Sunday, October 21 , 2018, 12:17 am | Fair 56º

 
 
 
 

Mark Shields: To ‘Misspeak’ About War Is to Mislead

Connecticut Attorney General and Senate candidate Richard Blumenthal won't own up to his lies about serving in Vietnam

When political candidates are caught exaggerating their academic, athletic or, even, their romantic successes, I am generally forgiving. Maybe it has something to do with Original Sin and the human condition. But many of us seem occasionally unable to resist the temptation to harmlessly embellish our own stories.

Mark Shields
Mark Shields

But when it comes to serious charges that a man has made self-serving exaggerations about his personal military service during wartime, I lack tolerance. Of course, the accused individual shall have the full chance to refute such damning allegations.

That was the case, this past week, when Connecticut Attorney General Richard Blumenthal, previously the heavy November favorite to keep his state’s open U.S. Senate seat in Democratic hands, sought to rebut the New York Times’ front-page story that he had publicly misrepresented himself as having served as a member of the U.S. military during the Vietnam War.

Blumenthal, a man of authentic academic achievements — Phi Beta Kappa from Harvard College and editor-in-chief of the Yale Law School Journal — with an earned reputation for being both precise and deliberate in his speech, resorted to the language of the dissembler: “On a few occasions, I have misspoken about my service, and I regret that,” he said. “And I take full responsibility.”

“I take full responsibility”? Who else might be responsible for what Blumenthal said on public platforms? Nobody had suggested that a diabolical ventriloquist had been uttering those false words.

But in all my years on this planet, I have never heard any straightforward, truth-telling individual, when caught in a web of whoppers, use any variation of “I have misspoken.” These are weasel words that raise warning signals much like, “I did not have sexual relations with that woman, Miss Lewinsky.”

The mystery is, why did Blumenthal — who, unlike so many of his classmates during the Vietnam War, did enlist in the Marine Corps, endure the fierce challenge of Parris Island boot camp and then fulfill his six years of Marine Reserve obligations — feel the irresistible need to pretend that he had fought in Vietnam?

That’s exactly what Blumenthal did when he told Connecticut crowds that “we have learned something important since the days that I served in Vietnam,” as well as, “I wore the uniform in Vietnam and many came back ... to all sorts of disrespect.” To a 2003 rally, which included many military families supporting U.S. troops in Iraq, he said, “When we returned, we saw nothing like this.”

Unable to discredit the Times’ story, Blumenthal employed an old political ploy: When you cannot contradict the substance, attack the source. The Times is attacked for having taken a lead from the campaign of one of Blumenthal’s Republican opponents. And the point is? The story was independently and thoroughly reported — the words are Blumenthal’s own. It is a not a compilation of blind quotes.

“Serving during Vietnam,” which Blumenthal cannot inaccurately say that he did, is as profoundly different from “serving in Vietnam” as “being the police officer who bravely saved the drowning child” would be different from “seeing the police officer who bravely saved the drowning child.”

Nobody, without real problems, misremembers about being in a war zone where your fellow Americans are on an hourly basis losing their limbs and their lives. What this is about is not what Blumenthal did 40 years ago, which was legal and honorable service. No, this is about what Blumenthal has, himself, said falsely — and too often — that he did 40 years ago.

You can overstate or hyperbolize about scoring the winning touchdown or being first in your high-school graduating class. But never fake having served your country in the war zone during wartime when you haven’t even left stateside, because to “misspeak” about war is to mislead.

Mark Shields is one of the most widely recognized political commentators in the United States. The former Washington Post editorial columnist appears regularly on CNN, on public television and on radio. Click here to contact him.

Support Noozhawk Today

You are an important ally in our mission to deliver clear, objective, high-quality professional news reporting for Santa Barbara, Goleta and the rest of Santa Barbara County. Join the Hawks Club today to help keep Noozhawk soaring.

We offer four membership levels: $5 a month, $10 a month, $25 a month or $1 a week. Payments can be made using a credit card, Apple Pay or Google Pay, or click here for information on recurring credit-card payments and a mailing address for checks.

Thank you for your vital support.

Become a Noozhawk Supporter

First name
Last name
Email
Select your monthly membership
Or choose an annual membership
×

Payment Information

Membership Subscription

You are enrolling in . Thank you for joining the Hawks Club.

Payment Method

Pay by Credit Card:

Mastercard, Visa, American Express, Discover
One click only, please!

Pay with Apple Pay or Google Pay:

Noozhawk partners with Stripe to provide secure invoicing and payments processing.
You may cancel your membership at any time by sending an email to .(JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address).

  • Ask
  • Vote
  • Investigate
  • Answer

Noozhawk Asks: What’s Your Question?

Welcome to Noozhawk Asks, a new feature in which you ask the questions, you help decide what Noozhawk investigates, and you work with us to find the answers.

Here’s how it works: You share your questions with us in the nearby box. In some cases, we may work with you to find the answers. In others, we may ask you to vote on your top choices to help us narrow the scope. And we’ll be regularly asking you for your feedback on a specific issue or topic.

We also expect to work together with the reader who asked the winning questions to find the answer together. Noozhawk’s objective is to come at questions from a place of curiosity and openness, and we believe a transparent collaboration is the key to achieve it.

The results of our investigation will be published here in this Noozhawk Asks section. Once or twice a month, we plan to do a review of what was asked and answered.

Thanks for asking!

Click Here to Get Started >

Reader Comments

Noozhawk is no longer accepting reader comments on our articles. Click here for the announcement. Readers are instead invited to submit letters to the editor by emailing them to [email protected]. Please provide your full name and community, as well as contact information for verification purposes only.