Saturday, September 22 , 2018, 8:35 pm | Fair 61º

 
 
 
 

Captain’s Log: Clean Fuel Only Zone Expands for Commercial Ocean Shipping

Preventing whale strikes wasn't the reason, but it should be a priority

A couple of weeks ago I wrote about efforts to slow the speed of the big commercial ships transiting the Santa Barbara Channel. The hope was to reduce whale strikes.

I noted that the solution would work no better than a leaf blower cleans up a mess because the speed reduction solution compels those ships to move outside the Channel Islands, where they can burn high-polluting fuel, travel fast and still run a grave risk of striking and killing or maiming whales.

A significant new game-changing development has emerged. The California Air Resources Board has expanded the Clean Fuel Regulatory Zone so that it extends 24 nautical miles seaward from the Channel Islands rather than from the mainland coast, as it currently stands. Why? Not to save whales, sadly, although I’m hopeful that the argument carried some weight.

The real reason for the expansion of the zone was that the Navy complained loudly about increased commercial shipping through its Point Mugu Sea Range, where it tests warfare resources and technology and where it engages in complex training programs. Delay of that testing and training can run into the tens of millions of dollars per day (more than is saved by the shipping companies by running through the area) and can possibly result in field deployment of resources that are not fully tested and result in troops not fully trained.

Personally, I feel more secure when our military resources and troops are adequately tested and trained, so I’m on the side of the Navy in this argument.

What does this mean with regards to pollution and ship strikes on whales? Plenty. Now, big commercial ships will have to move even farther offshore if they want to continue burning cheap, high-pollution “bunker” fuel and run around at high-speeds, risking injury and death to our whales.

The other option is to move shipping back inside the Channel Islands where they must burn more expensive but cleaner fuel. They are not yet absolutely required to slow down to save whales, and I can tell you from experience that few of them slow down on their own. So ship strikes on whales are still a deadly problem.

The shippers will crunch their numbers and perhaps make their decisions on where to travel based on fiscal considerations rather than clean air and safe whale considerations. Let us hope they make responsible decisions that result in cleaner air and safety for whales.

— Capt. David Bacon operates WaveWalker Charters and is president of SOFTIN Inc., a nonprofit organization providing seafaring opportunities for those in need. Visit softininc.blogspot.com to learn more about the organization and how you can help.

Support Noozhawk Today

You are an important ally in our mission to deliver clear, objective, high-quality professional news reporting for Santa Barbara, Goleta and the rest of Santa Barbara County. Join the Hawks Club today to help keep Noozhawk soaring.

We offer four membership levels: $5 a month, $10 a month, $25 a month or $1 a week. Payments can be made using a credit card, Apple Pay or Google Pay, or click here for information on recurring credit-card payments and a mailing address for checks.

Thank you for your vital support.

Become a Noozhawk Supporter

First name
Last name
Email
Select your monthly membership
Or choose an annual membership
×

Payment Information

Membership Subscription

You are enrolling in . Thank you for joining the Hawks Club.

Payment Method

Pay by Credit Card:

Mastercard, Visa, American Express, Discover
One click only, please!

Pay with Apple Pay or Google Pay:

Noozhawk partners with Stripe to provide secure invoicing and payments processing.
You may cancel your membership at any time by sending an email to .(JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address).

  • Ask
  • Vote
  • Investigate
  • Answer

Noozhawk Asks: What’s Your Question?

Welcome to Noozhawk Asks, a new feature in which you ask the questions, you help decide what Noozhawk investigates, and you work with us to find the answers.

Here’s how it works: You share your questions with us in the nearby box. In some cases, we may work with you to find the answers. In others, we may ask you to vote on your top choices to help us narrow the scope. And we’ll be regularly asking you for your feedback on a specific issue or topic.

We also expect to work together with the reader who asked the winning questions to find the answer together. Noozhawk’s objective is to come at questions from a place of curiosity and openness, and we believe a transparent collaboration is the key to achieve it.

The results of our investigation will be published here in this Noozhawk Asks section. Once or twice a month, we plan to do a review of what was asked and answered.

Thanks for asking!

Click Here to Get Started >

Reader Comments

Noozhawk is no longer accepting reader comments on our articles. Click here for the announcement. Readers are instead invited to submit letters to the editor by emailing them to [email protected]. Please provide your full name and community, as well as contact information for verification purposes only.

Daily Noozhawk

Subscribe to Noozhawk's A.M. Report, our free e-Bulletin sent out every day at 4:15 a.m. with Noozhawk's top stories, hand-picked by the editors.

Sign Up Now >