Pixel Tracker

Monday, March 18 , 2019, 5:30 pm | Fair 65º

 
 
 
 

Commentary: The Santa Barbara Museum of Natural History and Politics

While it is not sponsoring Tuesday's McCain event, the venue is worthy of the discussion of the environment.

On Tuesday, the Republican presidential campaign of Sen. John McCain will be at the Santa Barbara Museum of Natural History to hold a panel discussion on the environment. A number of members of our community are startled that the museum would provide its space for a political event, and some are dismayed at what they see as an abuse of the museum venue for partisan political purposes. Why would the museum allow that?

First, let me clarify: The museum is not hosting or sponsoring the event. Rather, we were approached by the McCain campaign with a request to rent our facility for a panel discussion focused on the environment. Since Fleischmann Auditorium was available for the specified time and date, we agreed. The McCain campaign is paying standard rental rates and is covering all incidental expenses.

However, while the museum did not organize or sponsor the event, we were nevertheless extremely pleased that Sen. McCain and his campaign leaders thought that the Museum of Natural History was the appropriate venue for a discussion of the environment. Here is why.

“Natural history” is an old-fashioned term for nature and the environment. For more than 90 years, the Museum of Natural History has been in the business of studying, interpreting and teaching about the environment. Today, the urgency of our work is greatly increased by the grave predicament we find ourselves in at the beginning of the 21st century.

With well more than 6.5 billion people inhabiting our globe, the human population has ballooned to a size where we have literally begun to “eat our planet.” Many of the most important natural resources that used to be for the taking (water, forests and fish) have declined to critical levels. We have begun to wonder whether we can develop alternative sources of energy quickly enough to substitute for the declining reserves of oil. Global agricultural production is struggling to keep up with the booming demand for food and industrial raw materials. We have polluted our planet’s air, water and soils to a shocking degree; the teeming diversity of life itself is declining; even the most hardened doubters have begun to accept that global climate change, caused by human action, is an imminent threat to our well-being.

It is not just our generation that faces a gargantuan challenge. If we don’t find solutions, the threat will be even graver for our children and grandchildren. There is no question that we need to pull together, use all of our energies and apply all of our ingenuity to find solutions to the huge issues that confront us. This is perhaps the greatest challenge of all – pulling together as a community – as this is possibly the one thing we are least prepared to do.

Our social fabric has become deeply rent by a pervasive culture of polarization and divisiveness. We seem to be unable or unwilling to listen to divergent views, and we are certainly unwilling to negotiate compromises in which everybody gives a little, nobody gets all they want, but the common good can thrive. Yet, it is this search for common ground that provides the only viable mechanism for developing solutions for the confounding problems we face. We need to accept the fact that nobody has exclusive ownership of the truth but that we can find it only, if we come together and earnestly and honestly search for it in an unconditional dialog.

This is our museum’s other great goal: “to connect our diverse communities” in order to help repair our tattered social fabric and to bring people together so that they can discover common ground and common interest in the midst of all divisions. There are so few institutions nowadays that do that. Even our churches and religions seem to divide us, let alone race, language, ethnicity, social status, income level and political persuasion. It is our ambition for the museum to be “a safe place to discuss dangerous ideas,” as one of our previous directors used to say. Nowhere is this search for common ground more important than in the search for solutions to our momentous environmental challenges.

For this purpose, the museum has recently begun to sponsor “town halls” on contentious environmental issues, most recently on the topic of “Oil in the Channel.” We’ll do many more of these in the future and, while the McCain event is not a town hall sponsored by the museum, it is nevertheless an event that is exceedingly important to our community.

People may or may not agree with Sen. McCain’s position on environmental issues, but I believe that it is worth, even important, to listen to him. We would be delighted if Sen. Barack Obama and his campaign held a similar meeting at the museum.

Karl Hutterer is executive director of the Santa Barbara Museum of Natural History.

Support Noozhawk Today!

Our professional journalists work tirelessly to report on local news so you can be more informed and engaged in your community. This quality, local reporting is free for you to read and share, but it's not free to produce.

You count on us to deliver timely, relevant local news, 24/7. Can we count on you to invest in our newsroom and help secure its future?

We provide special member benefits to show how much we appreciate your support.

Email
I would like give...
Great! You're joining as a Red-Tailed Hawk!
  • Ask
  • Vote
  • Investigate
  • Answer

Noozhawk Asks: What’s Your Question?

Welcome to Noozhawk Asks, a new feature in which you ask the questions, you help decide what Noozhawk investigates, and you work with us to find the answers.

Here’s how it works: You share your questions with us in the nearby box. In some cases, we may work with you to find the answers. In others, we may ask you to vote on your top choices to help us narrow the scope. And we’ll be regularly asking you for your feedback on a specific issue or topic.

We also expect to work together with the reader who asked the winning questions to find the answer together. Noozhawk’s objective is to come at questions from a place of curiosity and openness, and we believe a transparent collaboration is the key to achieve it.

The results of our investigation will be published here in this Noozhawk Asks section. Once or twice a month, we plan to do a review of what was asked and answered.

Thanks for asking!

Click Here to Get Started >

Reader Comments

Noozhawk is no longer accepting reader comments on our articles. Click here for the announcement. Readers are instead invited to submit letters to the editor by emailing them to [email protected]. Please provide your full name and community, as well as contact information for verification purposes only.