Tuesday, October 16 , 2018, 6:19 pm | Fair 73º

 
 
 
 

Santa Barbara Council Votes to Proceed with Ballot Measure for New Police Headquarters

Rebuilding the Figueroa Street facility would cost about $50 million; city staff will move ahead with the process and report back in 120 days

After a unanimous vote by the City Council vote on Tuesday, Santa Barbara voters are one step closer to being presented with a ballot measure asking them to fund new police headquarters.

That item wouldn’t be on the ballot until November 2012, and the City Council has yet to decide what type of financing mechanism would be used or how long voters would be asked to pay. City staff will be moving forward with the next steps of the project and will brief the council again in 120 days.

The Santa Barbara Police Department’s Figueroa Street building was built in 1959 and has numerous structural problems, including violations of seismic standards. About $50 million is needed for the rebuild, and city staff says $20 million of that could be used from the Redevelopment Agency budget.

The council confirmed Tuesday that rebuilding the police headquarters is the city’s No. 1 capital infrastructure need. It also gave the OK for city staff to begin exploring where to relocate the dispatch center until a new building could be built.

“The concern is that, in a seismic event, you might lose the effectiveness of your call center,” Community Development Director Paul Casey said, adding that the dispatch center would move before the building project begins. He said, however, that the dispatch center would move back into the new building once completed.

Councilman Bendy White acknowledged that financial times are bad, but that the facility is badly in need of repair, and reminded the council of the recent earthquake in Japan.

“We are at risk of that here,” he said. “Our communications system sits at the bottom of an unsafe building.”

White encouraged the City Council to put out a call to the community for the funding, and said it should begin to transition the dispatch center out of the building.

Councilman Randy Rowse said he thinks that once the public sees the condition of the building inside, funding will become a priority.

“What I’ve seen was Third World at best,” he said.

A bond measure to overhaul the station was put before voters in November 1999, but it failed because only 45 percent of voters supported it. The new measure would need either two-thirds or a majority of voters to support it, depending on the type of ballot measure selected.

On the Santa Barbara County level, Sheriff Bill Brown tried to sway voters on a half-cent sales tax to fund a new county jail, but the measure was resoundingly defeated by voters in November, despite widespread political support.

That effort was brought up several times Tuesday among the council members, including Mayor Helene Schneider.

“The City of Santa Barbara voted a little over 50 percent for Measure S,” she said, adding that she believes residents understand the need for adequate infrastructure.

During public comment, one person suggested putting the new headquarters in the vacant Chapala One building. Casey said it’s not an option because police stations must meet a higher building code that schools and hospitals also follow.

“In many ways, it’s what Cottage Hospital had to do,” he said.

The city also would have to pay for Chapala One and then gut the building, which Casey said wouldn’t be cost effective.

Councilman Frank Hotchkiss asked whether the new facility would have a jail, but Police Chief Cam Sanchez said that would be extremely expensive, and put the department in a position of financial and legal liability.

Councilman Grant House said he would endorse only $10 million of RDA money going toward the new building, saying, “$20 million goes too far, I believe.”

He added that the council would be unable to meet other obligations with the money, but he eventually agreed to go forward with the process because it will be re-evaluated in 120 days.

Rowse said he understood House’s concern, but “we as an agency need to go the extra mile,” he said, adding that it would be difficult enough to get the public to approve the ballot measure.

Noozhawk staff writer Lara Cooper can be reached at .(JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address). Follow Noozhawk on Twitter: @noozhawk or @NoozhawkNews.

Support Noozhawk Today

You are an important ally in our mission to deliver clear, objective, high-quality professional news reporting for Santa Barbara, Goleta and the rest of Santa Barbara County. Join the Hawks Club today to help keep Noozhawk soaring.

We offer four membership levels: $5 a month, $10 a month, $25 a month or $1 a week. Payments can be made using a credit card, Apple Pay or Google Pay, or click here for information on recurring credit-card payments and a mailing address for checks.

Thank you for your vital support.

Become a Noozhawk Supporter

First name
Last name
Email
Select your monthly membership
Or choose an annual membership
×

Payment Information

Membership Subscription

You are enrolling in . Thank you for joining the Hawks Club.

Payment Method

Pay by Credit Card:

Mastercard, Visa, American Express, Discover
One click only, please!

Pay with Apple Pay or Google Pay:

Noozhawk partners with Stripe to provide secure invoicing and payments processing.
You may cancel your membership at any time by sending an email to .(JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address).

  • Ask
  • Vote
  • Investigate
  • Answer

Noozhawk Asks: What’s Your Question?

Welcome to Noozhawk Asks, a new feature in which you ask the questions, you help decide what Noozhawk investigates, and you work with us to find the answers.

Here’s how it works: You share your questions with us in the nearby box. In some cases, we may work with you to find the answers. In others, we may ask you to vote on your top choices to help us narrow the scope. And we’ll be regularly asking you for your feedback on a specific issue or topic.

We also expect to work together with the reader who asked the winning questions to find the answer together. Noozhawk’s objective is to come at questions from a place of curiosity and openness, and we believe a transparent collaboration is the key to achieve it.

The results of our investigation will be published here in this Noozhawk Asks section. Once or twice a month, we plan to do a review of what was asked and answered.

Thanks for asking!

Click Here to Get Started >

Reader Comments

Noozhawk is no longer accepting reader comments on our articles. Click here for the announcement. Readers are instead invited to submit letters to the editor by emailing them to [email protected]. Please provide your full name and community, as well as contact information for verification purposes only.