Pixel Tracker

Monday, March 18 , 2019, 5:54 pm | Fair 65º


A Brief History of the Lambeth Conference, Part II

For more than 100 years, the Anglican Communion has been talking through issues in search of resolution. Second in a series.

[Editor’s note: This is the second in a series on the Lambeth Conference, the Anglican Communion’s assembly of bishops, which is held roughly every 10 years at the invitation of the Archbishop of Canterbury. Click here for the first installment, click here for the third installment and click here for the final installment.]

When the Lambeth Conference met in 1908 the bishops were entering a new century and facing new issues. Their focus in 16 resolutions was, appropriately, on education and training both for ministry and lay people. There was a greater interest as well in ecumenical relationships, especially with the Orthodox, the Old Catholic Churches, and the Presbyterians. The conference condemned the opium trade and deplored the growing “disregard of the sanctity of marriage.” Those who were divorced, they said, could not be remarried in the church, although the “innocent party” might be readmitted to communion after a civil marriage. Birth control and abortion were condemned.

Rev. Christopher L. Webber (Webber family photo)

Ironically, the bishops, while “frankly acknowledging the moral gains sometimes won by war,” rejoiced in the “increasing willingness to settle difficulties among nations by peaceful methods.” The outbreak of World War I caused the postponement of their next meeting.

Meeting in 1920, the bishops had nothing to say about any “moral gains” that might have been won but did commend the League of Nations to the people of the world. Americans rejected that advice. The most revolutionary statement they made was to advise that women — who had just been given the right to vote in America — could be admitted to any office in which a layman might serve. It took nearly 50 years for the American church to catch up with that and allow women to serve on vestries and as deputies to General Convention. In a more conservative mood, they continued to condemn birth control and linked it with prostitution in calling on governments to end “the open or secret sale of contraceptives, and the continued existence of brothels.”

Women’s ministry was a major concern, but the restoration of the order of deaconesses was all they could recommend.

By 1930, the bishops were beginning to have second thoughts about birth control. The 1662 Prayer Book, still the standard throughout the British empire, said that the procreation of children was the primary purpose of marriage, but if parents were not enthusiastic about large families, the bishops called for “deliberate and thoughtful self-control ... in intercourse” and possibly, where there were morally sound reasons, ‘other methods,” but not “for selfishness or mere convenience.”

It was 18 years until the bishops could meet again and, when they did, in 1948, recovery from the war was very much on their minds. They reaffirmed a 1930 resolution “that war as a method of settling international disputes is incompatible with the teaching and example of our Lord Jesus Christ.” Inspired perhaps by the recently created United Nations, they provided a definition of the Anglican Communion as “a fellowship, within the one Holy Catholic and Apostolic Church ...  bound together not by a central legislative and executive authority, but by mutual loyalty sustained through the common counsel of the bishops in conference.”

The bishops were concerned to hold up a different way of life to a war-torn world. The first eight resolutions concerned “the Christian Doctrine of Man” and human rights. The bishops affirmed “that man has a spiritual as well as a material nature, and that he can attain full stature only as he recognizes and yields to the love of God as revealed in Jesus Christ and to the influence of his Holy Spirit.”

On the subject of marriage, the bishops could do little more than repeat themselves. They noted with sadness “the great increase in the number of broken marriages and the tragedy of children deprived of true home life,” “affirm(ed) that marriage always entails a lifelong union and obligation,” and called on “members of the Church and others to do their utmost by word and example to uphold the sanctity of the marriage bond and to counteract those influences which tend to destroy it.” Yet divorced people could not be remarried in the church and if remarried in a civil service and wishing to receive communion, the case should be referred to the bishop.

Not until 1958 would the bishops begin to construct a positive theology of marriage, but then they would be facing still more complex issues.

The Rev. Christopher L. Webber is an Episcopal priest living in Connecticut. He is the author of numerous books, including, most recently, Beyond Beowulf, the first-ever sequel to Beowulf, and A Year with American Saints. An American Prayer Book is scheduled for August publication.

Support Noozhawk Today!

Our professional journalists work tirelessly to report on local news so you can be more informed and engaged in your community. This quality, local reporting is free for you to read and share, but it's not free to produce.

You count on us to deliver timely, relevant local news, 24/7. Can we count on you to invest in our newsroom and help secure its future?

We provide special member benefits to show how much we appreciate your support.

I would like give...
Great! You're joining as a Red-Tailed Hawk!
  • Ask
  • Vote
  • Investigate
  • Answer

Noozhawk Asks: What’s Your Question?

Welcome to Noozhawk Asks, a new feature in which you ask the questions, you help decide what Noozhawk investigates, and you work with us to find the answers.

Here’s how it works: You share your questions with us in the nearby box. In some cases, we may work with you to find the answers. In others, we may ask you to vote on your top choices to help us narrow the scope. And we’ll be regularly asking you for your feedback on a specific issue or topic.

We also expect to work together with the reader who asked the winning questions to find the answer together. Noozhawk’s objective is to come at questions from a place of curiosity and openness, and we believe a transparent collaboration is the key to achieve it.

The results of our investigation will be published here in this Noozhawk Asks section. Once or twice a month, we plan to do a review of what was asked and answered.

Thanks for asking!

Click Here to Get Started >

Reader Comments

Noozhawk is no longer accepting reader comments on our articles. Click here for the announcement. Readers are instead invited to submit letters to the editor by emailing them to [email protected]. Please provide your full name and community, as well as contact information for verification purposes only.