Tuesday, October 16 , 2018, 12:44 pm | Fair 77º

 
 
 
 

DA Says Shooting of Santa Maria Officer Was Justified

Albert Covarrubias Jr. was killed by fellow officer as investigators were trying to arrest him for allegedly having sex with 17-year-old girl

The fatal shooting of Santa Maria police Officer Albert Covarrubias Jr. by a fellow officer earlier this year was ruled a justifiable homicide Tuesday afternoon by Santa Barbara County District Attorney Joyce Dudley.

Covarrubius, 29, was shot in the early morning hours of Jan. 28, as two supervisors in the Santa Maria Police Department attempted to arrest him for allegedly having a sexual relationship with a 17-year-old member of the department’s Police Explorers program.

Three rounds from a .45-caliber Glock semi-automatic handgun fired by Officer Matthew Kline struck Covarrubias, according to an 18-page report released by Dudley. A later autopsy determined that Covarrubias died from a shot that struck him in the neck, the report indicated.

(See Dudley’s full report at the bottom of this story.)

The shooting happened as Covarrubias was among a group of officers who were breaking down a DUI checkpoint at McElhany Avenue and Broadway at about 1:20 a.m., when Sgt. Chris Nartatez and Sgt. Mark Norling attempted to take him into custody.

“Sgt. Nartatez and Sgt. Norling walked direclty toward Officer Covarrubias,” according to Dudley’s report. “As they did so, Officer Covarrubias backed away from them. Sgt. Nartatez reached toward Officer Covarrubias. As Sgt. Nartatez grabbed for him, Officer Covarrubias pulled his gun out.”

As Nartatez struggled to control Covarrubias, the report states, Covarrubias fired a single shot, which did not hit anyone. In the ensuing struggle, as Nartatez tried to disarm Covarrubias, Kline move in closer to the battling men.

“Sgt. Nartatez was on top of Officer Covarrubias and continued to yell for help,” according to the report. “It appeared to Officer Kline that Sgt. Norling was in the vicinity of where the firearm was being pointed. Officer Kline moved in and fired three rounds.”

“Officer Kline, a friend of Officer Covarrubias, saw a life-threatening situation unfold in front of him,” Dudley wrote in her report. “Fearing for the safety of others, and believing he needed to act immediately to preserve the sergeants’ lives, he shot and killed Officer Covarrubias.”

Covarrubias was declared dead on arrival at Marian Medical Center in Santa Maria.

The investigation of the officer-involved shooting was conducted by the Santa Barbara County Sheriff’s Department, which turned over its findings to Dudley’s office in early May.

The department’s handling of the investigation into Covarrubius’ alleged relationship with the teen — and the way in which they attempted to arrest him — have come under scrutiny in the city of Santa Maria.

Police had been tipped off to the alleged relationship by a friend of the victim earlier in the week, according to Santa Maria Police Chief Danny Macagni, and interviewed the teen in the presence of her parents the evening of Jan. 27. She had been present at the DUI checkpoint, but had been called home on the pretext of a family emergency.

As part of their investigation, investigators had the victim phone Covarrubias less than an hour before he was killed, according to Dudley’s report. In the course of this “pretext call,” Covarrubias allegedly admitted having sexual contact with the teen, expressed suspicion that the call was a set-up, and asked her not to tell anyone about it, according to the report.

He also said words to the effect that “I’m not going to be taken in. I’m going to kill myself,” according to the report.

At that point, the decision was made to go to the DUI checkpoint and arrest Covarrubias, the report said.

Dudley’s report goes into great detail about the series of events that led to Covarrubias’ death, recounting in chronological order how the investigation unfolded, which officers were involved, and who in the police leadership was making the decisions at various points. Conspicuously absent was any indication of what Macagni’s role was as chief of police; his name is never mentioned in the report.

Asked late Tuesday what involvement Macagni had in the decisions that were made, Dudley said, “I don’t know.”

Reached Tuesday afternoon, Macagni said he could not comment on Dudley’s findings, pending the completion of an independent investigation ordered by the city. He referred all questions to City Manager Rick Haydon, who issued a statement noting that “the city intends to continue its investigation into this incident and include this information in the ongoing administrative review currently being conducted by outside independent investigators.”

Haydon urged the public to be patient while this process continues, and said city officials are “precluded from making any further comments at this time.”

Noozhawk executive editor Tom Bolton can be reached at .(JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address). Follow Noozhawk on Twitter: @noozhawk, @NoozhawkNews and @NoozhawkBiz. Connect with Noozhawk on Facebook.

Covarrubias Shooting Reports Bcd A

 

Support Noozhawk Today

You are an important ally in our mission to deliver clear, objective, high-quality professional news reporting for Santa Barbara, Goleta and the rest of Santa Barbara County. Join the Hawks Club today to help keep Noozhawk soaring.

We offer four membership levels: $5 a month, $10 a month, $25 a month or $1 a week. Payments can be made using a credit card, Apple Pay or Google Pay, or click here for information on recurring credit-card payments and a mailing address for checks.

Thank you for your vital support.

Become a Noozhawk Supporter

First name
Last name
Email
Select your monthly membership
Or choose an annual membership
×

Payment Information

Membership Subscription

You are enrolling in . Thank you for joining the Hawks Club.

Payment Method

Pay by Credit Card:

Mastercard, Visa, American Express, Discover
One click only, please!

Pay with Apple Pay or Google Pay:

Noozhawk partners with Stripe to provide secure invoicing and payments processing.
You may cancel your membership at any time by sending an email to .(JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address).

  • Ask
  • Vote
  • Investigate
  • Answer

Noozhawk Asks: What’s Your Question?

Welcome to Noozhawk Asks, a new feature in which you ask the questions, you help decide what Noozhawk investigates, and you work with us to find the answers.

Here’s how it works: You share your questions with us in the nearby box. In some cases, we may work with you to find the answers. In others, we may ask you to vote on your top choices to help us narrow the scope. And we’ll be regularly asking you for your feedback on a specific issue or topic.

We also expect to work together with the reader who asked the winning questions to find the answer together. Noozhawk’s objective is to come at questions from a place of curiosity and openness, and we believe a transparent collaboration is the key to achieve it.

The results of our investigation will be published here in this Noozhawk Asks section. Once or twice a month, we plan to do a review of what was asked and answered.

Thanks for asking!

Click Here to Get Started >

Reader Comments

Noozhawk is no longer accepting reader comments on our articles. Click here for the announcement. Readers are instead invited to submit letters to the editor by emailing them to [email protected]. Please provide your full name and community, as well as contact information for verification purposes only.

Daily Noozhawk

Subscribe to Noozhawk's A.M. Report, our free e-Bulletin sent out every day at 4:15 a.m. with Noozhawk's top stories, hand-picked by the editors.

Sign Up Now >