Pixel Tracker

Monday, December 10 , 2018, 3:05 pm | Mostly Cloudy 62º


Mark Shields: Republicans Haven’t Even Fallen ‘In Like’ With Romney

GOP presidential candidate must change voters' perception that he 'rounds the edges'

TAMPA, Fla. — An axiom of American politics holds that, in choosing their presidential nominees, Democratic voters are prone to “fall in love” with the nominee, while less emotional Republicans generally “fall in line.”

Think about it. Democrats are vulnerable to long-shot, first-time candidates (George McGovern, Jimmy Carter, Bill Clinton, President Barack Obama), while Republican voters prefer the nominee who leads in the polls and has secured the endorsements of party leaders, and for whom this is not his first presidential campaign (Ronald Reagan, George H.W. Bush, Bob Dole, John McCain).

In 2012, according to nearly all recent public polls, Republican voters have overwhelmingly “fallen in line” behind the de facto GOP nominee, Mitt Romney. But a reasonable conclusion — after listening to 12 Florida voters who are either registered Republicans or who generally vote for Republicans in a fascinating two-hour focus group led by respected pollster Peter Hart for the Annenberg Public Policy Center of the University of Pennsylvania — is that these voters neither know nor like Romney. They would like to like him. But a little over six months before Election Day, these Floridians are unsure who their standard-bearer is or what he would do as president.

By the “would you want to have a beer with him?” test — which, it is fair to say, Republican George W. Bush won in both 2000 and 2004 over Democrats Al Gore and John Kerry — Romney, separate from his religious prohibition against drinking, flunks. His formal manner and personal wealth make him a remote figure.

To Republican Ron Romonchuk, 66, a retired consultant, Romney is a “1 percenter” who “never did things regular guys do.” Julie Saunders, 56, a paralegal and Romney supporter, finds the candidate “stiff,” with a “deer in the headlights” look. Frank Stagliano, 68, a retired headhunter who voted for George W. Bush twice but now supports Obama, found Romney’s sports talk unpersuasive: “A regular guy talks about (football quarterback) Peyton Manning and the team. Mitt talks about the team owners.”

But haunting Romney now is his successful primary campaign strategy, which consisted of making the negative case, serially, on why Rick Perry or Newt Gingrich or Rick Santorum should not be president — but failing to make a positive case for why he, himself, should be president.

When asked by Hart what advice he would offer to Romney, Jonathan Rosa, 27, a deputy police officer (who had voted for Romney in the Florida primary but now regrets not having voted for Santorum), said, “Stop outlining what other administrations have done wrong, and tell us what you’re going to do right.”

Romney’s perceived evasiveness on controversial issues remains a problem with these Florida Republicans. Brent Bennett put it succinctly: “He rounds the edges.” After prompting from Hart, Bennett summed up his feelings: “We want someone like Santorum, like Gingrich when he was at his best in debates, to have a position, to stick with the position and not apologize for that position, and not shade your answer to a question that matches what the particular audience you’re in front of might want to hear.”

Hart asked the other 11 their reaction to that statement. Every one of them agreed with it. Theresa Crudule, 30, tech vendor and committed conservative, contributed, “I don’t know if I can trust him to follow the Constitution.”

These voters overwhelmingly admire Romney as a devoted and faithful family man who has been exceptionally successful in business (although a few who are backing him expressed reservations, even suspicion, of how Romney’s Mormon faith might influence his presidential decision-making). Even though most of the group are disenchanted or contemptuous of Obama’s policies, more of them still saw Obama as “a regular guy” than Romney.

After Tampa, Romney’s task is clear: Without mentioning Obama, tell voters who you really are, what you really believe and what you really would do if you are elected president — and no “rounding the edges.”

Mark Shields is one of the most widely recognized political commentators in the United States. The former Washington Post editorial columnist appears regularly on CNN, on public television and on radio. Click here to contact him.

Support Noozhawk Today

You are an important ally in our mission to deliver clear, objective, high-quality professional news reporting for Santa Barbara, Goleta and the rest of Santa Barbara County. Join the Hawks Club today to help keep Noozhawk soaring.

We offer four membership levels: $5 a month, $10 a month, $25 a month or $1 a week. Payments can be made using a credit card, Apple Pay or Google Pay, or click here for information on recurring credit-card payments and a mailing address for checks.

Thank you for your vital support.

Become a Noozhawk Supporter

First name
Last name
Select your monthly membership
Or choose an annual membership

Payment Information

Membership Subscription

You are enrolling in . Thank you for joining the Hawks Club.

Payment Method

Pay by Credit Card:

Mastercard, Visa, American Express, Discover
One click only, please!

Pay with Apple Pay or Google Pay:

Noozhawk partners with Stripe to provide secure invoicing and payments processing.
You may cancel your membership at any time by sending an email to .(JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address).

  • Ask
  • Vote
  • Investigate
  • Answer

Noozhawk Asks: What’s Your Question?

Welcome to Noozhawk Asks, a new feature in which you ask the questions, you help decide what Noozhawk investigates, and you work with us to find the answers.

Here’s how it works: You share your questions with us in the nearby box. In some cases, we may work with you to find the answers. In others, we may ask you to vote on your top choices to help us narrow the scope. And we’ll be regularly asking you for your feedback on a specific issue or topic.

We also expect to work together with the reader who asked the winning questions to find the answer together. Noozhawk’s objective is to come at questions from a place of curiosity and openness, and we believe a transparent collaboration is the key to achieve it.

The results of our investigation will be published here in this Noozhawk Asks section. Once or twice a month, we plan to do a review of what was asked and answered.

Thanks for asking!

Click Here to Get Started >

Reader Comments

Noozhawk is no longer accepting reader comments on our articles. Click here for the announcement. Readers are instead invited to submit letters to the editor by emailing them to [email protected]. Please provide your full name and community, as well as contact information for verification purposes only.