Sunday, June 24 , 2018, 12:23 am | Overcast 64º


Local News

County Granted Continuance to Consider Proposed Code Changes

The Board of Supervisors says it needs more time to review the California Coastal Commission's 36 recommendations to local land use policy

Sentiment among the Santa Barbara County Board of Supervisors on Tuesday seemed to reflect the ruffled feathers of its staff as it reviewed amendments recommended by the California Coastal Commission to the county’s Coastal Development Code for Montecito and unincorporated areas of the county.

Although the Coastal Commission staff had been reviewing the county’s amendments to its coastal code since 2007 as part of a certification process required by the California Coastal Act, county staff had only a few days to process the information before handing it off to supervisors for approval.

“I haven’t had a chance to digest this information,” First District Supervisor Salud Carbajal said Tuesday, summing up comments by the other board members. “They have directed us to consider de facto new [coastal] policy that they want us to implement.”

Carbajal was referring to the commission’s 36 proposed changes to the county’s revised coastal land use code — known as the Zoning Ordinance Reformatting Project, or ZORP.

The document, already 1,000 pages, includes an additional 400 pages of revisions from the commission, which county planners said they had not anticipated. The supervisors urge the staff to direct the Coastal Commission to put the item on their meeting agenda later this year. It had been scheduled for the commission’s April 15 meeting in Ventura.

“A lot of what we did was just a reorganization of what we already had. I think [the Coastal Commission] took this opportunity to fix things in the code that they’ve been wanting to fix,” said Noel Langle, a project manager with the county’s Planning and Development Department, suggesting that the Coastal Commission’s staff had made what the county wanted to be a simplification of its coastal land use code into something much more complex.

Only a few members of the public spoke Tuesday, but everyone from Brian Trautwein, an analyst with the Environmental Defense Center, to Christopher Price, an attorney with Price, Postel & Parma, a law firm specializing in land use issues, agreed that more time is needed to review the commission’s changes before the board makes a decision on how to proceed.

There was underlying discontent in the board room Tuesday, with some people floating accusations that the Coastal Commission had overstepped its bounds in making drastic policy changes to a local coastal plan.

Andy Caldwell, executive director of the Coalition of Labor, Agriculture & Business — a taxpayer advocate — accused the Coastal Commission of hijacking local coastal planning.

Trautwein maintained that while the changes the commission made would expand public input into coastal development, the county needs more time.

The board voted unanimously to request a continuance from the commission. Second District Supervisor Janet Wolf confirmed Tuesday afternoon that commission staff had been contacted, and the item was removed from its April 15 agenda.

Wolf said the changes most likely will be heard at the August commission hearing.

Noozhawk staff writer Ben Preston can be reached at .(JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address).

Support Noozhawk Today

You are an important ally in our mission to deliver clear, objective, high-quality professional news reporting for Santa Barbara, Goleta and the rest of Santa Barbara County. Join the Hawks Club today to help keep Noozhawk soaring.

We offer four membership levels: $5 a month, $10 a month, $25 a month or $1 a week. Payments can be made through PayPal below, or click here for information on recurring credit-card payments.

Thank you for your vital support.

Become a Noozhawk Supporter

First name
Last name
Enter your email
Select your membership level

Payment Information

You are purchasing:

Payment Method

Pay by Credit Card:

Mastercard, Visa, American Express, Discover

Pay with Apple Pay or Google Pay:

Noozhawk partners with Stripe to provide secure invoicing and payments processing.

  • Ask
  • Vote
  • Investigate
  • Answer

Noozhawk Asks: What’s Your Question?

Welcome to Noozhawk Asks, a new feature in which you ask the questions, you help decide what Noozhawk investigates, and you work with us to find the answers.

Here’s how it works: You share your questions with us in the nearby box. In some cases, we may work with you to find the answers. In others, we may ask you to vote on your top choices to help us narrow the scope. And we’ll be regularly asking you for your feedback on a specific issue or topic.

We also expect to work together with the reader who asked the winning questions to find the answer together. Noozhawk’s objective is to come at questions from a place of curiosity and openness, and we believe a transparent collaboration is the key to achieve it.

The results of our investigation will be published here in this Noozhawk Asks section. Once or twice a month, we plan to do a review of what was asked and answered.

Thanks for asking!

Click Here to Get Started >

Reader Comments

Noozhawk is no longer accepting reader comments on our articles. Click here for the announcement. Readers are instead invited to submit letters to the editor by emailing them to [email protected]. Please provide your full name and community, as well as contact information for verification purposes only.

Daily Noozhawk

Subscribe to Noozhawk's A.M. Report, our free e-Bulletin sent out every day at 4:15 a.m. with Noozhawk's top stories, hand-picked by the editors.

Sign Up Now >