Thursday, November 23 , 2017, 10:24 pm | Fair 56º

 
 
 
 

Local News

Smart Meters Focus of Santa Barbara Forum

Panelists voice concerns about consumer rights, protections and privacy

National experts led a discussion Thursday night on the dangers of smart meters at a “Get Smart” town hall forum at Fess Parker’s DoubleTree Resort.

The panel said that smart meters, or meters that can record the electricity a household uses by the second, are replacing old electric meters without permission at the user’s cost. Southern California Edison has said it plans to install the smart meters throughout the area by 2012 or sooner.

According to event organizers, the SCE had agreed to send a representative to the forum, but that the company pulled out at the last minute.

The forum, organized by the Santa Barbara Tea Party and which drew in more than 300 people, featured Supervisor Anthony Farrrington, D-Lake County, Dr. Mark Toney of TURN, Tyson Slocum of Public Citizen; Cindy Sage of Sage Associates, author Orlean Koehle and Joshua Hart of Stop Smart Meters.

The panel discussed issues ranging from the effects of smart meter installations on constitutional rights, health, privacy, national security and the environment. Much of the panelists’ discussion revolved around the implementation and installation of the smart meters without asking for consent.

“The root of the problem is that the utility companies never initiated a public consultation,” Hart said. “Utility companies are proposing increased rates of $7 billion, and the public was never consulted.”

Slocum said there are some families who would benefit from the ability for the smart meters to communicate with smart appliances in order to increase energy efficiency, but people shouldn’t be forced to adopt this technology.

“Some families would like a smart meter and they should be able to have one, but forcing that is a dumb policy and only benefits utility companies,” he said.

Koehle said the utility companies claim they are following federal law by mandating these installations, but when she consulted a lawyer, she found that was not the case.

“Upon reading the bill, it does not mandate utility companies to install smart meters in homes; they are only to offer them and install them upon customer request,” Koehle said as she read from the lawyer’s response. 

Slocum said that Maryland reviewed a similar proposal from utility companies last year and found that smart meters were not cost-effective, and that it didn’t make sense to force people to have the meters installed.

The installations also pose health threats, especially for those who are “electrosensitive,” disabled or elderly, according to the panelists.

The smart meters and antennas communicate with radio frequencies that create “dirty electricity,” which emit carcinogens and neurotoxins, Sage said.

“A woman called in who said she bought a house in Half Moon Bay where they installed a smart meter in her house,” Hart said. “She couldn’t sleep in her home, she had hot flashes and ringing in ears throughout the night, and resorted to sleeping in a car in the church parking lot.”

Toney discussed time-based pricing that would charge higher rates during the daytime and the hottest days of the year.

“I call it critical peak pricing,” he said. “During the 10 hottest days of year, they want to charge a tenfold increase on those days. Talk about a health threat.”

Koehle said the government would have too much control of people’s lives by shutting off power to certain appliances during peak usage times.

“There’s a concern of remote shut-offs,” Toney said. “When PG&E started putting in smart meters, they became trigger happy when it came to shut-offs.”

Koehle noted a case in Switzerland in which a person with a smart meter had the washing machine turned off at 3 p.m. and came back on at 8 p.m.

Hart argued that the constant stream of data leaves people’s personal information exposed.

“When data is relayed every four seconds, this is valuable information for corporations and marketers,” he said.

Farrington noted that there was no environmental review when it came to the deployment of 15 million meters.

“It’s a new utility communication and infrastructure, but there was zero dollars being spent of environmental review — that’s unconscionable,” Farrington said, adding that it’s an issue that transcends party lines.

Above all, Hart said, the public needs to be informed of the government’s major investments.

“We demand the right to be informed by our country’s major investments, our right to health and privacy and safety, and we want a moratorium on smart meter installations.”

Noozhawk staff writer Alex Kacik can be reached at .(JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address). Follow Noozhawk on Twitter: @noozhawk, @NoozhawkNews and @NoozhawkBiz. Become a fan of Noozhawk on Facebook.

  • Ask
  • Vote
  • Investigate
  • Answer

Noozhawk Asks: What’s Your Question?

Welcome to Noozhawk Asks, a new feature in which you ask the questions, you help decide what Noozhawk investigates, and you work with us to find the answers.

Here’s how it works: You share your questions with us in the nearby box. In some cases, we may work with you to find the answers. In others, we may ask you to vote on your top choices to help us narrow the scope. And we’ll be regularly asking you for your feedback on a specific issue or topic.

We also expect to work together with the reader who asked the winning questions to find the answer together. Noozhawk’s objective is to come at questions from a place of curiosity and openness, and we believe a transparent collaboration is the key to achieve it.

The results of our investigation will be published here in this Noozhawk Asks section. Once or twice a month, we plan to do a review of what was asked and answered.

Thanks for asking!

Click here to get started >

Support Noozhawk Today

You are an important ally in our mission to deliver clear, objective, high-quality professional news reporting for Santa Barbara, Goleta and the rest of Santa Barbara County. Join the Hawks Club today to help keep Noozhawk soaring.

We offer four membership levels: $5 a month, $10 a month, $25 a month or $1 a week. Payments can be made through PayPal below, or click here for information on recurring credit-card payments.

Thank you for your vital support.



Daily Noozhawk

Subscribe to Noozhawk's A.M. Report, our free e-Bulletin sent out every day at 4:15 a.m. with Noozhawk's top stories, hand-picked by the editors.

Sign Up Now >