Thursday, November 15 , 2018, 12:04 pm | Mostly Cloudy 75º

 
 
 
 

Mark Cromer: Crazy from the Heat

An overcrowded California is running out of water and leadership

As California heads into high summer, those sweltering weeks that burn like a fever from mid-July well into September, there is no indication that our state or federal leadership has yet to truly grasp the environmental catastrophe the Golden State now faces.

Mark Cromer
Mark Cromer

Perhaps, as the saying goes, they are “crazy from the heat.”

Consider that less than two months ago, Sen. Dianne Feinstein, D-Calif., took to the Senate floor and introduced a so-called farm bill — known as AgJOBS — that would legalize millions of illegal immigrant field workers and their families and, even more amazingly, set the stage to import millions more exploitable laborers to work in grueling conditions.

“There is a farm emergency in this country,” Feinstein said in May. “Some of it is caused by drought, including out West where California has had, for three years, a very serious drought. But most of it is caused by an absence of farm labor.”

Yet just six weeks later, detailed news reports from California’s fertile Central Valley have confirmed that thousands of farm workers are now unemployed and driving hundreds of miles each day as they crisscross the state desperately looking for jobs in fields that are simply drying up.

A shortage of water has led to an abundance — not an absence — of cheap labor.

California’s severe drought — a water shortage that has loomed large across the Southwest for far more than three years — has turned farmers’ fields into a dusty tundra that may foreshadow a West Coast dust bowl.

Ominously, hydrologists reported that this spring layers of dust coated the upper reaches of the Sierra snowpack, which accelerated its rate of melt and increased the pace of runoff — leading water managers to either release water early or risk flooding.

That’s hardly a problem based on an abundance of water arriving in our reservoirs too early, but rather the prospect of losing precious little runoff too soon.

“It creates a high-pressured game of Twister for water managers,” Thomas Painter, director of the Snow Optics Lab at the University of Utah, told the Los Angeles Times just two weeks after Feinstein introduced her bill. “They’re having to make decisions quickly to hold on to water (and risk flooding) or release water.”

Either way it is a loss — and one we cannot afford.

California’s water supplies continue to dwindle even as its population grows, with only half of the expected runoff from the Sierra snowpack materializing in 2007. By last year, just as Los Angeles County closed in on 10 million people, the Sierra runoff was only 40 percent of normal.

Yet as our critical water supplies in California literally evaporate before our eyes, our elected officials tout more growth, increased immigration and an expanded consumer-driven economy with all the zeal of men and women cocktailing at a Prozac party.

It is so politically incorrect to candidly assess the link between population growth (and the runaway development it fuels) and our water crisis that even much of academia has not only joined the party, but has actually cried for the band to play on.

Harvard economics professor Edward Glaeser unleashed his figurative pen to declare the solution to America’s environmental problems was not less people, but more — moving to California. Glaeser tore into the few Californian environmentalists who have dared to speak against further population growth in the face of a shrinking water supply.

“They ... emphasize that California’s water crisis makes further expansion impossible,” Glaeser wrote. “But today, the overwhelming majority of water in California is directed to farms, not people. Using 10 percent of the state’s agricultural water for new households could address the water needs of a massive increase in state population.”

Written like a true Harvard wonk ensconced in an ivy-covered tower that’s safely removed from the hard realities of an overcrowded California and its crumbling infrastructure, gridlocked traffic and bankrupt treasury.

This summer California stands at 40 million people and is on track to hit 60 million water-drinking bodies by midcentury, possibly sooner. We have progressively less water, but we’re growing people like there’s no tomorrow.

There will indeed be a tomorrow. But thanks to Feinstein, Glaeser and every other bon vivant whistling Dixie past our dry well, we may not wish it so.

— Mark Cromer is a senior writing fellow at Californians for Population Stabilization.

Support Noozhawk Today

You are an important ally in our mission to deliver clear, objective, high-quality professional news reporting for Santa Barbara, Goleta and the rest of Santa Barbara County. Join the Hawks Club today to help keep Noozhawk soaring.

We offer four membership levels: $5 a month, $10 a month, $25 a month or $1 a week. Payments can be made using a credit card, Apple Pay or Google Pay, or click here for information on recurring credit-card payments and a mailing address for checks.

Thank you for your vital support.

Become a Noozhawk Supporter

First name
Last name
Email
Select your monthly membership
Or choose an annual membership
×

Payment Information

Membership Subscription

You are enrolling in . Thank you for joining the Hawks Club.

Payment Method

Pay by Credit Card:

Mastercard, Visa, American Express, Discover
One click only, please!

Pay with Apple Pay or Google Pay:

Noozhawk partners with Stripe to provide secure invoicing and payments processing.
You may cancel your membership at any time by sending an email to .(JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address).

  • Ask
  • Vote
  • Investigate
  • Answer

Noozhawk Asks: What’s Your Question?

Welcome to Noozhawk Asks, a new feature in which you ask the questions, you help decide what Noozhawk investigates, and you work with us to find the answers.

Here’s how it works: You share your questions with us in the nearby box. In some cases, we may work with you to find the answers. In others, we may ask you to vote on your top choices to help us narrow the scope. And we’ll be regularly asking you for your feedback on a specific issue or topic.

We also expect to work together with the reader who asked the winning questions to find the answer together. Noozhawk’s objective is to come at questions from a place of curiosity and openness, and we believe a transparent collaboration is the key to achieve it.

The results of our investigation will be published here in this Noozhawk Asks section. Once or twice a month, we plan to do a review of what was asked and answered.

Thanks for asking!

Click Here to Get Started >

Reader Comments

Noozhawk is no longer accepting reader comments on our articles. Click here for the announcement. Readers are instead invited to submit letters to the editor by emailing them to [email protected]. Please provide your full name and community, as well as contact information for verification purposes only.