Pixel Tracker

Monday, December 17 , 2018, 11:32 am |


Bill Cirone: D is for Very, Very Difficult

Propositions 1D, 1E are misleading and deserve a "no" vote

The May 19 special election will present some very difficult decisions for voters.

Bill Cirone
Bill Cirone

Several of the propositions will be especially tough for educators and those who want to be supportive of public education and children in California. Proposition 1D is perhaps the most difficult of all. I am voting no.

As background, the state budget deal forged by the Legislature attempted to bridge a $40 billion deficit. The number is so staggering most of us cannot comprehend a shortfall so large. Because of the tanking economy, revenues from income taxes, sales taxes, fees and real estate taxes dropped more sharply than anyone could have anticipated. This happened as costs continued to rise.

Ever since Proposition 13 passed in the early 1970s, schools have been financed almost exclusively by the state, rather than from local property taxes whose growth had been restricted. Education has become the largest single state expenditure, and as a result, when California’s economy is in trouble, schools and students take the direct hit. This year has been devastating.

The deal forged by the legislature to pass a budget was considered the least terrible of all the truly awful choices. The agreement tried to protect public education as best it could, based on an intricate web of propositions that would need to be approved by voters in May.

That’s where we stand now. The state budget deal hinges on the approval of the propositions on the ballot, in particular Propositions 1A and 1B. If 1A does not pass, all the others become moot; if the package does not pass, it is likely that even more draconian reductions will be imposed on schools.

But what about 1D? Its title is “Protects Children’s Services Funding. Helps Balance State Budget.”

As is often the case with the titles of state propositions, this one is highly misleading. It will in fact take millions of dollars away from children and families in Santa Barbara County and does little to balance the budget. It takes away the monies generated from the cigarette tax, as approved by voters in 1998 to be used for services for children from birth to age 5, and uses that money instead to help balance other parts of the budget.

Voters at the time supported these important efforts, understanding that prevention and intervention early in a child’s life can head off a long list of challenges that are damaging to society and far more expensive to address in later years.

As president of the First 5 Commission that was formed to use the money wisely in our county, I have seen firsthand the tremendous benefit these services have provided to young children and families, and their clear impact on preventing higher costs to society that would accrue later if such services were not available.
In our county, passage of Proposition 1D will result in a loss of at least $12.6 million over the next five years, along with the additional loss of funds brought into the county through matching state, federal and private grants. The statewide loss will amount to $1.6 billion over five years.

Ironically, the current economic climate has brought a serious increase in needs of children ages 0-5 and their families. First 5 Santa Barbara County funds a range of safety net services that reach thousands of children and families. These would no longer be provided if the proposition passes. We all know an ounce of prevention is worth a pound of cure.

Similarly, passage of Proposition 1E, for mental health services approved by earlier voter initiative, is cut from the same cloth as 1D. It takes away voter-approved funding from our most vulnerable citizens. I cannot in good conscience support it.

So we find ourselves in a Catch-22. The propositions need to pass in order for schools and children to avoid a much more powerful “hit” in terms of budget reductions. Yet passage of Proposition 1D will eliminate critical services to children that will result in higher remedial costs down the line. Passage of Proposition 1E does the same for those who require mental health services.

Everyone will have to decide which of the bad choices to make. Clearly, it is vital to our public schools for Propositions 1A and 1B to pass, or the resulting cuts will be unimaginable.

I believe that passage of 1D would have such a damaging effect on children and families in our community, and will cause the need for such increased expenditures in the future, that the proportionally small generation of revenue and the further loss of local control are unjustified.

I plan to vote no on Propositions 1D and 1E.

— Bill Cirone is Santa Barbara County’s superintendent of schools.

Support Noozhawk Today

You are an important ally in our mission to deliver clear, objective, high-quality professional news reporting for Santa Barbara, Goleta and the rest of Santa Barbara County. Join the Hawks Club today to help keep Noozhawk soaring.

We offer four membership levels: $5 a month, $10 a month, $25 a month or $1 a week. Payments can be made using a credit card, Apple Pay or Google Pay, or click here for information on recurring credit-card payments and a mailing address for checks.

Thank you for your vital support.

Become a Noozhawk Supporter

First name
Last name
Select your monthly membership
Or choose an annual membership

Payment Information

Membership Subscription

You are enrolling in . Thank you for joining the Hawks Club.

Payment Method

Pay by Credit Card:

Mastercard, Visa, American Express, Discover
One click only, please!

Pay with Apple Pay or Google Pay:

Noozhawk partners with Stripe to provide secure invoicing and payments processing.
You may cancel your membership at any time by sending an email to .(JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address).

  • Ask
  • Vote
  • Investigate
  • Answer

Noozhawk Asks: What’s Your Question?

Welcome to Noozhawk Asks, a new feature in which you ask the questions, you help decide what Noozhawk investigates, and you work with us to find the answers.

Here’s how it works: You share your questions with us in the nearby box. In some cases, we may work with you to find the answers. In others, we may ask you to vote on your top choices to help us narrow the scope. And we’ll be regularly asking you for your feedback on a specific issue or topic.

We also expect to work together with the reader who asked the winning questions to find the answer together. Noozhawk’s objective is to come at questions from a place of curiosity and openness, and we believe a transparent collaboration is the key to achieve it.

The results of our investigation will be published here in this Noozhawk Asks section. Once or twice a month, we plan to do a review of what was asked and answered.

Thanks for asking!

Click Here to Get Started >

Reader Comments

Noozhawk is no longer accepting reader comments on our articles. Click here for the announcement. Readers are instead invited to submit letters to the editor by emailing them to [email protected]. Please provide your full name and community, as well as contact information for verification purposes only.

Daily Noozhawk

Subscribe to Noozhawk's A.M. Report, our free e-Bulletin sent out every day at 4:15 a.m. with Noozhawk's top stories, hand-picked by the editors.

Sign Up Now >