Tuesday, October 23 , 2018, 5:10 pm | Partly Cloudy 69º

 
 
 
 

David Harsanyi: What’s the Big Deal? Plenty

There has always been cronyism, but White House's job-for-dropout efforts went too far

For all of you anticipating an investigation into the Obama administration’s thriving jobs-for-dropouts program by the most ethical Congress in history, stop dreaming.

David Harsanyi
David Harsanyi

But let’s pose broader questions regarding the Andrew Romanoff and Joe Sestak affairs: Why is it illegal to offer a position for a favor in the first place? What’s the big deal? Happens all the time. After all, it’s not as if our vast government bureaucracies employ a strict merit-driven hiring process.

If they did, would Ken Salazar be deemed the most capable person in the nation to lead the Department of the Interior? Solar-powered platitudes, empty threats and a cowboy hat can get you so far. What could possibly be the reason for a union lackey like Hilda Solis running the Department of Labor? Labor in this case means actual jobs, right?

And sadly, I have more business managing the Transportation Department than Ray LaHood, who believes cars are immoral, planes are unsafe and bicycles hold the key to solving the nation’s congestion.

So we always have cronyism, patronage jobs and politics-in-lieu-of-experience jobs, but they come with some level of transparency: department heads vetted, executive branch nominating, voters with a clear idea of whom to blame.

It is not the same as proactively undermining the democratic process by trading taxpayer-funded jobs so that the president’s agenda isn’t inconvenienced — as if it were some regal privilege.

Yet there was White House spokesman Robert Gibbs this week, breezily explaining, “The president ... has an interest in ensuring that supporters don’t run against each other in contested primaries.”

Well, why didn’t you say that in the first place?

If the president has an interest in ensuring supporters aren’t infighting because it inconveniences him, well, please feel free to offer up government positions to clear the field in Colorado, Pennsylvania and Whereverelse and alleviate this anxiety.

Gibbs earlier confessed potential illegality — perhaps inadvertently — when he stated that White House Deputy Chief of Staff Jim Messina “called and e-mailed Romanoff last September to see if he was still interested in a position at USAID or if, as had been reported, he was running for the U.S. Senate. ... Messina wanted to determine if it was possible to avoid a costly battle between two supporters.”

(“Avoid a costly battle,” says the administration that has increased the U.S. debt load threefold since it’s taken over to $5 billion per day and spent a reported $658 million during the 2008 presidential election.)

The statute seems pretty clear in stating that any job offer made “directly or indirectly ... to any person as consideration, favor or reward for any political activity” is an illegal act. (Who knows? An e-mail featuring a smorgasbord of job choices should a certain somebody drop out of a certain race might be considered an “indirect” offer.)

Does the administration get to choose which laws it follows?

And no, this is not a question of competence. It is true that Sestak is the highest-ranking former military officer serving in Congress and probably would make a perfectly capable secretary of the Navy. Romanoff, once Colorado House speaker, was a capable legislator — or at least as capable as the administration-anointed Michael Bennet. Which also makes both men serious and legitimate Senate candidates.

Perhaps it’s a reflection of the hubris of this administration — or perhaps of its false sense of moral dominance over the debate — that it will admit to illegality (at worst) or a clear unethical transaction (at the very best).

No, this isn’t Watergate or Bribegate, and maybe this happens all the time, but let’s not downplay how sleazy it is.

David Harsanyi is a columnist at The Denver Post and the author of Nanny State. Click here for more information, or click here to contact him.

Support Noozhawk Today

You are an important ally in our mission to deliver clear, objective, high-quality professional news reporting for Santa Barbara, Goleta and the rest of Santa Barbara County. Join the Hawks Club today to help keep Noozhawk soaring.

We offer four membership levels: $5 a month, $10 a month, $25 a month or $1 a week. Payments can be made using a credit card, Apple Pay or Google Pay, or click here for information on recurring credit-card payments and a mailing address for checks.

Thank you for your vital support.

Become a Noozhawk Supporter

First name
Last name
Email
Select your monthly membership
Or choose an annual membership
×

Payment Information

Membership Subscription

You are enrolling in . Thank you for joining the Hawks Club.

Payment Method

Pay by Credit Card:

Mastercard, Visa, American Express, Discover
One click only, please!

Pay with Apple Pay or Google Pay:

Noozhawk partners with Stripe to provide secure invoicing and payments processing.
You may cancel your membership at any time by sending an email to .(JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address).

  • Ask
  • Vote
  • Investigate
  • Answer

Noozhawk Asks: What’s Your Question?

Welcome to Noozhawk Asks, a new feature in which you ask the questions, you help decide what Noozhawk investigates, and you work with us to find the answers.

Here’s how it works: You share your questions with us in the nearby box. In some cases, we may work with you to find the answers. In others, we may ask you to vote on your top choices to help us narrow the scope. And we’ll be regularly asking you for your feedback on a specific issue or topic.

We also expect to work together with the reader who asked the winning questions to find the answer together. Noozhawk’s objective is to come at questions from a place of curiosity and openness, and we believe a transparent collaboration is the key to achieve it.

The results of our investigation will be published here in this Noozhawk Asks section. Once or twice a month, we plan to do a review of what was asked and answered.

Thanks for asking!

Click Here to Get Started >

Reader Comments

Noozhawk is no longer accepting reader comments on our articles. Click here for the announcement. Readers are instead invited to submit letters to the editor by emailing them to [email protected]. Please provide your full name and community, as well as contact information for verification purposes only.