Friday, October 19 , 2018, 11:56 pm | Fair 59º

 
 
 
 

County Supervisors to Take Up Jail Tax, Coastal Commission Recommendations

Also on Tuesday's agenda is a Grand Jury report on a Santa Ynez Valley jurisdictional dispute

After a grueling hearing last week, the Santa Barbara County Board of Supervisors will continue its discussion Tuesday of the California Coastal Commission’s proposed changes to the county’s Coastal Land Use Policy.

While most members of the public who attended last week’s hearing — including several who sit on the Gaviota Coast Planning Advisory Committee, known as GavPAC — appeared in varying degrees to take issue with the commission’s recommendations, the supervisors said they wanted to further discuss the issue, particularly to give First District Supervisor Salud Carbajal, who had been unable to attend because of travel delays, the opportunity to weigh in.

With changes to coastal policy aimed at beefing up the appeal process for coastal development and changes in land use, public outcry stemmed from what many saw as an attempt by the Coastal Commission to overstep the bounds of its traditional authority. Others said that if the county doesn’t approve the changes, coastal land use policy would revert to a status they said would effectively negate several long-range community plans in the works.

One of the proposed changes would prohibit maintenance and repair of existing private stairways to the beach, and another would require public access trails in return for expansion of agricultural operations. Aside from their concern about members of the public interfering with the agricultural production process, some growers and ranchers said that having to go through the Coastal Commission’s approval process would take an inordinate amount of time.

“Some of these proposals were made by people who don’t live in the real world, and it’s up to you — our elected officials — to stand your ground,” said June Van Wingerden, president of the Santa Barbara County Flower Growers and Nursery Association, echoing the concerns of several agriculture representatives that the commission’s extended control over agricultural designations would hamper their ability to maintain economic viability. “We have had a number of dealings with the Coastal Commission, and none of them have been good.”

Commenting on his own behalf, Phil McKenna, president of the Naples Coalition — a collection of environmental groups including the Environmental Defense Center, the Sierra Club and the Surfrider Foundation — suggested that if implemented, the commission’s recommendations could cause more harm than good.

“I think we may have a Coastal Commission staff which may not understand the implications of their recommendations,” he said.

1D1 Grand Jury Report

The Board of Supervisors also will discuss a Grand Jury report submitted nearly three months ago delving into a jurisdictional dispute in the Santa Ynez Valley.

Titled “Currents and Undercurrents in the Santa Ynez Valley,” the report came from a number of complaints about the Santa Ynez River Water Conservation District, Improvement District 1, also known as ID1.

Among the complaints made to the Grand Jury were allegations that the district’s board of directors had committed violations of the Brown Act — legislation regulating transparency protocols for public agencies — and provided inadequate descriptions of agenda items.

Other complaints were aimed at an attempt by the district to get legislation — Assembly Bill 2686, authored by Assemblyman Pedro Nava — passed, rolling the district into two other similar special districts in the area. Critics maintained that the move amounted to an inappropriate expansion of authority, and called for a blue ribbon commission led by Third District Supervisor Doreen Farr to investigate.

Farr had replied that she is not qualified to convene such a commission without first discussing it with the full board.

Jail Tax Measure

Having supported sending a half-percent sales tax — dubbed the jail construction, operation and public safety enhancement tax — to the polls at last week’s hearing, the Board of Supervisors is expected to grant final approval Tuesday, officially placing the issue on the Nov. 2 ballot.

If passed, the tax measure would ask voters to approve for a period of 10 years a half-percent tax to replace a 1 percent tax scheduled to expire in June 2011.

Sheriff Bill Brown has touted the necessity of the funding to build what he said is a much-needed jail in the North County, adding that the tax in essence would bring Santa Barbara County’s current 8.75 percent sales and use tax down to 8.25 percent.

Noozhawk staff writer Ben Preston can be reached at .(JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address).

Support Noozhawk Today

You are an important ally in our mission to deliver clear, objective, high-quality professional news reporting for Santa Barbara, Goleta and the rest of Santa Barbara County. Join the Hawks Club today to help keep Noozhawk soaring.

We offer four membership levels: $5 a month, $10 a month, $25 a month or $1 a week. Payments can be made using a credit card, Apple Pay or Google Pay, or click here for information on recurring credit-card payments and a mailing address for checks.

Thank you for your vital support.

Become a Noozhawk Supporter

First name
Last name
Email
Select your monthly membership
Or choose an annual membership
×

Payment Information

Membership Subscription

You are enrolling in . Thank you for joining the Hawks Club.

Payment Method

Pay by Credit Card:

Mastercard, Visa, American Express, Discover
One click only, please!

Pay with Apple Pay or Google Pay:

Noozhawk partners with Stripe to provide secure invoicing and payments processing.
You may cancel your membership at any time by sending an email to .(JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address).

  • Ask
  • Vote
  • Investigate
  • Answer

Noozhawk Asks: What’s Your Question?

Welcome to Noozhawk Asks, a new feature in which you ask the questions, you help decide what Noozhawk investigates, and you work with us to find the answers.

Here’s how it works: You share your questions with us in the nearby box. In some cases, we may work with you to find the answers. In others, we may ask you to vote on your top choices to help us narrow the scope. And we’ll be regularly asking you for your feedback on a specific issue or topic.

We also expect to work together with the reader who asked the winning questions to find the answer together. Noozhawk’s objective is to come at questions from a place of curiosity and openness, and we believe a transparent collaboration is the key to achieve it.

The results of our investigation will be published here in this Noozhawk Asks section. Once or twice a month, we plan to do a review of what was asked and answered.

Thanks for asking!

Click Here to Get Started >

Reader Comments

Noozhawk is no longer accepting reader comments on our articles. Click here for the announcement. Readers are instead invited to submit letters to the editor by emailing them to [email protected]. Please provide your full name and community, as well as contact information for verification purposes only.