the apex of food pyramids in North American ecosystems.

The younger brother of director, producer and actor Richard Attenborough, David Attenborough is a celebrated broadcaster and naturalist whose career as a writer and presenter of natural history programs spans more than a half-century He is most widely known for the Life series, which he prepared for the BBC’s Natural History Unit. The Life series is a wide-ranging and riveting review of planet Earth’s extraordinary pageant of life.

Even while making conservation and environmental history as an activist, Foreman has become one of the foremost historians and thinkers of the contemporary American environmental and conservation movements. In the current issue of his column “Around the Campfire with Uncle Dave Foreman,” he weighs in on the “never-ending squabble” over whether it is population or affluence (high per-capita consumption, or “wastefulness and high life,” as Foreman dubs it) that more heavily impact wild things.

“Those environmentalists, who think we can double or triple U.S. population without wiping out wildlife and scalping our last wildernesses, are living in a fool’s paradise — not in the real world where we either will or will not keep the other earthlings hale and hearty in our shared neighborhoods,” Foreman declares.

Foreman’s sentiments echo those of the late Sen. Gaylord Nelson, founder of Earth Day. In a 2000 speech, Nelson warned of the perils of unabated U.S. population growth. “With twice the population, will there be any wilderness left? Any quiet place? Any habitat for song birds? Waterfalls? Other wild creatures? Not much,” he lamented.

Foreman cites recent research showing that for those couples concerned not only about their own “carbon footprint” but their cumulative, multigenerational “carbon legacy,” foregoing additional offspring achieves far more than any amount of conservation frugality, such as commuting on a bicycle instead of in a car, living in a smaller house, or lowering the thermostat.

He concludes that “without lowering population, cutting back on the high life can’t do the job.”

Speaking to the Royal Society of Arts in London on March 11, Attenborough said, “I meet no one who privately disagrees that population growth is a problem. No one — except flat-Earthers — can deny that the planet is finite. We can all see it in that beautiful picture of our Earth taken from the Apollo mission. So why does hardly anyone say so publicly? There seems to be some bizarre taboo around the subject. ‘It’s not quite nice, not PC, possibly even racist to mention it.’”

Even as Attenborough applauded the notable efforts and successes of the World Wildlife Fund (now known as the Worldwide Fund for Nature, or WWF) on its 50th birthday, he cautioned that serious problems remain, in no small part because the Earth’s population has more than doubled from 3 billion to 7 billion in the same 50 years.

“Over twice as many (humans) — and every one of them needing space,” he said. “Space for their homes, space to grow their food (or to get others to grow it for them), space to build schools and roads and airfields … most of it could only come from the land which, for millions of years, animals and plants had to themselves.”

Attenborough quoted the visionary American economist Kenneth Boulding, who once remarked, “Anyone who believes in indefinite growth in anything physical, on a physically finite planet is either mad — or an economist.” And he asked everyone, especially members of environmental groups and churches, the Catholic Church especially, to “break the taboo — whenever we speak of the environment, add a few words to ensure that the population element is not ignored.”

In speaking out about overpopulation, Foreman and Attenborough join a distinguished list of conservation and science legends and leaders who were not only deeply concerned about the damage inflicted by excessive human numbers on our fellow “Earthlings,” but felt strongly enough to speak out publicly about it. This list includes oceanographer and filmmaker Jacques Cousteau, primatologist Jane Goodall, the aforementioned Nelson, legendary environmentalist David Brower, Greenpeace co-founder and Whale Wars celebrity Paul Watson, among others.

For these icons, the slogan “pro-life” really means pro-life — respecting all living things — and not just pro-human life, and the rest of creation be damned. Let us strive for the day when the ethics of all Americans and citizens of the world have caught up to the expansive ethics of these heroes.

— Leon Kolankiewicz is a senior writing fellow for Californians for Population Stabilization.

  • Ask
  • Vote
  • Investigate
  • Answer

Noozhawk Asks: What’s Your Question?

Welcome to Noozhawk Asks, a new feature in which you ask the questions, you help decide what Noozhawk investigates, and you work with us to find the answers.

Here’s how it works: You share your questions with us in the nearby box. In some cases, we may work with you to find the answers. In others, we may ask you to vote on your top choices to help us narrow the scope. And we’ll be regularly asking you for your feedback on a specific issue or topic.

We also expect to work together with the reader who asked the winning questions to find the answer together. Noozhawk’s objective is to come at questions from a place of curiosity and openness, and we believe a transparent collaboration is the key to achieve it.

The results of our investigation will be published here in this Noozhawk Asks section. Once or twice a month, we plan to do a review of what was asked and answered.

Thanks for asking!

Click here to get started >

Support Noozhawk Today

You are an important ally in our mission to deliver clear, objective, high-quality professional news reporting for Santa Barbara, Goleta and the rest of Santa Barbara County. Join the Hawks Club today to help keep Noozhawk soaring.

We offer four membership levels: $5 a month, $10 a month, $25 a month or $1 a week. Payments can be made through PayPal below, or click here for information on recurring credit-card payments.

Thank you for your vital support.



Reader Comments

Noozhawk is no longer accepting reader comments on our articles. Click here for the announcement. Readers are instead invited to submit letters to the editor by emailing them to [email protected]. Please provide your full name and community, as well as contact information for verification purposes only.

Daily Noozhawk

Subscribe to Noozhawk's A.M. Report, our free e-Bulletin sent out every day at 4:15 a.m. with Noozhawk's top stories, hand-picked by the editors.

Sign Up Now >