Sunday, May 27 , 2018, 2:53 am | Fair 56º

 
 
 
 

Mona Charen: Is Obama Fair to Black Americans?

The president's response to perceived racial fires shows only that he misunderstands the problem

I’m starting to wonder: Is President Barack Obama fair to African-Americans?

Mona Charen
Mona Charen

Asked about Rep. Charlie Rangel’s ethics problems on CBS’ Evening News, the president could hardly have been more direct if he had seized Rangel by the back of the collar and belt and pitched him out the door. “I think Charlie Rangel served a very long time and served his constituents very well, but these allegations are very troubling. And he’ll — he’s somebody who’s at the end of his career. Eighty years old. I’m sure that what he wants is to be able to end his career with dignity. And my hope is that it happens.”

Now Rangel, who is fighting the ethics charges, had no plans to “end his career” and may wonder why the president is so eager to usher him off stage.

The Rangel toss comes in the aftermath of the Shirley Sherrod affair. Though the White House and Democratic operatives have been beavering away, attempting to rewrite the history of this episode as an example of right-wing — specifically Fox News — villainy, the truth is otherwise.

Sherrod was fired, as she told it, because of White House worries that her story would be appearing on the Glenn Beck show. It was fear of the Beck show, not the actuality, that prompted the White House’s panicked response. Her dismissal came before any mention of her name on Fox air.

Sherrod, who has since received apologies from the secretary of Agriculture and President Obama, had ignited one of those racial flashpoints that Obama seems particularly keen to avoid.

The White House may still be smarting from Beck’s successful “outing” of Obama’s “green jobs czar” Van Jones. But if so, it suggests that they misread that episode.

Last summer, Beck discovered and trumpeted that Jones had a seriously left-wing extremist background. A former member of the Marxist STORM (Standing Together to Organize a Revolutionary Movement), Jones was an advocate for police killer Mumia Abu-Jamal and a signatory to a 9/11 “truther” petition.

The petition called upon then-New York Attorney General Eliot Spitzer to investigate whether “people within the current (Bush) administration may indeed have deliberately allowed 9/11 to happen, perhaps as a pretext for war.” Jones is also an African-American, and in the wake of the Sherrod affair, it’s fair to ask whether that fact loomed particularly large for the president.

Jones resigned in September 2009, presumably involuntarily. It had not been an easy summer for the White House. In addition to the tea parties and raucous town hall meetings on health care, the president had mishandled the summer’s racial fireworks over professor Henry Louis Gates Jr. and officer James Crowley.

Inserting himself gratuitously into the controversy, the president popped off that the Boston police had acted “stupidly” in arresting Gates. Most Americans disagreed, and for the first time since his election, the president’s approval ratings among whites and blacks diverged dramatically. The Pew Center found that among people who had heard “a lot” about the president’s intervention in the issue, 41 percent disapproved while only 29 percent approved. Among African-Americans, 85 percent registered support for the president following the incident while only 48 percent of whites approved.

Last fall, Obama leaned heavily on New York Gov. David Paterson to pull out of the race for re-election. Paterson was facing ethics charges involving an aide accused of domestic violence as well as some penny ante corruption — seeking free Yankees tickets. Obama intervened to shove Paterson toward the door.

Both Jones and Paterson arguably deserved to be kicked to the curb, as did the Rev. Jeremiah Wright during the campaign. But Sherrod, as the world now knows, did not. And it may be that Rangel does not. But in any case, it’s beginning to seem that Obama has a hair trigger where African-Americans are concerned.

If so, he’s overreacting. The gabosphere may hyperventilate over every fresh racial story, but there’s zero evidence that race plays any role in the country’s reaction to Obama. He was wildly popular at his inauguration and has lost standing as he has a) disregarded the electorate’s wishes, and b) failed to improve the economy. By rushing around putting out perceived racial fires (and occasionally igniting them) he demonstrates only that he misunderstands the problem.

Mona Charen writes for Creators Syndicate. Click here for more information or to contact her.

Support Noozhawk Today

You are an important ally in our mission to deliver clear, objective, high-quality professional news reporting for Santa Barbara, Goleta and the rest of Santa Barbara County. Join the Hawks Club today to help keep Noozhawk soaring.

We offer four membership levels: $5 a month, $10 a month, $25 a month or $1 a week. Payments can be made through PayPal below, or click here for information on recurring credit-card payments.

Thank you for your vital support.

Become a Supporter

Enter your email
Select your membership level
×

Payment Information

You are purchasing:

Payment Method

Pay by Credit Card:

Mastercard, Visa, American Express, Discover

Pay with Apple Pay or Google Pay:

Noozhawk partners with Stripe to provide secure invoicing and payments processing.

  • Ask
  • Vote
  • Investigate
  • Answer

Noozhawk Asks: What’s Your Question?

Welcome to Noozhawk Asks, a new feature in which you ask the questions, you help decide what Noozhawk investigates, and you work with us to find the answers.

Here’s how it works: You share your questions with us in the nearby box. In some cases, we may work with you to find the answers. In others, we may ask you to vote on your top choices to help us narrow the scope. And we’ll be regularly asking you for your feedback on a specific issue or topic.

We also expect to work together with the reader who asked the winning questions to find the answer together. Noozhawk’s objective is to come at questions from a place of curiosity and openness, and we believe a transparent collaboration is the key to achieve it.

The results of our investigation will be published here in this Noozhawk Asks section. Once or twice a month, we plan to do a review of what was asked and answered.

Thanks for asking!

Click Here to Get Started >

Reader Comments

Noozhawk is no longer accepting reader comments on our articles. Click here for the announcement. Readers are instead invited to submit letters to the editor by emailing them to [email protected]. Please provide your full name and community, as well as contact information for verification purposes only.

Daily Noozhawk

Subscribe to Noozhawk's A.M. Report, our free e-Bulletin sent out every day at 4:15 a.m. with Noozhawk's top stories, hand-picked by the editors.

Sign Up Now >