Wednesday, June 20 , 2018, 10:52 am | Overcast with Haze 62º


Statewide Survey: Majority See Global Warming, Energy as Key to Campaign, and Prefer Obama

Voters favor the California law to curb emissions, but the partisan split widens

Most likely voters in California say the presidential candidates’ positions on global warming and energy policy are important in determining their vote, and a majority trust President Barack Obama over Mitt Romney on these issues. These are among the key findings of a statewide survey released Wednesday by the Public Policy Institute of California, conducted with funding from the William and Flora Hewlett Foundation.

While global warming and energy policy have not been the focus of debate in the campaigns so far, 30 percent of California likely voters say these issues are very important in determining their choice for president and 42 percent say they are somewhat important. A majority — 54 percent — say they trust Obama to handle these issues, while 33 percent trust Romney.

Likely voters’ concerns about the impact of global warming are echoed in their responses to a number of questions in PPIC’s 12th annual survey on the environment. Most say it is a serious threat (40 percent very serious, 26 percent somewhat serious) to the economy and quality of life in California’s future. Most (62 percent) continue to favor the state law requiring California to reduce its greenhouse gas emissions, and most (64 percent) say steps need to be taken right away to counter the effects of global warming.

“California’s likely voters trust Obama over Romney on global warming policy by a wide margin — even though a majority also say that the federal government is not doing enough to address this issue,” said Mark Baldassare, PPIC’s president and CEO.

Obama’s 21-point advantage on global warming and energy issues is much larger than his lead in the overall matchup with Romney. Asked how they would vote if the election were held today, 51 percent of likely voters choose Obama and 40 percent choose Romney. Obama’s 11-point advantage on this question is the same as in May (50 percent to 39 percent).

Today, both candidates have strong support from likely voters in their respective parties (85 percent of Democrats favor Obama, 81 percent of Republicans favor Romney). Among independents, 53 percent choose Obama and 37 percent choose Romney. Obama leads Romney among women (51 percent to 38 percent), Latinos (68 percent to 19 percent), and voters under 35 (63 percent to 29 percent). Other groups are more divided: men (50 percent Obama, 43 percent Romney), whites (44 percent Obama, 49 percent Romney), and voters 35 and older (ages 35 to 54: 47 percent Obama, 42 percent Romney; 55 and older: 49 percent Obama, 43 percent Romney).

Likely voters’ preference for Obama on global warming and energy policy does not translate to majority support for his handling of environmental issues. They are evenly divided on this question (46 percent approve, 46 percent disapprove). The president’s overall job approval rating is similar, at 50 percent among likely voters (47 percent disapprove). The U.S. Congress has low ratings on job performance (15 percent approve, 81 percent disapprove) and on handling environmental issues (15 percent approve, 74 percent disapprove).

Asked to assess what government is doing to address global warming, 53 percent of likely voters say the federal government is not doing enough, while 23 percent say it is doing just enough and 21 percent say it is doing more than enough. Fewer say state and local governments are falling short (42 percent each).

Brown’s Job Approval Holds at 46 Percent

In their evaluations of the state’s elected leaders, 46 percent of likely voters approve of Gov. Jerry Brown’s job performance (42 percent disapprove, 11 percent don’t know), similar to May (42 percent) and last July (48 percent). On environmental issues, 41 percent approve and 36 percent disapprove of the job the governor is doing, while 23 percent are unsure. The state Legislature’s job approval rating (21 percent) is similar to May (17 percent) despite passing a budget on time for the second straight year. But approval today is slightly higher than last July (15 percent) and much higher than July 2010 (10 percent). Likely voters give the Legislature a higher rating (29 percent) for its handling of environmental issues than for overall job performance.

Partisan Divide Grows Sharply on AB 32

A strong majority of Californians (78 percent) think that the world’s temperature has probably gone up in the past 100 years (17 percent probably not). Most (60 percent) say the effects of global warming have already begun. But while a solid majority (71 percent) support the state law requiring emissions reductions — AB 32 — the partisan divide has increased significantly. Just before then-Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger signed the law in 2006, 65 percent of adults were in favor, including two in three across parties. Today, Democrats (84 percent) and independents (65 percent) favor the law, but Republicans are divided (44 percent favor, 48 percent oppose).

Asked how state action to curb global warming would affect jobs in the state, 42 percent of adults say the result would be more jobs, 25 percent say fewer jobs and 25 percent say there would be no effect.

Majorities of adults — across party lines — favor various ways the state and federal governments can address global warming:

» Requiring increased energy efficiency for residential and commercial buildings and appliances (77 percent)

» Requiring industrial plants, oil refineries and commercial facilities to reduce emissions (82 percent)

» Encouraging local governments to change land use and transportation planning so that people could drive less (77 percent)

» Requiring all automakers to further reduce the emissions of greenhouse gases from new cars (78 percent)

» Requiring fuel providers to reduce the carbon intensity of transportation fuels by at least 10 percent by the year 2020 (79 percent)

With Cap-and-Trade Auctions Set to Begin, Most Are Unaware of Program

Most Californians (57 percent) have heard nothing about the state’s cap-and-trade program, which will be rolled out in November with the first state auction of emissions permits (12 percent have heard a lot, 30 percent a little). A cornerstone of efforts to implement AB 32, this program will set limits on companies’ greenhouse gas emissions and allow those who emit less to sell permits to those who exceed their limits. After hearing a brief description of the program, a slim majority of adults (53 percent) say they favor it (36 percent oppose). Those who say they have heard a lot about cap and trade oppose it (62 percent vs. 35 percent in favor). More than half of those who have heard little (53 percent) or nothing about it (57 percent) are in favor.

The state will generate new revenues from the permit auctions and is expected to raise $1 billion in the first year. But most Californians are pessimistic about how the money will be spent.

