Thursday, April 26 , 2018, 1:00 am | Fair 52º

 
 
 
 

Tam Hunt: The Local Feed-in Tariff Solution

Municipalities have the power to accelerate renewable energy transition in their communities

Guaranteed payments for renewable energy, generally known as feed-in tariffs, or FITs, have become increasingly popular in the last few years. Pioneered in the United States in the late 1970s and ‘80s and then perfected in Europe in the last 10 years, FITs have been very effective in bringing large amounts of renewable energy online quickly.

Tam Hunt
Tam Hunt

A new report from the National Renewable Energy Laboratory, one of our nation’s preeminent research organizations, has found that FITs have often been the most effective policy tool for new renewables, and the most cost-effective, too. This is a welcome surprise to many of us in the renewable energy industry. The report concluded that FITs can bring renewables online quickly and “often more cost-effectively than under competitive solicitations.” (“Competitive solicitations” refers to systems like California’s Renewable Portfolio Standard, which has struggled for years to achieve the mandated level of renewables.)

California and a couple of other states have “weak FITs” in place. California’s current FIT, enacted by AB 1969 in early 2008, has brought only about 10 megawatts of new projects online. California’s previous FIT, under the federal Public Utility Regulatory Policies Act that was effective in the 1980s, brought about 10,000 megawatts online! Clearly, we need more, as I’ve written about in previous columns.

The good news is that the Public Utilities Commission has proposed to expand, under its own very broad constitutional authority, the current FIT to 10 megawatts (up from the current 1.5 megawatt limit) and has suggested that the pricing process needs to be revisited. If pricing is improved — eliminating the “marke-price referent” formula, which unwisely links renewable energy to the price of electricity from a new natural gas plant — the PUC proposal could itself be a major boost for community-scale renewable energy projects throughout California.

At the same time, a number of new FIT bills are pending in the Legislature. AB 1106 is now the best of the bunch and will, according to the author, Assemblyman Felipe Fuentes, D-Los Angeles, be amended to allow for more favorable pricing than under current law. This is a key change and will make this bill far better than its competitors. It also expands the size cap to 20 megawatts, another necessary change.

But what about local measures? Can’t local governments and businesses get into this game? The short answer: yes. Here’s how:

I’ve written previously about Community Choice Aggregation, or CCA, and how it is a highly promising way for cities and counties to take control of their energy future. But here’s the new twist: CCA can also be used to enact a local FIT.

Just about every jurisdiction has numerous rooftops and parking lots that are aching to be solarized. The problem is that pricing under current policies and market conditions is often difficult — just look at the large white rooftops when you fly into any airport in California and ask yourself why aren’t they all covered in solar panels? The answer is that it’s often not economically feasible due to lack of sufficient on-site load or lack of interest by building owners in taking the time to develop their resource.

To be clear, here’s the problem: many rooftops and parking lots that could support solar systems from 100 kilowatts to about 500 kilowatts aren’t being solarized because this size segment is “orphaned” by current policies and market conditions. There is a huge potential around the state for solar on these rooftops and parking lots. (A wonky aside: in the state FIT bill, AB 1106, that I’ve been promoting, we don’t recommend that the state-level FIT provide price support for facilities in this range because of the potentially higher cost to ratepayers around the state. But with the local jobs and other economic benefits, as well as low- or zero-interest bonds available to local governments, there is the potential to make these types of systems cost-effective).

Under CCA, however, local governments can create a local FIT option because CCA gives rate control to the members of the CCA organization (cities and counties). CCAs can also phase in service to their customers. For example, the San Joaquin Valley Power Authority, which is the furthest along in California in becoming an active CCA organization, plans to serve its own members’ power needs first (government buildings), then bring in industrial, then commercial and finally residential customers. This is a phased approach that takes some of the risk out of the CCA business model.

Following the same strategy — but with a new twist — CCA organizations may implement CCA initially as a way to incentivize the development of 100-500 kilowatt solar systems on rooftops and parking lots. They can do this by buying this power from private developers under a local feed-in tariff, and using this power to meet their own needs. Local governments may even be able to use zero-interest federal bonds (CREBs or QECBs) to provide low- or no-cost financing opportunities for private sector entities wishing to build these solar facilities and sell power to the CCA organization.

This is an elegant and creative way to phase in CCA, utilize unused rooftops and parking lots for solar, and create economic opportunities — and green jobs — for many private sector entities. Under this approach, cities and counties may gain early support for CCA and strongly stimulate local economies into leading the charge for the green energy economy.

CCA, and the CCA-based FIT, is one of the most powerful tools available to cities and counties to accelerate the renewable energy transition and spur a broader movement in their regions.

— Tam Hunt is a renewable energy consultant and a lecturer in renewable energy law and policy at the Bren School of Environmental Science & Management at UCSB.

  • Ask
  • Vote
  • Investigate
  • Answer

Noozhawk Asks: What’s Your Question?

Welcome to Noozhawk Asks, a new feature in which you ask the questions, you help decide what Noozhawk investigates, and you work with us to find the answers.

Here’s how it works: You share your questions with us in the nearby box. In some cases, we may work with you to find the answers. In others, we may ask you to vote on your top choices to help us narrow the scope. And we’ll be regularly asking you for your feedback on a specific issue or topic.

We also expect to work together with the reader who asked the winning questions to find the answer together. Noozhawk’s objective is to come at questions from a place of curiosity and openness, and we believe a transparent collaboration is the key to achieve it.

The results of our investigation will be published here in this Noozhawk Asks section. Once or twice a month, we plan to do a review of what was asked and answered.

Thanks for asking!

Click Here to Get Started >

Support Noozhawk Today

You are an important ally in our mission to deliver clear, objective, high-quality professional news reporting for Santa Barbara, Goleta and the rest of Santa Barbara County. Join the Hawks Club today to help keep Noozhawk soaring.

We offer four membership levels: $5 a month, $10 a month, $25 a month or $1 a week. Payments can be made through PayPal below, or click here for information on recurring credit-card payments.

Thank you for your vital support.


Maestro, Mastercard, Visa, American Express, Discover, Debit

Reader Comments

Noozhawk is no longer accepting reader comments on our articles. Click here for the announcement. Readers are instead invited to submit letters to the editor by emailing them to [email protected]. Please provide your full name and community, as well as contact information for verification purposes only.

Daily Noozhawk

Subscribe to Noozhawk's A.M. Report, our free e-Bulletin sent out every day at 4:15 a.m. with Noozhawk's top stories, hand-picked by the editors.

Sign Up Now >