Pixel Tracker

Tuesday, February 19 , 2019, 7:20 am | Fair 35º

 
 
 
 

Cinema in Focus: ‘The Conspirator’ Full of Intrigue, and The Rest Is History

Robert Redford film tells the story of the first woman executed by the U.S. government

3 Stars — Challenging

The Conspirator tells the story of Mary Surratt, the first woman executed by the U.S. government who many believe was innocent. She was the owner of the boarding house where the plot to kill President Abraham Lincoln was hatched by John Wilkes Booth (Toby Kebbell).

The military tribunal of nine northern generals found Surratt guilty of joining the conspiracy. Though asking for leniency, the generals’ appeal for life in prison for her was declined, as was a subsequent legal stay by her attorneys when President Andrew Johnson decided that she and three others should be hung on July 7, 1865.

Though historians and legal experts disagree about Surratt’s guilt, it’s clear that in the view of her attorney, Frederick Aiken (James McAvoy), a decorated Union officer who served in the war, she was innocent. Although Aiken went on to become a Supreme Court justice (a fact left out of the film), his disgust at the proceedings as well as his love for journalism caused him to leave the legal profession and become editor of The Washington Post.

A helpful background to understand the film is Aiken’s view of her innocence in his obituary of 1878. Dying from war injury complications at age 41, his obituary says in part: “When that unfortunate victim of Republican fury, Mrs. Mary Surratt, was dragged from her bed at midnight by the brutal minions of Stanton, and hurried before a court-martial organized to convict, Col. Aiken was one of the gallant few in the District that dared to lift his voice in behalf of justice and right at the imminent risk of his life and nobly undertook to conduct her defense. His defense of Mrs. Surratt is one of the ... most praiseworthy efforts on record.”

Masterfully directed by Robert Redford and written by James D. Solomon, Robin Wright provides an Oscar-worthy performance as Surratt.

A genteel Southern woman who was a devout Roman Catholic, Surratt struggled after the death of her alcoholic husband to care for her family. Taking in boarders to survive financially during the Civil War, she did not allow her son John (Johnny Simmons) to enlist. But his passion for the cause of the South led him to befriend Booth and invite him into the Surratt boarding house for visits. It is there that the assassination of Lincoln and the attack on Secretary of State William H. Seward and other officials were planned.

The antagonist in this version of history is Secretary of War Edwin M. Stanton (Kevin Kline). Resolute in his opinion that Surratt and the other conspirators must be executed for the stability of the nation, it is his insistence that brought this about, including the use of a military tribunal rather than a civil court. Less than two years after the execution, Congress passed a law that civilians cannot be tried in a military court.

The fear of a conspiracy is part of the human experience. That there are those who “conspire against us” can cause us to set aside whatever rights they might have and take whatever action we think we need to take to protect ourselves. This was how President Johnson reacted when he overturned the civil judge’s appeal for a civil trial and said that Surratt had “kept the nest that hatched the egg.” Justice requires that we have wisdom in knowing who is and who is not guilty by taking the time to examine the evidence rather than reacting out of fear and jumping to judgment for our self-protection.

Discussion:

» When John Surratt is captured and tried only two years later, the jury couldn’t decide on his guilt and he was set free. However, the timing of Mary’s trial occurring so quickly after Lincoln’s assassination undoubtedly resulted in her conviction and execution. How do you think we can best protect ourselves from vengeance at times when emotions are running high like they were at that time?

» In several ways Mary Surratt indicated that she knew something sinister was being planned in her boarding house. What would you do if your son or daughter was planning a crime in your home?

» Anna Surratt (Evan Rachel Wood) was asked to choose between protecting her brother and defending her mother. This is an impossible choice. What would you have done if you were in her place?

— Cinema in Focus is a social and spiritual movie commentary. Hal Conklin is former mayor of Santa Barbara and Denny Wayman is pastor of Free Methodist Church, 1435 Cliff Drive. For more reviews, visit www.cinemainfocus.com.

Talk to Us!

Please take Noozhawk's audience survey to help us understand what you expect — and want — from us. It'll take you just a few minutes. Thank you!

Get Started >

Support Noozhawk Today

You are an important ally in our mission to deliver clear, objective, high-quality professional news reporting for Santa Barbara, Goleta and the rest of Santa Barbara County. Join the Hawks Club today to help keep Noozhawk soaring.

We offer four membership levels: $5 a month, $10 a month, $25 a month or $1 a week. Payments can be made using a credit card, Apple Pay or Google Pay, or click here for information on recurring credit-card payments and a mailing address for checks.

Thank you for your vital support.

Become a Noozhawk Supporter

First name
Last name
Email
Select your monthly membership
Or choose an annual membership
×

Payment Information

Membership Subscription

You are enrolling in . Thank you for joining the Hawks Club.

Payment Method

Pay by Credit Card:

Mastercard, Visa, American Express, Discover
One click only, please!

Pay with Apple Pay or Google Pay:

Noozhawk partners with Stripe to provide secure invoicing and payments processing.
You may cancel your membership at any time by sending an email to .(JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address).

  • Ask
  • Vote
  • Investigate
  • Answer

Noozhawk Asks: What’s Your Question?

Welcome to Noozhawk Asks, a new feature in which you ask the questions, you help decide what Noozhawk investigates, and you work with us to find the answers.

Here’s how it works: You share your questions with us in the nearby box. In some cases, we may work with you to find the answers. In others, we may ask you to vote on your top choices to help us narrow the scope. And we’ll be regularly asking you for your feedback on a specific issue or topic.

We also expect to work together with the reader who asked the winning questions to find the answer together. Noozhawk’s objective is to come at questions from a place of curiosity and openness, and we believe a transparent collaboration is the key to achieve it.

The results of our investigation will be published here in this Noozhawk Asks section. Once or twice a month, we plan to do a review of what was asked and answered.

Thanks for asking!

Click Here to Get Started >

Reader Comments

Noozhawk is no longer accepting reader comments on our articles. Click here for the announcement. Readers are instead invited to submit letters to the editor by emailing them to [email protected]. Please provide your full name and community, as well as contact information for verification purposes only.