Pixel Tracker

Tuesday, January 22 , 2019, 6:35 pm | Fair 55º


Jackson Introduces Bill to Require Fiscal Transparency for Power Plants

State Sen. Hannah-Beth Jackson, D-Santa Barbara, has introduced a bill that will require a detailed report outlining the costs of operating a nuclear power plant.

Senate Bill 418, the Nuclear Energy Planning and Responsibility Act, would require that when large utility companies seek ratepayer funding to renew their federal license — a process that happens every 20 years — they will have to file a report with the California Public Utilities Commission detailing the costs associated with radioactive waste storage, emergency planning, maintaining aging facilities, unplanned shutdowns due to seismic activity, permits and various federal requirements.

In addition, SB 418 would require that utilities show how nuclear power plants would contribute to affordable, reliable electricity supplies. The bill would require the CPUC to review and analyze the report independently and for the report to be made public.

Sen. Marty Block, D-San Diego, and Assemblywoman Toni Atkins, D-San Diego, are principal co-authors of the bill.

“The public deserves to know the full story and have these questions asked and answered,” Jackson said. “Utilities often tout nuclear energy as an inexpensive source of power. But there have been unforeseen maintenance costs associated with the San Onofre plant and ratepayers have been left with the bill. And as we saw with Fukushima, Chernobyl and Three Mile Island, the costs of nuclear disaster are astronomical and catastrophic. We need some way to judge whether going forward with a nuclear power plant is the best and most cost-effective route to supplying our energy needs.”

“This is strictly a cost transparency measure that does not close these facilities, but rather requires that ratepayers are told all the associated costs of nuclear energy,” said Rochelle Becker, executive director of the Alliance for Nuclear Responsibility, sponsor of the bill. “In the past, cost assessments were doled out over time, creating a false impression that nuclear power seems cheaper than it is. Many today have forgotten the original billions of dollars in cost overruns we’ve been paying for since the construction of these plants. The right questions need to be asked this time around, because we can’t afford these costly mistakes again.”

There is currently only one operating nuclear power plant in California — Diablo Canyon near San Luis Obispo — and its federal license is up for renewal. If it were to become law, SB 418 would apply to Diablo Canyon’s current license renewal process.

The San Onofre plant, located between Los Angeles and San Diego, went offline in January 2012 and was ordered by the Nuclear Regulatory Commission to stay offline while tubing wear issues were investigated, according to the California Energy Commission. The license for the San Onofre Plant is set to expire in 2022. The plant remains down, more than 15 months later.

Jackson represents the 19th Senate district, which includes all of Santa Barbara County and Western Ventura County. Portions of her district are served by Pacific Gas and Electric, which operates Diablo Canyon, and portions of her district are served by Southern California Edison, which operates San Onofre.

SB 418 is expected to be heard in the Senate Energy, Utilities and Communications Committee on April 16.

— Lisa Gardiner is the communications director for state Sen. Hannah-Beth Jackson.


Support Noozhawk Today

You are an important ally in our mission to deliver clear, objective, high-quality professional news reporting for Santa Barbara, Goleta and the rest of Santa Barbara County. Join the Hawks Club today to help keep Noozhawk soaring.

We offer four membership levels: $5 a month, $10 a month, $25 a month or $1 a week. Payments can be made using a credit card, Apple Pay or Google Pay, or click here for information on recurring credit-card payments and a mailing address for checks.

Thank you for your vital support.

Become a Noozhawk Supporter

First name
Last name
Select your monthly membership
Or choose an annual membership

Payment Information

Membership Subscription

You are enrolling in . Thank you for joining the Hawks Club.

Payment Method

Pay by Credit Card:

Mastercard, Visa, American Express, Discover
One click only, please!

Pay with Apple Pay or Google Pay:

Noozhawk partners with Stripe to provide secure invoicing and payments processing.
You may cancel your membership at any time by sending an email to .(JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address).

  • Ask
  • Vote
  • Investigate
  • Answer

Noozhawk Asks: What’s Your Question?

Welcome to Noozhawk Asks, a new feature in which you ask the questions, you help decide what Noozhawk investigates, and you work with us to find the answers.

Here’s how it works: You share your questions with us in the nearby box. In some cases, we may work with you to find the answers. In others, we may ask you to vote on your top choices to help us narrow the scope. And we’ll be regularly asking you for your feedback on a specific issue or topic.

We also expect to work together with the reader who asked the winning questions to find the answer together. Noozhawk’s objective is to come at questions from a place of curiosity and openness, and we believe a transparent collaboration is the key to achieve it.

The results of our investigation will be published here in this Noozhawk Asks section. Once or twice a month, we plan to do a review of what was asked and answered.

Thanks for asking!

Click Here to Get Started >

Reader Comments

Noozhawk is no longer accepting reader comments on our articles. Click here for the announcement. Readers are instead invited to submit letters to the editor by emailing them to [email protected]. Please provide your full name and community, as well as contact information for verification purposes only.