Pixel Tracker

Friday, December 14 , 2018, 3:12 pm | Fair 65º


Goleta Water District’s $4.5 Million Agreement with Developer Resurfaces After 13 Years

District received the payment in anticipation of a project that never materialized

Revisions to an agreement between the Goleta Water District and a developer on the Gaviota Coast could smooth out a long-standing question of whether the district acted in good faith more than 10 years ago for a project that has not yet materialized.

In 1998, the district accepted a payment of $4.5 million from CPH Dos Pueblos Associates in anticipation of infrastructure that would be necessary in the event it received permission to develop its project, once proposed as a golf course called Dos Pueblos Links on a 208-acre swath of Gaviota Coast land. The district issued a can-and-will serve letter signaling its intention to provide water to the property.

Plans for the golf course were scrapped in 2003 after they were rejected by the California Coastal Commission when endangered red-legged frogs were found on the site. The developer returned with plans for two luxury homes on 130 acres, known locally as the “Makar property,” the necessary annexation of which was challenged by the Gaviota Coast Conservancy.

In 2009, Judge Thomas Anderle sided with the environmental group, but CPH Dos Pueblos won on appeal. Still, the project has not materialized since.

Meanwhile, questions have been raised as to whether the district, now in financial dire straits with no cash reserves, might be liable for the $4.5 million. According to a letter written by the developer, the district did indeed act in good faith.

“CPH Dos Pueblos Associates LLC reaffirms its agreement that the district’s interest in the approximately $4.5 million paid ... is now fully vested in the district and CPH Dos Pueblos Associates will not now or hereafter seek a refund of all or any part of those monies.” the letter reads. However, the developer maintains its ability to make claims against the district if future actions constitute lack of good faith efforts to provide water to a future development.

Also on Tuesday evening, the district board took in the final draft of its Water Supply Management Plan, a document that studies existing water supply, its sources, current demand and projected future demand over the next 20 years.

Consultant Dr. Stephen Bachman said that water supplies in normal conditions (16,500 acre-feet per year) exceed existing demand (14,600 acre-feet per year), and during conditions similar to the 1986-91 drought, supply and demand are about even, though some conservation may be needed. In times of extended drought, even more conservation would be needed.

However, he said it will be necessary to implement more stringent measures as demand increases over the next 20 years.

Dr. Bachman proposed a “hybrid priority” solution, which would include the use of both Cachuma water and groundwater, a measure that would take advantage of Cachuma spill events, “free water” that could go to replenishing the groundwater supply. Other suggestions include continued monitoring, and over the next four years, an evaluation of pumping capacity.

The board approved the report 4-1, with Director Bert Bertrando disagreeing with assumptions made by Bachman about the relative costs of water from the district’s varied sources.

The board unanimously approved Tuesday a contract with Kennedy/Jenks Consultants for a state-required new Urban Water Management Plan. The document would discuss various topics related to current and future water supply, including anticipated build-out and a drought contingency plan.

In addition, the board adopted an ordinance establishing a reserve policy that would establish $6 million in cash reserves for capital, operating and other expenses, a policy that may be amended at least once a year by the board.

It will be awhile, however, before the cash-strapped district will be in compliance with its own policy, GWD President Rosen acknowledged. Facing millions of dollars in essential infrastructure improvements and a depleted cash reserve, the district has been exploring ways to get back in the black, including a new rate system and increased one-time connection fees for new customers or existing customers seeking new connections.

Noozhawk contributing writer Sonia Fernandez can be reached at .(JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address). Follow Noozhawk on Twitter: @noozhawk or @NoozhawkNews.

Support Noozhawk Today

You are an important ally in our mission to deliver clear, objective, high-quality professional news reporting for Santa Barbara, Goleta and the rest of Santa Barbara County. Join the Hawks Club today to help keep Noozhawk soaring.

We offer four membership levels: $5 a month, $10 a month, $25 a month or $1 a week. Payments can be made using a credit card, Apple Pay or Google Pay, or click here for information on recurring credit-card payments and a mailing address for checks.

Thank you for your vital support.

Become a Noozhawk Supporter

First name
Last name
Select your monthly membership
Or choose an annual membership

Payment Information

Membership Subscription

You are enrolling in . Thank you for joining the Hawks Club.

Payment Method

Pay by Credit Card:

Mastercard, Visa, American Express, Discover
One click only, please!

Pay with Apple Pay or Google Pay:

Noozhawk partners with Stripe to provide secure invoicing and payments processing.
You may cancel your membership at any time by sending an email to .(JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address).

  • Ask
  • Vote
  • Investigate
  • Answer

Noozhawk Asks: What’s Your Question?

Welcome to Noozhawk Asks, a new feature in which you ask the questions, you help decide what Noozhawk investigates, and you work with us to find the answers.

Here’s how it works: You share your questions with us in the nearby box. In some cases, we may work with you to find the answers. In others, we may ask you to vote on your top choices to help us narrow the scope. And we’ll be regularly asking you for your feedback on a specific issue or topic.

We also expect to work together with the reader who asked the winning questions to find the answer together. Noozhawk’s objective is to come at questions from a place of curiosity and openness, and we believe a transparent collaboration is the key to achieve it.

The results of our investigation will be published here in this Noozhawk Asks section. Once or twice a month, we plan to do a review of what was asked and answered.

Thanks for asking!

Click Here to Get Started >

Reader Comments

Noozhawk is no longer accepting reader comments on our articles. Click here for the announcement. Readers are instead invited to submit letters to the editor by emailing them to [email protected]. Please provide your full name and community, as well as contact information for verification purposes only.

Daily Noozhawk

Subscribe to Noozhawk's A.M. Report, our free e-Bulletin sent out every day at 4:15 a.m. with Noozhawk's top stories, hand-picked by the editors.

Sign Up Now >