Friday, May 25 , 2018, 9:38 am | Mostly Cloudy 63º

 
 
 
 

Local News

A Brief History of the Lambeth Conference, Part III

For more than 100 years, the Anglican Communion has been talking through issues in search of resolution. Third in a series.

[Editor’s note: This is the third in a series on the Lambeth Conference, the Anglican Communion’s assembly of bishops, which is held roughly every 10 years at the invitation of the Archbishop of Canterbury. Click here for the first installment and click here for the second installment.]

The 1950s are sometimes remembered as a time of peace. In fact they were the years of the Korean War, the McCarthy hearings and the U.S. Supreme Court’s decision outlawing school segregation. Nonetheless, the Lambeth Conference of 1958 may have been the fulfillment of the early vision of what such meetings could be. The conference adopted 131 resolutions, carefully organized under eight headings beginning with the Bible and ending with 20 resolutions on “the Family in Contemporary Society.”

image
Rev. Christopher L. Webber (Webber family photo)

The bishops had adopted statements about marriage at almost every conference but now they attempted to construct a complete theology of marriage and family with a very positive perspective. Marriage, they said, is a “vocation to holiness” and the idea of the family is “rooted in the Godhead.”

“Consequently, the bishops agreed, “all problems of sex relations, the procreation of children, and the organization of family life must be related, consciously and directly, to the creative, redemptive, and sanctifying power of God.” Concentrating as they were on the family, the bishops had little to say about women’s ministry outside the home except to say that “fuller use should be made of trained and qualified women, and that spheres of progressive responsibility and greater security should be planned for them.”

To say, as they now did, that “Family planning is a right and important factor in Christian family life” is to admit either that they had been wrong in 1920 or that the times had changed — perhaps both were true. It was the first of several issues on which the bishops would reverse earlier stands in the last half of the 20th century.

When the conference convened in 1968, Pope Paul VI had just issued his statement condemning birth control. The Lambeth bishops said they could not “agree with the pope’s conclusion that all methods of conception control other than abstinence ... are contrary to the ‘order established by God.’” Of course, this meant the Lambeth bishops had been wrong themselves in 1920, but Anglican bishops have the right to be wrong.

Many of the bishops felt they had also been wrong on the subject of women’s ordination but the conference could only say that “the theological arguments as at present presented for and against the ordination of women to the priesthood are inconclusive.”

If the bishops were unwilling to exercise leadership, however, they were now willing to share it. The 1968 conference called for creation of a Consultative Council including approximately equal numbers of clergy — both bishops and priests — representing the member churches. The council would have authority only to study, coordinate and advise. A Communion that had been held together by “mutual affection,” a Prayer Book tradition, and occasional meetings of bishops would now have a representative body meeting every two years. Communion would be expressed through a committee.

None of that, of course, dealt helpfully with the question of the ordination of women. Thus, when the bishops convened in 1978 they found that the world had moved on without them. Women had already been ordained in the United States, Canada, New Zealand and Hong Kong. The bishops acknowledged “that both the debate about the ordination of women as well as the ordinations themselves have ... caused distress and pain to many on both sides.” They felt that their role was primarily pastoral: “To heal ... and to maintain and strengthen fellowship.” They pleaded for patience and sensitivity and suggested the possible provision of alternative ministry for those unwilling to accept women as priests and bishops.

Other, even more painful issues, were already looming on the horizon. There was a need, the bishops, believed “for deep and dispassionate study of the question of homosexuality, which would take seriously both the teaching of Scripture and the results of scientific and medical research.” Unfortunately, there were few churches that responded to the Lambeth resolution and the bishops were no more ready to deal with the subject in 1988 than they had been 10 years earlier.

The Rev. Christopher L. Webber is an Episcopal priest living in Connecticut. He is the author of numerous books, including, most recently, Beyond Beowulf, the first-ever sequel to Beowulf, and A Year with American Saints. An American Prayer Book is scheduled for August publication.

Support Noozhawk Today

You are an important ally in our mission to deliver clear, objective, high-quality professional news reporting for Santa Barbara, Goleta and the rest of Santa Barbara County. Join the Hawks Club today to help keep Noozhawk soaring.

We offer four membership levels: $5 a month, $10 a month, $25 a month or $1 a week. Payments can be made through PayPal below, or click here for information on recurring credit-card payments.

Thank you for your vital support.

Become a Supporter

Enter your email
Select your membership level
×

Payment Information

You are purchasing:

Payment Method

Pay by Credit Card:

Mastercard, Visa, American Express, Discover

Pay with Apple Pay or Google Pay:

Noozhawk partners with Stripe to provide secure invoicing and payments processing.

  • Ask
  • Vote
  • Investigate
  • Answer

Noozhawk Asks: What’s Your Question?

Welcome to Noozhawk Asks, a new feature in which you ask the questions, you help decide what Noozhawk investigates, and you work with us to find the answers.

Here’s how it works: You share your questions with us in the nearby box. In some cases, we may work with you to find the answers. In others, we may ask you to vote on your top choices to help us narrow the scope. And we’ll be regularly asking you for your feedback on a specific issue or topic.

We also expect to work together with the reader who asked the winning questions to find the answer together. Noozhawk’s objective is to come at questions from a place of curiosity and openness, and we believe a transparent collaboration is the key to achieve it.

The results of our investigation will be published here in this Noozhawk Asks section. Once or twice a month, we plan to do a review of what was asked and answered.

Thanks for asking!

Click Here to Get Started >

Reader Comments

Noozhawk is no longer accepting reader comments on our articles. Click here for the announcement. Readers are instead invited to submit letters to the editor by emailing them to [email protected]. Please provide your full name and community, as well as contact information for verification purposes only.

Daily Noozhawk

Subscribe to Noozhawk's A.M. Report, our free e-Bulletin sent out every day at 4:15 a.m. with Noozhawk's top stories, hand-picked by the editors.

Sign Up Now >