Friday, April 27 , 2018, 2:39 am | Fair 48º


Mark Shields: One and a Half Cheers for the Bishops

Catholic hierarchy has made mistakes, but it deserves praise for speaking out about the budget debate

As a practicing — and an obviously very imperfect — Catholic, I have had more than a few disagreements with the leadership of my church. For example, I still find it both irrational and indefensible that talented, magnanimous and charismatic women are denied the opportunity to serve as priests. (It is not as though there is an overflow supply of male candidates with similar qualities.)

The church hierarchy’s widespread failure to stop criminal sexual acts by priests against defenseless children and then, when made aware of those crimes, to give priority and resources not to comforting and making whole the victims, but instead to damage control of the institutional church and to covering up for the clerical abusers is unforgivable. The toll: thousands of lives tortured and broken, surrendering of much of the church’s moral authority, and a price tag in settlement of abuse claims and legal fees of nearly $2.7 billion.

But I cherish and admire much about the church. The late Cardinal James Hickey was archbishop of Washington, where he increased tenfold the number of people being fed, clothed, sheltered and counseled by the archdiocese. When there was grumbling from some of the more affluent in the pews that too much of the church’s limited revenues was going to people and neighborhoods who were not even Catholic, Hickey offered this by way of rebuttal: “We serve the homeless not because they are Catholic, but because we are Catholic. If we don’t care for the sick, educate the young, care for the homeless, then we cannot call ourselves the church of Jesus Christ.”

Which brings me to the recent letter from the United States Conference of Catholic Bishops to every member of the House of Representatives on the human dimensions of the federal budget debate that has preoccupied Washington.

Signed by Bishops Henry Hubbard of Albany, N.Y., the chairman of the Bishops Committee on International Justice and Peace, and Stephen Blare, chairman of the Committee on Domestic Peace and Human Development, the letter was clear and unambiguous that “a central moral measure of any budget proposal is how it affects ‘the least of these’ (Matthew 25). The needs of those who are hungry and homeless, without work or in poverty should come first.”

Toward that objective, “a just framework for future budgets cannot rely on disproportionate cuts in essential services to poor persons.” Then followed the expressed “fear that some proposed changes to Medicare and Medicaid could leave more elderly and poor without the assurance of adequate and affordable health care,” because block grants could give states more flexibility, “but leave them with inadequate resources as costs grow or more people need health care in future recessions.”

If Medicare were converted “into a voucher program, (it) could shift rising health-care costs to vulnerable seniors and those who are poor without controlling these costs.”

Remember, these are the same Catholic bishops who, because of their uncompromising opposition to legalized abortion, have been accused by many Democrats of being committed allies of the Republican Party. But Republicans could not have been cheering the letter’s last paragraph, which asserted “the moral measure of this budget debate is not which party wins or which powerful interests prevail, but rather how those who are jobless, hungry, homeless or poor are treated,” because “they have the most compelling moral claim on our consciences and our common resources.”

For speaking out in this Easter season, the bishops deserve at least one and a half cheers.

Mark Shields is one of the most widely recognized political commentators in the United States. The former Washington Post editorial columnist appears regularly on CNN, on public television and on radio. Click here to contact him.

  • Ask
  • Vote
  • Investigate
  • Answer

Noozhawk Asks: What’s Your Question?

Welcome to Noozhawk Asks, a new feature in which you ask the questions, you help decide what Noozhawk investigates, and you work with us to find the answers.

Here’s how it works: You share your questions with us in the nearby box. In some cases, we may work with you to find the answers. In others, we may ask you to vote on your top choices to help us narrow the scope. And we’ll be regularly asking you for your feedback on a specific issue or topic.

We also expect to work together with the reader who asked the winning questions to find the answer together. Noozhawk’s objective is to come at questions from a place of curiosity and openness, and we believe a transparent collaboration is the key to achieve it.

The results of our investigation will be published here in this Noozhawk Asks section. Once or twice a month, we plan to do a review of what was asked and answered.

Thanks for asking!

Click Here to Get Started >

Support Noozhawk Today

You are an important ally in our mission to deliver clear, objective, high-quality professional news reporting for Santa Barbara, Goleta and the rest of Santa Barbara County. Join the Hawks Club today to help keep Noozhawk soaring.

We offer four membership levels: $5 a month, $10 a month, $25 a month or $1 a week. Payments can be made through PayPal below, or click here for information on recurring credit-card payments.

Thank you for your vital support.

Maestro, Mastercard, Visa, American Express, Discover, Debit

Reader Comments

Noozhawk is no longer accepting reader comments on our articles. Click here for the announcement. Readers are instead invited to submit letters to the editor by emailing them to [email protected]. Please provide your full name and community, as well as contact information for verification purposes only.

Daily Noozhawk

Subscribe to Noozhawk's A.M. Report, our free e-Bulletin sent out every day at 4:15 a.m. with Noozhawk's top stories, hand-picked by the editors.

Sign Up Now >