Sunday, February 25 , 2018, 12:19 am | Fair 48º


Mark Cromer: America’s Third Act

Like ‘Bleeding Kansas’ before it, Arizona may foreshadow a coming conflict

The real question surrounding Arizona’s attempt to crack down on illegal immigration is not whether its new law will survive legal challenges or some other bureaucratic end-run to circumvent it, but whether the American nation once again faces fundamental differences that simply can’t be reconciled.

Mark Cromer
Mark Cromer

And if so, is America now sliding inexorably toward violent confrontation?

The hurricane of vitriolic hyperbole that erupted in the wake of Gov. Jan Brewer signing what is claimed to be the “toughest” law in the nation against illegal immigration highlights an America that is more starkly divided than perhaps at anytime since the social upheaval that rocked the nation during the late 1960s.

Arizonians fed up over out-of-control illegal immigration and the toxic histrionics its new law has sparked from business class elites and their odd bedfellows in the Latino pan-nationalist movement again exposes a dangerous balkanization of America.

The risk today lies not along the fringes, but directly in the middle.

The right-wing militia movements that have ostensibly seen dramatic membership growth since President Barack Obama’s election and the radical left’s umbrella movement of virulent racialists and violent anarchists in the nation’s major cities have long simmered on the sidelines, stewing in their mutual inability to really matter much in U.S. political outcomes.

For all the romanticizing of the campus upheavals that stretched from 1965 to 1969, the ultimate result was Richard Nixon in the White House. The shootings at Kent State 40 years ago this month were followed by Nixon’s 1972 ‘Law & Order’ landslide.

And consider that throughout the 1970s and early ‘80s the fabled Weather Underground and revolutionary farm teams such as the Black Liberation Army and the Symbionese Liberation Army collectively detonated bombs, robbed banks and murdered people across the country, only to be rewarded with the counter revolution of the Reagan era.

But the vast sweep of middle America that has long stood as a socioeconomic seawall against the violent chaos that has washed across many other nations is now rapidly eroding in front of our eyes under a tide of economic despair and a growing suspicion that they have been betrayed.

Few issues feed that nagging sense of betrayal like illegal immigration.

The ink of Gov. Brewer’s signature hadn’t even dried on Arizona’s SB 1070 before the weeping, wailing and gnashing of teeth commenced from open-border advocates, who echoed the outbursts of hysteria that followed the passage of California’s Proposition 187 in 1994.

Then as now, the airwaves and headlines were filled with recrimination from those who reap the benefits of illegal immigration, whether in hard profits or demographic politics. Wild-eyed shrieks of “Nazis!” and “Racists!” and “Hatemongers!” were commonplace, and it seemed no smear was too fantastically false or ethically out of bounds to level against the proposition’s supporters.

And so the vast majority of Californians who voted for Proposition 187 learned that they weren’t just demanding that the rule of law and some common sense be applied to staunch the illegal immigration that was sinking their schools, jamming their hospitals, draining their coffers and filling their jails, but rather that they were the political descendants of Adolf Hitler and the modern torch bearers of his genocidal agenda.

Obscene analogies to the Holocaust were casually kicked around as opponents likened Proposition 187’s elimination of public benefits for illegal immigrants to the social blueprint that led to death camps such as Dachau and Auschwitz and the wanton slaughter of tens of millions of people.

Like Arizona’s new law — which is wildly popular among residents of the Grand Canyon State and is supported by 65 percent of Americans in national polls — California’s own effort to stop the tidal wave of illegal immigration pouring across its southern border was passed by 60 percent of voters, one of the most sweeping electoral rebukes of government malfeasance in the state’s modern history. Despite such a popular mandate, however, the legislation was eventually killed in 1999 by the subterfuge of then newly elected governor Gray Davis, who cynically let it die in “mediation.”

Now it’s Arizona’s turn.

During the past three weeks, America has watched as the overwhelming majority of Arizona’s citizens have been denigrated and smeared in a ferocious onslaught portraying them as cowboy Klansmen looking for Mexican nationals to hang. In San Francisco and Los Angeles — twin cities that have seen American citizens brutally murdered on their streets as a direct result of their so-called “sanctuary” policies — illegal immigrants and their supporters have staged rallies vowing a violent response to Arizona’s law, and both city councils have vowed to harm Arizona economically.

