Thursday, May 24 , 2018, 3:45 pm | Overcast 61º


Captain’s Log: Fishing an End to the End of Whaling

Lifting 24-year moratorium an ill-advised approach to controlling commercial hunting

A reader asked for my opinion on the movement within the International Whaling Commission — championed by the Obama administration — to end the 24-year moratorium on commercial whaling to the benefit of three countries (Japan, Norway and Iceland) that still hunt whales.

Capt. David Bacon
Capt. David Bacon (Ramona Lisa McFadyen photo)

I am against ending the moratorium at this time. My reasoning is not because whales are so adorable (which they are) or because they are vulnerable (which they may be). I do believe in managing species for healthy abundance and sustainability. We humans are in the whale management phase of striving to bring them back to abundance.

I see no need to reinstate commercial hunting until the population of whales becomes so big that ecosystems are paying too great a price to sustain them. At that point, I believe we need to carefully manage the population. I suspect we are already at a point of needing to look at managing the population of California sea lions (also adorable and vulnerable), but we are a long way yet to being at that point for any species of whale.

Countries using loopholes in the moratorium to continue commercially exploiting whales under the guise of science but whose underlying purpose is the commercial sale of whale meat and parts are obviously going against the wishes and intentions of the 88-member International Whaling Commission.

The intention of ending the moratorium is not necessarily to allow and endorse commercial hunting, but to limit and control it. Limits and controls don’t seem to work, however, when it is being done through legal loopholes. So I do appreciate that the plan is a strategy to implement controls over the practice, but I believe it’s an ill-advised approach that may lead to other countries — that may or may not be members of the commission — sharpening their harpoons and refitting hunting vessels.

My advice is to hit whale-hunting countries where it hurts — in their pocketbooks. I believe that the member countries involved in the International Whaling Commission should impose strict economic sanctions against those few countries. I’m thinking that if our next ballot were to have a measure on it asking whether we wish to place economic sanctions against countries that hunt whales commercially, the vote would tally overwhelmingly in favor of sanctions. We do love our whales.

But then if we do that, the next ballot might contain something similar about some critter that may actually be in need of management (maybe California sea lions), but voters are influenced by the adorable and vulnerable factors rather than the importance of carefully managed ecosystems and populations. At that point, we might find ourselves on a slippery slope of management by popularity.

That’s a whale of a problem for political columnists to ponder. Me, I’m casting off to go wave at whales on our Santa Barbara Channel. Want to come along?

— Capt. David Bacon operates WaveWalker Charters and is president of SOFTIN Inc., a nonprofit organization providing seafaring opportunities for those in need. Visit to learn more about the organization and how you can help.

Support Noozhawk Today

You are an important ally in our mission to deliver clear, objective, high-quality professional news reporting for Santa Barbara, Goleta and the rest of Santa Barbara County. Join the Hawks Club today to help keep Noozhawk soaring.

We offer four membership levels: $5 a month, $10 a month, $25 a month or $1 a week. Payments can be made through PayPal below, or click here for information on recurring credit-card payments.

Thank you for your vital support.

Become a Supporter

Enter your email
Select your membership level

Payment Information

You are purchasing:

Payment Method

Pay by Credit Card:

Mastercard, Visa, American Express, Discover

Pay with Apple Pay or Google Pay:

Noozhawk partners with Stripe to provide secure invoicing and payments processing.

  • Ask
  • Vote
  • Investigate
  • Answer

Noozhawk Asks: What’s Your Question?

Welcome to Noozhawk Asks, a new feature in which you ask the questions, you help decide what Noozhawk investigates, and you work with us to find the answers.

Here’s how it works: You share your questions with us in the nearby box. In some cases, we may work with you to find the answers. In others, we may ask you to vote on your top choices to help us narrow the scope. And we’ll be regularly asking you for your feedback on a specific issue or topic.

We also expect to work together with the reader who asked the winning questions to find the answer together. Noozhawk’s objective is to come at questions from a place of curiosity and openness, and we believe a transparent collaboration is the key to achieve it.

The results of our investigation will be published here in this Noozhawk Asks section. Once or twice a month, we plan to do a review of what was asked and answered.

Thanks for asking!

Click Here to Get Started >

Reader Comments

Noozhawk is no longer accepting reader comments on our articles. Click here for the announcement. Readers are instead invited to submit letters to the editor by emailing them to [email protected]. Please provide your full name and community, as well as contact information for verification purposes only.

Daily Noozhawk

Subscribe to Noozhawk's A.M. Report, our free e-Bulletin sent out every day at 4:15 a.m. with Noozhawk's top stories, hand-picked by the editors.

Sign Up Now >