“When they are told about new state revenues that will be generated from the cap-and-trade program, two in three Californians say they have very little or no confidence that the state government will use the money wisely,” Baldassare said.

Just 5 percent say they have a great deal of confidence that the state will use this money wisely, and 27 percent have only some confidence.

The cap-and-trade program has generated controversy because of concerns that companies in low-income areas will buy permits to exceed their emissions caps, worsening health risks for residents. Asked about this issue, about half of Californians (48 percent) say that companies buying permits under the program will create a disproportionate health threat in low-income communities and 40 percent disagree.

Air Pollution a Regional Problem for Many

Two-thirds of Californians (64 percent) say air pollution is a big problem (25 percent) or somewhat of one (39 percent) in the region where they live, while 35 percent say it is not a problem. Adults in Los Angeles (35 percent), the Central Valley (32 percent) and the Inland Empire (30 percent) are much more likely than those in Orange/San Diego counties (17 percent) and the San Francisco Bay Area (16 percent) to say that regional air pollution is a big problem. Across racial and ethnic groups, Latinos (37 percent) and blacks (33 percent) are much more likely than Asians (20 percent) and whites (18 percent) to say air pollution is a big problem.

About half of Californians (49 percent) say air pollution in their region is a serious health threat to them and their immediate family (18 percent very serious, 31 percent somewhat serious). Forty-one percent of adults say that they or someone in their immediate family suffers from asthma or other respiratory problems. Blacks are most likely to say this (54 percent), followed by Latinos (43 percent), whites (39 percent) and Asians (32 percent). Is air pollution a more serious health threat in lower-income areas than others in their region? Californians are divided in their responses to this question (47 percent yes, 46 percent no).

Asked what policies they would support to reduce regional air pollution, majorities are willing to see tougher air pollution standards on the following:

» New passenger vehicles (65 percent)

» Diesel engine vehicles (71 percent)

» Commercial and industrial activities (70 percent)

» Agriculture and farm activities (54 percent)

Divided on “Fracking”

Most Californians (54 percent) have heard at least a little about hydraulic fracturing, or “fracking,” which is used to extract oil and natural gas from underground rock formations (23 percent have heard a lot, 31 percent a little, 46 percent nothing at all). Fracking for oil extraction is occurring in the state, and there is debate about expanding and regulating it. Residents who have heard about fracking are divided about using it in California (42 percent favor, 46 percent oppose, 12 percent don’t know).

On other energy policy issues, just 31 percent of Californians favor building more nuclear power plants at this time — near the record low (30 percent) of last July. Majorities across regions are opposed.

Residents are divided on the question of allowing more oil drilling off California’s coast: 48 percent are in favor, 48 percent are opposed. Across regions, 56 percent of residents living along the state’s northern coast are opposed to more drilling, while South Coast residents are divided (47 percent favor, 50 percent opposed) and inland residents are in favor (58 percent).

A large majority of residents (78 percent) favor increasing federal funding to develop wind, solar and hydrogen technology. Californians show similar support (77 percent) for the state policy requiring one-third of electricity to come from renewable energy sources by the year 2020. But support drops to 44 percent on this question if the policy means higher electricity bills.

About the Survey

Findings are based on a survey of 2,500 adult residents reached by landline and cell phones throughout the state. Interviews took place from July 10-24. They were conducted in English, Spanish, Chinese (Mandarin or Cantonese), Korean and Vietnamese, according to respondents’ preferences. The sampling error, taking design effects from weighting into consideration, is plus or minus 2.9 percent for all adults. For the 1,668 registered voters, it is plus or minus 3.2 percent, and for the 1,131 likely voters, it is plus or minus 3.6 percent.

Click here to read the full survey.


Support Noozhawk Today

You are an important ally in our mission to deliver clear, objective, high-quality professional news reporting for Santa Barbara, Goleta and the rest of Santa Barbara County. Join the Hawks Club today to help keep Noozhawk soaring.

We offer four membership levels: $5 a month, $10 a month, $25 a month or $1 a week. Payments can be made through PayPal below, or click here for information on recurring credit-card payments.

Thank you for your vital support.

Become a Noozhawk Supporter

First name
Last name
Enter your email
Select your membership level

Payment Information

You are purchasing:

Payment Method

Pay by Credit Card:

Mastercard, Visa, American Express, Discover

Pay with Apple Pay or Google Pay:

Noozhawk partners with Stripe to provide secure invoicing and payments processing.

  • Ask
  • Vote
  • Investigate
  • Answer

Noozhawk Asks: What’s Your Question?

Welcome to Noozhawk Asks, a new feature in which you ask the questions, you help decide what Noozhawk investigates, and you work with us to find the answers.

Here’s how it works: You share your questions with us in the nearby box. In some cases, we may work with you to find the answers. In others, we may ask you to vote on your top choices to help us narrow the scope. And we’ll be regularly asking you for your feedback on a specific issue or topic.

We also expect to work together with the reader who asked the winning questions to find the answer together. Noozhawk’s objective is to come at questions from a place of curiosity and openness, and we believe a transparent collaboration is the key to achieve it.

The results of our investigation will be published here in this Noozhawk Asks section. Once or twice a month, we plan to do a review of what was asked and answered.

Thanks for asking!

Click Here to Get Started >

Reader Comments

Noozhawk is no longer accepting reader comments on our articles. Click here for the announcement. Readers are instead invited to submit letters to the editor by emailing them to [email protected]. Please provide your full name and community, as well as contact information for verification purposes only.

Daily Noozhawk

Subscribe to Noozhawk's A.M. Report, our free e-Bulletin sent out every day at 4:15 a.m. with Noozhawk's top stories, hand-picked by the editors.

Sign Up Now >