Pixel Tracker

Tuesday, February 19 , 2019, 10:37 pm | Fair 41º


Froma Harrop: Dr. Donald Berwick, Taxpayer Hero

New health-care czar will put Republicans in their place and elevate status of working-class Americans

Welcome, Dr. Donald Berwick. Once you pull the arrows out of your back, you can get down to the important work for which you are supremely qualified: fixing the government health-insurance programs.

Froma Harrop
Froma Harrop

President Barack Obama named you head of the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services through a recess appointment. That deprived Senate Republicans of another televised round denouncing “socialized medicine” — although they are churning out news releases calling you a “health-care-rationing czar” and advocate of “cookie-cutter medicine.”

A pediatrician and expert on medical economics, you are a savior to we who pay the bills through our premiums and taxes. But to the folks milking the system and the politicians they control — Republicans, but some Democrats, too — you are a threat.

Nonetheless, the American Medical Association and the American Hospital Association both sing your praises. They also have stakes in this business but understand that you know what you’re doing.

You got into trouble by saying that a civilized health-care system must treat the poor, and that will require a “redistribution of wealth” from the better- to the lesser-off. That is obvious, if not a politically adroit choice of words. You could have then noted that medical subsidies also go up the income ladder — such as when dishwashers’ taxes support the Medicare benefits of millionaire retirees. In this country, the great majority of the uninsured are working poor. (The very poor have Medicaid.)

Anyhow, you’ve run programs to reduce medical errors and hospital-acquired infections. That improved care and cut costs at the same time. The former president of Thedacare in Appleton, Wis., credits your “principles of continuous improvement” with helping reduce the cost of inpatient care at his hospital by 25 percent.

When did saving taxpayers money become socialistic? When Republicans decided to define “free-market solutions” as seeing how many tax dollars they can shovel into private coffers.

Exhibit A is their Medicare drug benefit, which was written to enrich pharmaceutical companies and insurers. By forbidding the government to directly negotiate drug prices, Republicans maximized the program’s costs. Unlike everyone else in our capitalistic system, taxpayers are apparently not allowed to bargain for a better deal. That would be socialism.

Exhibit B is the Republicans’ tireless assaults against the “public option,” which was stripped out of the final health-care legislation. The public option was to be a government-run health insurance plan that competed with the privately run plans. Its purpose was to stop private insurers from overcharging for their plans — and sending their inflated bills to the taxpayers.

Speaking of overcharges, socialized medicine and government-run systems, let’s look at Exhibit C. Medicare is a government-run system that’s far more socialized than anything in the new health-care reforms. And it’s a major cause of America’s growing deficits.

You’d think that the alleged haters of socialism and deficits would at least support ending overpayments to insurers participating in the Medicare Advantage program. But no, the Democrats had to do it alone.

By the way, these bloated charges had driven up the premiums paid by ordinary folks enrolled in traditional Medicare. They tacked an extra $89 to the average couple’s 2009 premium, according to the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities.

Dr. Berwick, part of me wishes that your hearing had gone forward. When your critics got to the “wealth distribution” part, you might have asked what in their religion goes against saving the lives of working-class Americans.

Not every manager of medical spending can be trusted to preserve the glories of American health care, but you can. So go forth, Dr. Berwick, and trim a few thousand off our health-care bills. We taxpayers won’t mind.

Froma Harrop is an independent voice on politics, economics and culture, and blogs on RealClearPolitics.com. She is also a member of the editorial board at The Providence (R.I.) Journal. Click here to contact her at Creators.com.

Talk to Us!

Please take Noozhawk's audience survey to help us understand what you expect — and want — from us. It'll take you just a few minutes. Thank you!

Get Started >

Support Noozhawk Today

You are an important ally in our mission to deliver clear, objective, high-quality professional news reporting for Santa Barbara, Goleta and the rest of Santa Barbara County. Join the Hawks Club today to help keep Noozhawk soaring.

We offer four membership levels: $5 a month, $10 a month, $25 a month or $1 a week. Payments can be made using a credit card, Apple Pay or Google Pay, or click here for information on recurring credit-card payments and a mailing address for checks.

Thank you for your vital support.

Become a Noozhawk Supporter

First name
Last name
Select your monthly membership
Or choose an annual membership

Payment Information

Membership Subscription

You are enrolling in . Thank you for joining the Hawks Club.

Payment Method

Pay by Credit Card:

Mastercard, Visa, American Express, Discover
One click only, please!

Pay with Apple Pay or Google Pay:

Noozhawk partners with Stripe to provide secure invoicing and payments processing.
You may cancel your membership at any time by sending an email to .(JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address).

  • Ask
  • Vote
  • Investigate
  • Answer

Noozhawk Asks: What’s Your Question?

Welcome to Noozhawk Asks, a new feature in which you ask the questions, you help decide what Noozhawk investigates, and you work with us to find the answers.

Here’s how it works: You share your questions with us in the nearby box. In some cases, we may work with you to find the answers. In others, we may ask you to vote on your top choices to help us narrow the scope. And we’ll be regularly asking you for your feedback on a specific issue or topic.

We also expect to work together with the reader who asked the winning questions to find the answer together. Noozhawk’s objective is to come at questions from a place of curiosity and openness, and we believe a transparent collaboration is the key to achieve it.

The results of our investigation will be published here in this Noozhawk Asks section. Once or twice a month, we plan to do a review of what was asked and answered.

Thanks for asking!

Click Here to Get Started >

Reader Comments

Noozhawk is no longer accepting reader comments on our articles. Click here for the announcement. Readers are instead invited to submit letters to the editor by emailing them to [email protected]. Please provide your full name and community, as well as contact information for verification purposes only.