Pixel Tracker

Wednesday, February 20 , 2019, 10:14 pm | Overcast 49º

 
 
 
 

Joe Conason: The Trouble With Donald Trump

The wannabe Republican president is hardly what he claims to be

Everything we really need to know about the character of Donald Trump was revealed when the wannabe president frivolously accused President Barack Obama’s late grandparents of committing fraud with his birth announcement.

Trump told CNN that they had placed the Aug. 13, 1961, announcement in the Honolulu Star-Advertiser because they wanted to get “welfare” and other benefits. But this casual falsehood revealed only the tiniest hint of the truth about Trump that Americans will discover if he actually runs for the White House.

Anticipating such scrutiny, Trump should use more caution when mouthing off about “welfare,” for instance. His family wealth and his own business have both depended heavily on the corporate welfare that supports the real estate industry, starting with the Federal Housing Administration support that undergirded his father Fred’s residential empire more than a half-century ago.

The sudden refurbishing of Trump as a rugged individualist is as ridiculous as those Tea Party zealots who hate all government programs, except their Medicare. In Trump: The Deals and The Downfall, the classic biography by investigative journalist Wayne Barrett, the mythology of the self-made success is pulled aside to show a scion of family privilege, abused power and political sleaze.

Young Donald learned early on about the rental supplements, tax abatements, government loans and other state capitalist tools available in his native New York — especially to a budding developer whose daddy greased the necessary connections to the Democratic political machine.

When Trump was getting started, Mario Cuomo was governor — and Donald hired the governor’s son, Andrew, who has since ascended to that high office. Meanwhile, he lavished money on Democratic pols high and low, and they repaid him with favors that made his projects financially viable.

In short, Trump is hardly what he claims to be — and voters soon will realize that very few of the man’s boastful statements about himself and his record can stand up to the slightest scrutiny. “I was a great student. I went to the best schools,” he told a Tea Party rally in Florida recently.

Actually, he couldn’t cut it at the small New York City private school attended by his siblings, and he was removed to a military academy upstate that specialized in discipline for troubled and failing boys, where he barely earned a B average. From there, he went on to Fordham University and then the Wharton Business School at the University of Pennsylvania. While both are very fine institutions, Trump coasted academically, although he later bragged that he had earned “the highest grades possible.”

It is Trump’s bizarre remarks about President Obama, including his birthplace, his schooling and his literary career, that invite the examination of his own past. But perhaps it is pointless to criticize the bluster and hype that are, after all, the most important element in Trump’s success. Particularly for the Republicans whose party he may attempt to lead, the more pertinent questions concern his politics, policies and ideology. The answers can be summed up in a single word: opportunist.

Over the years, Trump has mostly donated money to Democrats, including Sens. Chuck Schumer, Dick Durbin and Harry Reid (that scourge of the Tea Party) and Rep. Anthony Weiner, the Brooklyn firebrand who often represents liberals on cable television. He gives to Republicans, too, but not nearly as much or as often. During the last cycle, he gave $10,000 to the National Republican Senatorial Committee — and $25,000 to the Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee. In 2004, he gave to George W. Bush and to John Kerry.

He vocally supported the bank and auto bailouts; he praised Obama before turning around to vilify him; he has endorsed higher taxes on the wealthy and sworn that he would never raise taxes, period. The single reliably Republican aspect of Trump’s life is his enduring connection with Roger Stone, a Nixon-vintage dirty trickster.

Watching him run will be fun — unless you’re a Republican who hopes to win back the White House.

Joe Conason writes for Creators Syndicate. Click here for more information, or click here to contact him.

Talk to Us!

Please take Noozhawk's audience survey to help us understand what you expect — and want — from us. It'll take you just a few minutes. Thank you!

Get Started >

Support Noozhawk Today

You are an important ally in our mission to deliver clear, objective, high-quality professional news reporting for Santa Barbara, Goleta and the rest of Santa Barbara County. Join the Hawks Club today to help keep Noozhawk soaring.

We offer four membership levels: $5 a month, $10 a month, $25 a month or $1 a week. Payments can be made using a credit card, Apple Pay or Google Pay, or click here for information on recurring credit-card payments and a mailing address for checks.

Thank you for your vital support.

Become a Noozhawk Supporter

First name
Last name
Email
Select your monthly membership
Or choose an annual membership
×

Payment Information

Membership Subscription

You are enrolling in . Thank you for joining the Hawks Club.

Payment Method

Pay by Credit Card:

Mastercard, Visa, American Express, Discover
One click only, please!

Pay with Apple Pay or Google Pay:

Noozhawk partners with Stripe to provide secure invoicing and payments processing.
You may cancel your membership at any time by sending an email to .(JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address).

  • Ask
  • Vote
  • Investigate
  • Answer

Noozhawk Asks: What’s Your Question?

Welcome to Noozhawk Asks, a new feature in which you ask the questions, you help decide what Noozhawk investigates, and you work with us to find the answers.

Here’s how it works: You share your questions with us in the nearby box. In some cases, we may work with you to find the answers. In others, we may ask you to vote on your top choices to help us narrow the scope. And we’ll be regularly asking you for your feedback on a specific issue or topic.

We also expect to work together with the reader who asked the winning questions to find the answer together. Noozhawk’s objective is to come at questions from a place of curiosity and openness, and we believe a transparent collaboration is the key to achieve it.

The results of our investigation will be published here in this Noozhawk Asks section. Once or twice a month, we plan to do a review of what was asked and answered.

Thanks for asking!

Click Here to Get Started >

Reader Comments

Noozhawk is no longer accepting reader comments on our articles. Click here for the announcement. Readers are instead invited to submit letters to the editor by emailing them to [email protected]. Please provide your full name and community, as well as contact information for verification purposes only.