Pixel Tracker

Friday, December 14 , 2018, 7:41 am | Mostly Cloudy 48º


Harris Sherline: The Man Without a Country

Americans who plot against our nation and its people should be stripped of their citizenship

What should be done about U.S. citizens who turn against their own country by deliberately acting to hurt other Americans or attempting to destroy buildings and other property? Do they deserve the continued protections of the Constitution? For example, should they be entitled to Miranda rights when they attack the United States or its citizens or openly declare their allegiance to another country or group, such as al-Qaeda?

Harris Sherline
Harris Sherline

Sen. Joseph Lieberman, I-Conn., doesn’t think so and has introduced a bill that would enable the government to strip them of their citizenship, reasoning that a 1940 law makes it possible for the State Department to withdraw the citizenship of people who join the armed forces of an enemy.

Lieberman has the right idea.

Whatever the difficulties may be of further refining the existing law, it would be worth the trouble. There have already been numerous instances in which U.S. citizens have either joined forces with our enemies, such as al-Qaeda, and should be stripped of their citizenship. American citizenship may be a right of birth or naturalization, but it shouldn’t be without limits. It’s also a privilege and carries — or should carry — certain obligations. I don’t believe people should be able to enjoy all the benefits of U.S. citizenship while, at the same time, they actively plot against the security of this nation and its people.

For example, Adam Gadahn, who was born in the United States, has become the spokesman for al-Qaeda, which is actively seeking the destruction of the United States. Other Americans have been fighting for al-Shabab, or have joined our enemies in Somalia and, of course, there is the notorious case of Maj. Nidal Malik Hasan, who is charged with killing 13 soldiers and wounded 30 others at a Fort Hood, Texas, processing center in 2009. Based on the fact that he allegedly shouted “Allahu Akbar” (“God is greatest”) as he opened fire, it is believed he was declaring his allegiance to Islam while attacking U.S. soldiers he believed were being processed for deployment to Iraq and Afghanistan to fight against his fellow Muslims in those countries.

The recent Times Square incident in Manhattan is another instance in which a naturalized U.S. citizen, this time from Pakistan, Faisal Shahzad, allegedly attempted to kill Americans in the cause of our enemies. Shahzad was immediately given his Miranda rights, which may have limited the ability of authorities to obtain information from him, although it is clear that he is linked to the Taliban in Pakistan.

The idea of stripping U.S. citizenship from an American who openly repudiates his country was graphically portrayed in the novel The Man Without a Country, written by Everett Hale in 1863. The story depicts an Army lieutenant, Philip Nolan, who renounces his country in the 1800s during a trial for treason. Nolan is subsequently sentenced to spend the rest of his life at sea without ever hearing any news or information about the United States.

This allegorical story describes how Nolan ultimately learns the “true worth” of his country, realizing that without it, “he is nothing.” Hale’s story was so skillfully told that many readers believed it was true. It was one of the most effective pieces of patriotic literature ever written about America, and it’s particularly pertinent to the discussion about Lieberman’s proposal that we withdraw citizenship from Americans who openly attack the United States or declare their allegiance to other nations or groups that attack us, such as the Taliban or al-Qaeda.

Although the alleged would-be Times Square bomber, Shahzad, is a naturalized U.S. citizen, considering the nature of his actions I don’t believe he should be entitled to the protections afforded by our Constitution, especially if it’s determined that he became a U.S. citizen specifically for the purpose of attacking our homeland.

The State Department should take steps to strip him of his citizenship, and he should be tried in a military tribunal as an enemy combatant.

— Harris R. Sherline is a retired CPA and former chairman and CEO of Santa Ynez Valley Hospital who has lived in Santa Barbara County for more than 30 years. He stays active writing opinion columns and his blog, Opinionfest.com.

Support Noozhawk Today

You are an important ally in our mission to deliver clear, objective, high-quality professional news reporting for Santa Barbara, Goleta and the rest of Santa Barbara County. Join the Hawks Club today to help keep Noozhawk soaring.

We offer four membership levels: $5 a month, $10 a month, $25 a month or $1 a week. Payments can be made using a credit card, Apple Pay or Google Pay, or click here for information on recurring credit-card payments and a mailing address for checks.

Thank you for your vital support.

Become a Noozhawk Supporter

First name
Last name
Select your monthly membership
Or choose an annual membership

Payment Information

Membership Subscription

You are enrolling in . Thank you for joining the Hawks Club.

Payment Method

Pay by Credit Card:

Mastercard, Visa, American Express, Discover
One click only, please!

Pay with Apple Pay or Google Pay:

Noozhawk partners with Stripe to provide secure invoicing and payments processing.
You may cancel your membership at any time by sending an email to .(JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address).

  • Ask
  • Vote
  • Investigate
  • Answer

Noozhawk Asks: What’s Your Question?

Welcome to Noozhawk Asks, a new feature in which you ask the questions, you help decide what Noozhawk investigates, and you work with us to find the answers.

Here’s how it works: You share your questions with us in the nearby box. In some cases, we may work with you to find the answers. In others, we may ask you to vote on your top choices to help us narrow the scope. And we’ll be regularly asking you for your feedback on a specific issue or topic.

We also expect to work together with the reader who asked the winning questions to find the answer together. Noozhawk’s objective is to come at questions from a place of curiosity and openness, and we believe a transparent collaboration is the key to achieve it.

The results of our investigation will be published here in this Noozhawk Asks section. Once or twice a month, we plan to do a review of what was asked and answered.

Thanks for asking!

Click Here to Get Started >

Reader Comments

Noozhawk is no longer accepting reader comments on our articles. Click here for the announcement. Readers are instead invited to submit letters to the editor by emailing them to [email protected]. Please provide your full name and community, as well as contact information for verification purposes only.