Sunday, February 25 , 2018, 11:30 am | Fair 60º


Mark Cromer: Sliding Into the Sea

Thanks to fed-up voters, California’s reckoning is at hand. It's still not clear that political leaders get the message

In the aftermath of one of the angriest voter rebukes of government in modern California history, the bipartisan shellshock that remains on display in Sacramento does not auger well for the state’s ability to pull out of its fiscal death spiral.

Mark Cromer
Mark Cromer

The series of ballot initiatives that were pitched by Republican Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger and the Democratic Legislature as the last chance to avoid a budgetary Armageddon evaporated amid a mushroom cloud of voter disgust. Ash was still in the air as legislators staggered around muttering bitterly about “the voters,” like parents who had reached the end of their patience with their special-needs child.

John Burton, chairman of the California Democratic Party, angrily declared that the election demonstrated Californians want government services without having to pay for them.

“People are going to have to figure out: Do they want schools, do they want roads, do they want public safety, do they want to take care of the less fortunate?” Burton said. “At some point, that’s going to happen.”

The establishment media has since crackled with analysis that fundamentally echoed Burton’s dismissive retort to the voter backlash, accusing Californians of electoral schizophrenia by demanding expensive services in flush times, then railing like a mob of misers when the well runs dry and they discover there are no reserves.

Their interpretation signals, in very real terms, that the professional politicians in Sacramento have now lost all touch with the middle-class voter in California. Burton’s surreal comments highlight the volatile disconnect between the state capital and Main Street.

California’s voters indeed want good schools, paved roads, cops on the beat, firefighters on watch and a safety net for fellow citizens — and they have long paid some of the highest taxes in the nation to ensure those services.

The trouble for Sacramento is the return they’ve delivered on taxpayers’ investment.

Voters see public school districts that are overwhelmed and failing; infrastructure that is crumbling; police and fire services that are pushed to the breaking point by violent gangs and wildfires; and a social safety net that has been converted into a de facto welfare subsidy for millions of illegal immigrants.

The Los Angeles Unified School District is a smoldering testament to the mediocrity and malfeasance that has spread across California, where tens of billions of tax dollars have been thrown into capital investments and instruction throughout the sprawling school district, only to produce a 50-percent dropout rate and functionally illiterate graduates. The district’s 2008 Academic Performance Index (API) score is 681, not even close to the goal of 800 set by Sacramento. And that score is significantly lower among the vast majority of the district’s 700,000 students.

One major newspaper headline warned after the election that 19,000 illegal immigrant prisoners will be released into federal custody as a result of budget cuts — as if that is some sort of dire consequence. The irony is that most Californians would like to see those illegal immigrants — and millions of others in the state — taken into federal custody and deported back to their home countries.

A sweeping majority of California’s voters have simply decided they have had enough. Dire warnings from Sacramento of “brutal cuts” looming for the budget are meaningless in such a dysfunctional environment.

While some in the media pretend that the message voters sent is either muddled or contradictory, the fact is it couldn’t be more clear: voters would rather pay less for the failure they now assume will result regardless of how much government spends.

Californians have lost virtually all confidence in our state government’s desire and ability to restore accountability and produce meaningful results.

It’s a verdict that has plunged political elites in Sacramento and their cohorts in the establishment media into the five stages of grief: denial, anger and bargaining are the first to come, followed by depression.

And finally, acceptance.

Sooner or later Sacramento must accept that the long party is over. Our leaders must acknowledge that dramatic budget cuts have to be followed by a sober reassessment of our state’s population growth and the revenue schemes and wild spending it has indulged to accommodate that growth.

At long last, California is sliding into the sea.

The question now is: does it remember how to swim?

— Mark Cromer is a senior writing fellow at Californians for Population Stabilization.

  • Ask
  • Vote
  • Investigate
  • Answer

Noozhawk Asks: What’s Your Question?

Welcome to Noozhawk Asks, a new feature in which you ask the questions, you help decide what Noozhawk investigates, and you work with us to find the answers.

Here’s how it works: You share your questions with us in the nearby box. In some cases, we may work with you to find the answers. In others, we may ask you to vote on your top choices to help us narrow the scope. And we’ll be regularly asking you for your feedback on a specific issue or topic.

We also expect to work together with the reader who asked the winning questions to find the answer together. Noozhawk’s objective is to come at questions from a place of curiosity and openness, and we believe a transparent collaboration is the key to achieve it.

The results of our investigation will be published here in this Noozhawk Asks section. Once or twice a month, we plan to do a review of what was asked and answered.

Thanks for asking!

Click here to get started >

Support Noozhawk Today

You are an important ally in our mission to deliver clear, objective, high-quality professional news reporting for Santa Barbara, Goleta and the rest of Santa Barbara County. Join the Hawks Club today to help keep Noozhawk soaring.

We offer four membership levels: $5 a month, $10 a month, $25 a month or $1 a week. Payments can be made through PayPal below, or click here for information on recurring credit-card payments.

Thank you for your vital support.

Reader Comments

Noozhawk is no longer accepting reader comments on our articles. Click here for the announcement. Readers are instead invited to submit letters to the editor by emailing them to [email protected]. Please provide your full name and community, as well as contact information for verification purposes only.

Daily Noozhawk

Subscribe to Noozhawk's A.M. Report, our free e-Bulletin sent out every day at 4:15 a.m. with Noozhawk's top stories, hand-picked by the editors.

Sign Up Now >