These reactions merely feed the suspicions of most American citizens that illegal immigrants are glorified squatters who game the system while remaining rabidly loyal to their home countries (and that’s mostly Mexico), while the professional political class brazenly panders to business interests addicted to cheap labor and lax employment laws.

For all the heat Arizona has raised, at the root of what’s happening is a stone cold question: What happens when a majority of Americans — many of whom are well armed — determine that the government has become a malignant tumor that facilitates a cancer of lawlessness that enriches their corporate benefactors at the expense of the average citizen?

What happens when the majority of Americans decide they have had enough of being called Nazis and racist child-killers and are no longer willing to either ignore it or talk past it or be shouted down?

What happens when they conclude that it’s not America’s immigration system — the most generous immigration system of all developed nations — that’s broken, but rather the government is so rotted to the core that it is no longer salvageable?

What happens when it’s not 11 states attempting to secede from the union in a four-year familial bloodbath, but rather 200 million Americans collectively reaching the conclusion that Washington has betrayed its right to govern by auctioning off the sovereignty of the nation, subverting the rule of law and sabotaging the will of the majority?

What happens on the day the majority decides there is nothing left to talk about and no point in voting?

What happens then?

While America will never see another Gettysburg, another Antietam, another Shiloh, if the current divide continues to expand and harden as the economic prospects of average Americans continue to plummet, then the government is closer than it probably cares to think to an explosion of destabilizing violence that could fatally undermine its legitimacy.

This is indeed the fundamental danger, and it is being highlighted in Arizona today.

If the majority of Americans’ estrangement from the government continues apace while epic numbers of immigrants continue to cross the borders not just illegally but defiantly, then Washington will inevitably face a violent reckoning all over the country.

Cocooned in the cozy gloss of their martini lunch schedule, the bloated Beltway aristocracy still seems inclined to dismiss the growing disenfranchisement from middle America and its vocalizations as “crazy talk.”

But if Washington has any sanity left whatsoever, they will be thankful a majority of Americans are still willing to talk, write letters and vote — for now.

They continue to ignore those voices at their great peril.

— Southern California journalist Mark Cromer writes frequently about immigration.

  • Ask
  • Vote
  • Investigate
  • Answer

Noozhawk Asks: What’s Your Question?

Welcome to Noozhawk Asks, a new feature in which you ask the questions, you help decide what Noozhawk investigates, and you work with us to find the answers.

Here’s how it works: You share your questions with us in the nearby box. In some cases, we may work with you to find the answers. In others, we may ask you to vote on your top choices to help us narrow the scope. And we’ll be regularly asking you for your feedback on a specific issue or topic.

We also expect to work together with the reader who asked the winning questions to find the answer together. Noozhawk’s objective is to come at questions from a place of curiosity and openness, and we believe a transparent collaboration is the key to achieve it.

The results of our investigation will be published here in this Noozhawk Asks section. Once or twice a month, we plan to do a review of what was asked and answered.

Thanks for asking!

Click here to get started >

Support Noozhawk Today

You are an important ally in our mission to deliver clear, objective, high-quality professional news reporting for Santa Barbara, Goleta and the rest of Santa Barbara County. Join the Hawks Club today to help keep Noozhawk soaring.

We offer four membership levels: $5 a month, $10 a month, $25 a month or $1 a week. Payments can be made through PayPal below, or click here for information on recurring credit-card payments.

Thank you for your vital support.

Reader Comments

Noozhawk is no longer accepting reader comments on our articles. Click here for the announcement. Readers are instead invited to submit letters to the editor by emailing them to [email protected]. Please provide your full name and community, as well as contact information for verification purposes only.

Daily Noozhawk

Subscribe to Noozhawk's A.M. Report, our free e-Bulletin sent out every day at 4:15 a.m. with Noozhawk's top stories, hand-picked by the editors.

Sign Up Now >