Monday, November 12 , 2018, 5:00 pm | Fair 72º

 
 
 

Harris Sherline: The Deficit Hits the Fan in California

Schwarzenegger continues to lead the state down a path of fiscal disaster

In an ironic turn of events, California — the nation’s worst financial scofflaw — may be about to take the lead in responding to the severe financial crises of its own making.

Harris Sherline
Harris Sherline

In a case of the pot calling the kettle black, Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger announced that he will seek “terrible cuts” to deal with a budget deficit in excess of $18 billion for the current fiscal year, which ends June 30. The cuts he has asked the Legislature to make include eliminating the state’s welfare program and significantly reducing in-home health care for the elderly and disabled. He also proposed dropping state-subsidized child care for all but preschool children.

After nearly eight years of saying one thing and doing another, Schwarzenegger finally appears to be about to get fiscal religion. While the Democratic-controlled Legislature is already floating proposals for raising taxes, the “Governator” is suddenly talking about “some really terrible cuts.”

Whatever the severity of Schwarzenegger’s recommendations, to his credit, one thing he did not propose was any increase in taxes. Well, I say, it’s about time! Where has he been for the past 7½ years?

Actually, he did cut taxes — at least one tax — immediately after taking office in 2003, when he rolled back the tripling of the car tax. Subsequently, however, it has been all downhill.

California’s politicos have been playing games with the state’s budget process for years, but it looks as though they won’t be able to avoid facing reality much longer, although there is little doubt that they will try. California’s fiscal rating is in the tank. The interest rate on new issues of the state’s bonds are threatening to rise into the stratosphere, and the potential of being unable to pay our bills looms large.

So, as we march into the eye of a financial storm, the Legislature is still trying to paper over California’s budget deficit, estimated at $18 billion to $20 billion. The state’s controller recently reported that California took in $1.3 billion less in taxes (through April) than predicted.

What else did Schwarzenegger do? He jumped on the bandwagon of the environmental naysayers and, almost immediately after the oil disaster in the Gulf of Mexico, he promptly cut off perhaps the one major potential source for generating enough revenue to bail California out by declaring all drilling off the coast verboten. At the same time, he has actively helped shepherd the state’s implementation of the disastrous AB 32, a law that will effect the owners of every truck in the state so severely that many of them will be forced to go.

What a guy. What a courageous politician.

For nine of the past 10 years, California’s spending has exceeded the state’s population growth and the rate of inflation, but Schwarzenegger has done next to nothing to try to hold the line, in spite of his ability to exercise the line-item veto. At the same time, the excessive regulatory environment he has helped create has been a major factor in inducing the flight of businesses from the state.

Schwarzenegger has done little or nothing to stem the tide of businesses leaving California, while other states, such as Colorado, Idaho and Nevada, have aggressively courted them with favorable tax treatment and financial aid. Jan Norman recently blogged that about 129 businesses have left California for greener pastures — taking their payrolls, investment capital and tax dollars with them. They are just the tip of the financial iceberg that threatens to sink California’s ship of state.

There’s only one way California’s unimpeded march into deficitland can end, and that’s in fiscal disaster. Why the people who have been in charge of running the state do not, cannot or are unwilling to face reality is a mystery. It’s obvious to me, much of the public and the responsible media outlets. Sadly, however, that doesn’t seem to phase those who won’t look, especially when Schwarzenegger sets the wrong example by failing to provide the leadership that’s needed.

I voted for Schwarzenegger, but at this point I can hardly wait for him to leave office. I only hope he doesn’t reappear somewhere else on the political scene, where we could be forced to continue tolerating his public presence.

My concern is that we could end up having to suffer through another four years of “Governor Moonbeam.” I’m not sure which would be worse, “Governor Moonbeam” or “The Governator.”

— Harris R. Sherline is a retired CPA and former chairman and CEO of Santa Ynez Valley Hospital who has lived in Santa Barbara County for more than 30 years. He stays active writing opinion columns and his blog, Opinionfest.com.

Support Noozhawk Today

You are an important ally in our mission to deliver clear, objective, high-quality professional news reporting for Santa Barbara, Goleta and the rest of Santa Barbara County. Join the Hawks Club today to help keep Noozhawk soaring.

We offer four membership levels: $5 a month, $10 a month, $25 a month or $1 a week. Payments can be made using a credit card, Apple Pay or Google Pay, or click here for information on recurring credit-card payments and a mailing address for checks.

Thank you for your vital support.

Become a Noozhawk Supporter

First name
Last name
Email
Select your monthly membership
Or choose an annual membership
×

Payment Information

Membership Subscription

You are enrolling in . Thank you for joining the Hawks Club.

Payment Method

Pay by Credit Card:

Mastercard, Visa, American Express, Discover
One click only, please!

Pay with Apple Pay or Google Pay:

Noozhawk partners with Stripe to provide secure invoicing and payments processing.
You may cancel your membership at any time by sending an email to .(JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address).

  • Ask
  • Vote
  • Investigate
  • Answer

Noozhawk Asks: What’s Your Question?

Welcome to Noozhawk Asks, a new feature in which you ask the questions, you help decide what Noozhawk investigates, and you work with us to find the answers.

Here’s how it works: You share your questions with us in the nearby box. In some cases, we may work with you to find the answers. In others, we may ask you to vote on your top choices to help us narrow the scope. And we’ll be regularly asking you for your feedback on a specific issue or topic.

We also expect to work together with the reader who asked the winning questions to find the answer together. Noozhawk’s objective is to come at questions from a place of curiosity and openness, and we believe a transparent collaboration is the key to achieve it.

The results of our investigation will be published here in this Noozhawk Asks section. Once or twice a month, we plan to do a review of what was asked and answered.

Thanks for asking!

Click Here to Get Started >

Reader Comments

Noozhawk is no longer accepting reader comments on our articles. Click here for the announcement. Readers are instead invited to submit letters to the editor by emailing them to [email protected]. Please provide your full name and community, as well as contact information for verification purposes only.