Thursday, June 21 , 2018, 6:55 pm | Partly Cloudy 65º


Local News

Goleta Council OKs 10-Unit Citrus Village Housing Project in Concept

The city, the developer and a neighbor who filed an appeal compromise with a scaled-down version

[Noozhawk’s note: The Goleta City Council granted conceptual approval to the latest Citrus Village proposal. An earlier headline was incorrect.]

The Goleta City Council approved the construction of a 10-unit version of Citrus Village on Tuesday night, the result of an appeal filed by a neighbor. The decision sends the project to the Design Review Board.

Architect and developer Detty Peikert got his chance to present a revised version of his project to the council in an effort to prevent an appeal filed by resident Richard Foster from delaying or shutting down his plans for the Citrus Village condominiums, at 7388 Calle Real. The council already had moved to grant the appeal on June 2, but allowed for a presentation of alternatives before its final decision.

While presenting a series of alternative site plans for the property, Peikert pushed for a 12-unit version of the project that the city’s planning commission approved in March. That version was appealed by Foster out of concern for its size. Two of the units would be affordable. The change included taking out a three-bedroom unit and replacing it with a two-bedroom unit, and modifying the roofline to lessen the project’s visual impact.

“I think the range of unit sizes is really much more suited to the marketplace today,” Peikert said.

The version of Citrus Village presented Tuesday is the latest in a series of projects planned for the .93-acre rectangle of property in western Goleta. Plans for construction date back to 2001, when Santa Barbara County approved a 16-unit low-income housing development for the site. The current developer acquired the property in 2003, and the project has since gone through several iterations, with the number of units changing to accommodate the city’s desire for more affordable housing and its concern over size and scale.

Foster threw his support behind a 10-unit alternative, made up of five duplexes and no affordable housing. Each affordable unit necessitated additional paving for parking spaces, he said, and the two-story duplexes were more in line with the typical number of stories of other housing projects in the area. Instead of offering on-site affordable housing, Peikert would have to pay in-lieu fees.

Despite the loss of the two affordable units from the 12-unit version, the council agreed with the 10-unit compromise, saying it solved some of its design issues. This time, instead of again routing the project through the Planning Commission, the council voted to send the plans back to the Design Review Board.

Noozhawk staff writer Sonia Fernandez can be reached at .(JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address).

Support Noozhawk Today

You are an important ally in our mission to deliver clear, objective, high-quality professional news reporting for Santa Barbara, Goleta and the rest of Santa Barbara County. Join the Hawks Club today to help keep Noozhawk soaring.

We offer four membership levels: $5 a month, $10 a month, $25 a month or $1 a week. Payments can be made through PayPal below, or click here for information on recurring credit-card payments.

Thank you for your vital support.

Become a Noozhawk Supporter

First name
Last name
Enter your email
Select your membership level

Payment Information

You are purchasing:

Payment Method

Pay by Credit Card:

Mastercard, Visa, American Express, Discover

Pay with Apple Pay or Google Pay:

Noozhawk partners with Stripe to provide secure invoicing and payments processing.

  • Ask
  • Vote
  • Investigate
  • Answer

Noozhawk Asks: What’s Your Question?

Welcome to Noozhawk Asks, a new feature in which you ask the questions, you help decide what Noozhawk investigates, and you work with us to find the answers.

Here’s how it works: You share your questions with us in the nearby box. In some cases, we may work with you to find the answers. In others, we may ask you to vote on your top choices to help us narrow the scope. And we’ll be regularly asking you for your feedback on a specific issue or topic.

We also expect to work together with the reader who asked the winning questions to find the answer together. Noozhawk’s objective is to come at questions from a place of curiosity and openness, and we believe a transparent collaboration is the key to achieve it.

The results of our investigation will be published here in this Noozhawk Asks section. Once or twice a month, we plan to do a review of what was asked and answered.

Thanks for asking!

Click Here to Get Started >

Reader Comments

Noozhawk is no longer accepting reader comments on our articles. Click here for the announcement. Readers are instead invited to submit letters to the editor by emailing them to [email protected]. Please provide your full name and community, as well as contact information for verification purposes only.

Daily Noozhawk

Subscribe to Noozhawk's A.M. Report, our free e-Bulletin sent out every day at 4:15 a.m. with Noozhawk's top stories, hand-picked by the editors.

Sign Up Now >